Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 9;22:169. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01865-0

Table 1.

Comparison of nanocarrier types for cancer therapy

Nanocarrier Type Size Range Surface Charge Drug Payload Capacity Targeting Mechanism Biodegradability Description Novelty Advantages Disadvantages Limitations/Challenges References
Liposomes 50–200 nm Neutral Low–High Passive/Active Biodegradable Spherical structures composed of a lipid bilayer enclosing an aqueous core First-generation nanocarriers for drug delivery, used in clinical practice Good biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, versatility in drug loading and targeting Short circulation time, potential drug leakage, lack of tumor specificity Limited drug payload capacity, challenges in scaling up production, difficulty in achieving controlled drug release in vivo [13]
Polymeric nanoparticles 10–200 nm Variable Low–High Passive/Active Biodegradable Solid particles made of synthetic or natural polymers Wide range of materials and formulations, suitable for various administration routes High drug loading capacity, stable in circulation, tunable surface properties Potential toxicity, burst release of drug, batch-to-batch variation, difficulty in achieving targeted drug delivery to tumors Challenges in achieving controlled release, low targeting efficiency, limited biocompatibility of some materials [14, 15]
Dendrimers 1–10 nm Variable Low-Moderate Passive/Active Non-biodegradable Branched, highly branched or spherical molecules with defined size and shape Highly customizable, multivalent surface chemistry, high drug loading capacity High biotoxicity, low biodegradability, challenges in scaling up production Limited blood circulation time, potential renal toxicity, difficulty in achieving targeted drug delivery to tumors Limited targeting efficiency, challenges in achieving controlled release, potential immunogenicity [15]
Gold nanoparticles 1–100 nm Neutral Low-Moderate Passive/Active Non-biodegradable Spherical or rod-shaped particles made of gold Excellent biocompatibility, high surface plasmon resonance effect, stability in biological fluids Low drug loading capacity, limited tumor penetration, challenges in scaling up production Potential toxicity, limited targeting efficiency, difficulty in achieving controlled drug release in vivo Limited biocompatibility of some surface modifications, potential immunogenicity [16, 17]
Carbon nanotubes 1–100 nm Negative Low–High Passive/Active Non-biodegradable Hollow cylindrical structures made of carbon atoms High aspect ratio, high drug loading capacity, potential for multi-functionalization High toxicity, limited biocompatibility, challenges in achieving controlled release Limited blood circulation time, potential clearance by the reticuloendothelial system, difficulty in achieving targeted drug delivery to tumors Potential immunogenicity, difficulty in scaling up production [18, 19]
Iron oxide nanoparticles 5–100 nm Negative Low-Moderate Passive/Active Biodegradable Magnetic particles made of iron oxide High targeting specificity, potential for MRI imaging and magnetic hyperthermia Low drug loading capacity, limited blood circulation time, challenges in achieving controlled release Potential toxicity, limited tumor penetration, difficulty in scaling up production Potential immunogenicity, low biocompatibility of some surface modifications [20]
Quantum dots 1–10 nm Negative Low-Moderate Passive/Active Non-biodegradable Semiconductor nanocrystals High brightness, tunable emission spectrum, potential for multiplexed imaging High toxicity, potential for heavy metal leaching, challenges in achieving targeted drug delivery Limited blood circulation time, potential clearance by the reticuloendothelial system, difficulty in scaling up production Potential immunogenicity, limited tumor specificity [21]
Silica nanoparticles 10–500 nm Negative Low–High Passive/Active Biodegradable Solid particles made of silica High drug loading capacity, good stability, tunable surface properties Potential toxicity, limited blood circulation time, difficulty in achieving targeted drug delivery to tumors Limited biocompatibility, challenges in achieving controlled release Potential immunogenicity, limited tumor specificity [22]
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles 20–200 nm Negative Low–High Passive/Active Biodegradable Porous particles made of silica High surface area, high drug loading capacity, tunable pore size and surface chemistry Potential toxicity, limited blood circulation time, difficulty in achieving controlled drug release in vivo Limited biocompatibility, challenges in achieving targeted drug delivery to tumors Potential immunogenicity, limited tumor specificity [23]
Lipid-nucleic acid nanoparticles 50–200 nm Neutral Low-Moderate Active Biodegradable Nanoparticles made of lipids and nucleic acids Suitable for nucleic acid delivery, good biocompatibility, low toxicity Limited drug loading capacity, potential instability, challenges in achieving efficient delivery Potential immunogenicity, limited blood circulation time Limited targeting efficiency, difficulty in scaling up production [24, 25]
Protein nanoparticles 2–200 nm Variable Low-Moderate Passive/Active Biodegradable Nanoparticles made of proteins or peptides Good biocompatibility, low toxicity, potential for targeted delivery Limited drug loading capacity, challenges in achieving efficient drug release in vivo Potential immunogenicity, limited stability, limited blood circulation time Limited targeting efficiency, difficulty in scaling up production [26, 27]
Inorganic–organic hybrid nanoparticles 10–200 nm Variable Low–High Passive/Active Biodegradable Nanoparticles made of a combination of inorganic and organic components Highly customizable, multifunctional, high drug loading capacity Potential toxicity, limited blood circulation time, challenges in achieving controlled drug release in vivo Limited biocompatibility, difficulty in achieving efficient targeting Potential immunogenicity, limited tumor specificity [28]
Metal–organic frameworks 10–500 nm Variable Low–High Passive/Active Biodegradable Porous crystalline materials made of metal ions and organic ligands Highly customizable, tunable pore size and surface chemistry, high drug loading capacity Potential toxicity, limited blood circulation time, challenges in achieving efficient targeting Limited biocompatibility, potential for drug leakage, limited stability Potential immunogenicity, limited tumor specificity [29]
Exosomes 30–150 nm Negative Low-Moderate Active Biodegradable Small extracellular vesicles derived from cells High biocompatibility, potential for targeted delivery, natural carriers of biological cargoes Limited drug loading capacity, challenges in achieving efficient targeting, potential for premature drug release Limited blood circulation time, difficulty in scaling up production Limited targeting efficiency, potential for immune system recognition [30]
Bacterial nanoparticles 10–300 nm Negative Low-Moderate Active Biodegradable Nanoparticles produced by bacteria High biocompatibility, potential for targeted delivery, easy to produce Limited drug loading capacity, potential for immunogenicity, limited control over drug release Limited blood circulation time, difficulty in achieving efficient targeting Limited targeting efficiency, potential for clearance by the immune system [31]
Polymeric micelles 10–100 nm Variable Low-Moderate Passive/Active Biodegradable Spherical particles made of block copolymers High drug loading capacity, good stability, easy to produce Limited blood circulation time, challenges in achieving efficient targeting, potential for premature drug release Limited biocompatibility, difficulty in achieving controlled release Potential immunogenicity, limited tumor specificity [32]