Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 9;13:17013. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43823-2

Table 1.

Summary of the methodology and main findings of previous studies.

Studies Stimuli Encoding Method Main findings
Tuena et al.48 Virtual scenes Incidental High vs. Medium vs. Low embodiment High > Medium and Low embodiment for source and hit rate (immediate)
Bréchet et al.49,50 3D objects Incidental Body vs. No-Body Body > No-body in a delayed recognition task
Gauthier et al.51 3D objects Incidental Body vs. No-Body Body = No-body in a recognition task (immediate and delayed)
Tacikowski et al.52 Trait-adjectives Incidental

Synch vs

Asynch V-T stimulation

Synch > Asynch in a recognition task (immediate)
Iriye and Ehrsson53 Video scenes Intentional

Synch vs

Asynch V-T stimulation

Synch > Asynch for details, reliving (immediate), vividness, emotional intensity, and confidence (one week delay)

Synch, synchronous; Asynch, asynchronous; V-T, visuo-tactile.