Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;35(6):641–650. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.015

Table 2.

Surface roughness comparison according to bracket material, adhesive system, and etchant-type (SD: Standard Deviation, M: Metal, C: Ceramic, TE: Total-Etch, SE: Self-Etch, PC: Pre-Coated, FF: Flash-Free, **: Statistically Significant with p < 0.01, t-test).

Surface Roughness Comparison According to Bracket Material
Adhesive type Etchant Type Bracket Material Mean Difference (Post & Pre) SD p-value
PC TE M 1.077 0.488 0.420
C 0.916 0.430
SE M 0.468 0.332 0.988
C 0.470 0.304
FF TE M 0.700 0.378 0.967
C 0.708 0.439
SE M 0.444 0.191 0.494
C 0.522 0.318
Surface Roughness Comparison According to Adhesive System
Bracket Material Etchant Type Adhesive System Mean Difference (Post & Pre) SD p-value
M TE PC 1.077 0.488 0.057
FF 0.7 0.378
SE PC 0.468 0.332 0. 841
FF 0.444 0.191
C TE PC 0.916 0.430 0.275
FF 0.708 0.439
SE PC 0.47 0.304 0.698
FF 0.522 0.318
Surface Roughness Comparison According to Etchant Type
Bracket Material Adhesive System Etchant Type Mean Difference (Post & Pre) SD p-value
M PC TE 1.077 0.488 0.003**
SE 0.468 0.332
FF TE 0.70 0.378 0. 059
SE 0.444 0.191
C PC TE 0.916 0.430 0.011**
SE 0.470 0.304
FF TE 0.708 0.439 0.271
SE 0.522 0.318