Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;22(4):403–411. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2021.1884926

Table 7.

Statistical comparison to other proposed NAC-algorithms.

Measure Author(s) Algorithm MSE (95% CI) MAPE (95% CI) R 2
NN Timmermans et al. (this study) NN = 4.11 + (0.035 * age + 0.041 * weight + 0.093 * CC + 0.14 * AUX-AUX) 1.37 (1.08–1.68) 4.1% (3.6–4.6) 0.650
Beer et al. Beer et al., 2001) NN = 2 * (2.4 + 0.09 * CC) 3.48 (2.74–4.23) 6.4% (5.7–7.1) 0.112
Atiyeh et al. (2009) NN = 0.618 * AUX-U 5.06 (3.91–6.22) 8.0% (7.0–9.0) −0.291
Schulman et al. (2001) NN = 2.192 + (0.19 * CC) 10.61 (9.23–12.0) 12.7% (11.9–13.6) −1.704
SNN Timmermans et al. (this study) SNN = 7.248 + (0.303 * NN + 0.072 * weight) 1.43 (1.13–1.74) 4.7% (4.1–5.3) 0.510
Schulman et al. (2001) SNN = (0.12 * height) − 2.782 3.58 (2.79–4.38) 7.2% (6.4–8.1) −0.210
Beckerstein et al. (1996) SNN = 11.1 + (0.13 * height in inches) 3.11 (2.54–3.70) 7.6% (6.7–8.5) −0.057

Note: AUX-AUX: anterior-axillary-fold to anterior-axillary-fold; NN: nipple-to-nipple distance; SNN: sternal-notch-to-nipple distance; AUX-U: anterior-axillary-fold-to-umbilicus, MSE: mean squared error, MAPE: mean absolute percentage error.