Table 3.
Meta-regression for training variables to predict RT effects on HbA1c.
| Coefficient | Standard error | 95 % lower CI | 95 % upper CI | Z value | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training period | 0.0236664 | 0.0215485 | -0.0209102 | 0.068243 | 1.10 | 0.283 |
| Training intensity | 0 .0048011 | 0.0232869 | -0.044123 | .0537251 | 0.21 | 0.839 |
| Training frequency | 0.4149407 | 0 .2309484 | -0.0628125 | 0.8926938 | 1.80 | 0.086 |
| Number of sets | -0.0681706 | 0.3324552 | -0.759549 | 0.6232079 | -0.21 | 0.840 |
| Number of repetitions per set | 0 .1745202 | 0.0771692 | 0.0140381 | 0.3350023 | 2.26 | 0.034 |
| Rest in between sets | 0.0003368 | 0.0011423 | -0.0021521 | 0.0028257 | 0.29 | 0.773 |
CI, confifidence interval; RT, resistance training. The bold values denote a positive correlation between the number of repetitions per set and HbA1c.