Table 7.
Quantitative synthesis of controlled pharmacological studies sorted by risk of bias assessment
| RoB | Primary endpoint | Baseline vs. end of treatment | ||
| d [95% CI] | ||||
| Verum | Placebo | |||
| Nicoli de Mattos et al. (2020) | 56 | YBOCS-SV | −1.65 [−2.36, −0.95] | −1.17 [−1.80, −0.54] |
| Black et al. (2000) | 28 | YBOCS-SV | −1.12 [−1,98, −0.26] | −1.15 [−2.05, −0.24] |
| Koran et al. (2003)a | 28 | YBOCS-SV | −0.66 [−1.74, 0.41]b | 1.77 [0.62, 2.93]b |
| Ninan et al. (2000) | 26 | YBOCS-SV | −1.39 [−2.08, −0.70] | −1.56 [−2.33, −0.79] |
Note. RoB = risk of bias based on CONSORT criteria (higher scores indicate lower risk of bias), YBOCS-SV = Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.
Cohen's d and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. All based on published intention-to-treat analyses. Negative dYBOCS-SV indicate the effect size of improvement in compulsive buying-shopping disorder symptoms. adouble-blind discontinuation phase of an open-label study.
The findings of the double-blind discontinuation phase reported by Koran et al. (2007) are not included in the quantitative synthesis because YBOCS-SV means and SDs were not provided by group.