Table 3.
AI-based approaches for simultaneous attenuation and scatter correction
Application | Approach | Quantitative Comparison vs. Acquired CT | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Brain PET (FDG, FDOPA, Flortaucipir, Flutemetamol) | CNN | PET reconstruction bias <9% | Arabi et al., 202034 |
Brain PET (FDG) | CNN, UNet | PET reconstruction bias −4.2% ± 4.3% | Yang et al., 201935 |
Whole body PET (68Ga-PSMA) | CNN | MAE 0.91 ± 0.29 SUV, SSIM 0.973 ± 0.034, PSNR 48.17 ± 2.96 dB, PET reconstruction bias −2.46% ± 10.10% | Mostafapour et al., 202136 |
Whole body PET (FDG) | CNN | PET reconstruction bias −1.72 ± 4.22% | Shiri et al., 202037 |
Whole body PET (FDG) | CNN | NRMSE 0.21 ± 0.05 SUV, SSIM 0.98 ± 0.01, PSNR 36.3 ± 3.0 dB | Yang et al., 202038 |
Whole body PET (FDG) | CNN, GAN | MAE of < 110 HU, PET reconstruction bias <1%, PSNR >42 dB | Dong et al., 201915 |