Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Oral Oncol. 2023 Jun 28;144:106460. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106460

Table 3.

Effect of including RLN clusters in a CoxPh model for prediction of Overall Survival (OS) and Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) at 5 years, and Radiation Associated Dysphagia (RAD) at 6 months on the validation data. Clinical features are age, smoking status (never/current/former), and chemo (yes/no). (RM) radiomics clusters alone, (LN) Lymph node clusters, (RM + LN) combined 3-stage radiomics and lymph node clusters, (2F) a-priori radiomics features. The best and worst model in terms of validation AUC score are shown in green and red, respectively. Combined radiomics and LN clusters performed the best in all cases.

Model Overall Survival (OS) Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) Dysphagia (RAD)
AIC Calib Cind AUC AIC Calib Cind AUC AUC
Clinical + AJCC None (Baseline) 696.75 14.34 0.64 0.61 797.55 19.47 0.62 0.61 0.73
Additional covariate ΔAIC ΔCalib ΔCind ΔAUC ΔAIC ΔCalib ΔCind ΔAUC ΔAUC
 +RM+LN −4.016 −5.414 0.026 0.043 −2.921 32.189 0.041 0.052 0.012
+RM+LN+2FA −5.207 −0.617 0.037 0.060 −1.981 23.511 0.030 0.041 0.017
+2F −4.750 −6.946 0.019 0.034 −1.687 −1.572 −0.004 −0.002 0.005
AIC Calib Cind AUC AIC Calib Cind AUC AUC
Clinical None (Baseline) 705.07 9.91 0.61 0.60 799.42 30.07 0.54 0.55 0.65
Additional covariate ΔAIC ΔCalib ΔCind ΔAUC ΔAIC ΔCalib ΔCind ΔAUC ΔAUC
 +RM+LN −9.385 −6.322 0.045 0.059 −6.126 −0.822 0.097 0.099 0.044
+RM+LN+2FA −14.386 −2.920 0.061 0.070 −5.398 −0.933 0.096 0.091 0.080
+2F −13.704 1.556 0.045 0.045 −4.219 6.262 0.049 0.040 0.058
a

AJCC is AJCC (8th edition).

b

Clinical covariates used are age, smoking status (never/current/ former), chemo (yes/no).

c

2F includes tumor volume and intensity as predictive radiomic features directly into the model.