Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 19;30(12):7700–7711. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13847-z

Table 5.

Predictors for gastric venous congestion

Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
Variable OR 95% CI p Value OR 95% CI p value
Hypertension
 No (n = 157) 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 111) 1.361 0.755–2.451 0.305
Peripheral vascular disease
 No (n = 249) 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 19) 0.677 0.190–2.410 0.547
Ischemic heart disease
 No (n = 247) 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 21) 2.487 0.977–6.332 0.056
Smoking
 No (n = 223) 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 45) 0.768 0.336–1.756 0.531
TP type
 Single-stage (n = 232) 1 [Referent]
 Completion (n = 36) 0.090 0.012–0.670 0.019
Portomesenteric venous resection
 No (n = 175) 1 [Referent] 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 93) 3.808 2.072–6.999 < 0.001 2.103 1.034–4.278 0.040
Arterial resection
 No (n = 243) 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 25) 1.189 0.451–3.131 0.726
Spleen preservationa
 No (n = 233) 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 35) 0.093 0.012–0.695 0.021
Left coronary vein ligationb
 No (n = 210) 1 [Referent] 1 [Referent]
 Yes (n = 58) 14.727 7.342–29.542 < 0.001 11.858 5.772–24.362 < 0.001

Bold value indicates statistical significance (p < 0.050)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TP, total pancreatectomy

aSplenic vein is preserved in all patients with spleen preservation, bIn all patients who underwent a left coronary vein ligation, the splenic vein also was ligated.