Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;27(11):1099–1108. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02808-z

Table 3.

Surgical outcomes

Conventional (n = 59) EVASC (n = 23) EVT (n = 12) Transanal suturing (n = 6) Redo (n = 3)
Median follow-up in months (IQR) 39 (24–62) 25 (12–59) 30 (21–61) 37 (32–45) 19 (NA)
Healed anastomosis at EFU 36 (61%) 18 (78%) 5 (42%) 5 (83%) 3 (100%)
 Median interval from LAR to healed anastomosis in days (IQR) 141 (77–216) 114 (48–210) 304 (197–567) 104 (60–252) 153 (NA)
Functional anastomosis at EFU 32 (54%) 18 (78%) 4 (33%) 5 (83%) 3 (100%)
 Median interval from LAR to functional anastomosis in days (IQR) 267 (142–368) 185 (146–292) 364 (325–676) 296 (207–353) 188 (NA)
Stoma at EFU
 Pre-LAR ileostomy 2 (3%) 0 0 0 0
 Primary ileostomy (created during LAR) 4 (7%) 1 (4%) 4 (33%) 0 0
 Secondary ileostomy (after LAR) 2 (3%) 0 0 0 0
 Tertiary ileostomy (stoma after stoma closure) 1 (2%) 0 1 (8%) 0 0
 End-colostomy 14 (24%) 4 (17%) 3 (25%) 1 (17%) 0
No stoma, not healed at EFU 4 (7%) 0 0 0 0

EVASC endoscopic vacuum-assisted surgical closure, EVT endoscopic vacuum therapy, LAR low anterior resection, AL anastomotic leakage, IQR interquartile range, EFU end of follow-up, NA not available