Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;141(3):219–230. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015526

Table 3.

Response to cilta-cel

Full cohort
N = 20
ADC exposed
N = 13
Bispecific exposed
N = 7
Overall response rate, % (95% CI) 60.0 (36.1-80.9) 61.5 (31.6-86.1) 57.1 (18.4-90.1)
Best response, rate, n (%)
 Stringent complete response 1 (5.0) 1 (7.7) 0
 Complete response 5 (25.0) 4 (30.8) 1 (14.3)
 Very good partial response 5 (25.0) 3 (23.1) 2 (28.6)
 Partial response 1 (5.0) 0 1 (14.3)
 Minimal response 1 (5.0) 0 1 (14.3)
 Stable disease 3 (15.0) 2 (15.4) 1 (14.3)
 Progressive disease 3 (15.0) 3 (23.1) 0
 Not evaluable,§ 1 (5.0) 0 1 (14.3)
 ≥VGPR 11 (55.0) 8 (61.5) 3 (42.9)
Median duration of response (95% CI), mo 11.5 (7.9-NE) 11.5 (7.9-NE) 8.2 (4.4-NE)
Median time to first response (range), mo 0.95 (0.9-6.0) 0.97 (0.9-5.1) 0.92 (0.9-6.0)
Median time to best response (range), mo 2.22 (0.9-9.9) 2.58 (0.9-9.9) 1.41 (0.9-7.0)
MRD negativity, n (%)
 No. of patients evaluable at 10−5 10 7 3
 Rate, n (%) 7 (70.0) 5 (71.4) 2 (66.7)

Response assessed by validated computerized algorithm.

ADC, antibody-drug conjugate; CI, confidence interval; MRD, minimal residual disease; NE, not evaluable; VGPR, very good partial response.

Classification is based on the last anti-BCMA therapy used if patients received >1 anti-BCMA therapy; 1 patient received BsAb before ADC and another 2 different types of ADC sequentially.

Sum of sCR + CR + VGPR + partial response.

Patients died prior to confirmed disease evaluation.

§

Patient died at day 17 and was therefore not assessed.