Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 18;12(3):721–732. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00044

Table A1.

Mediation models predicting (log +1) PGSI scores

Mediator Jurisdiction -> mediator Mediator -> PGSI Indirect effect Direct effect Variance explained
Model 3: EGM participation plus demographics . . . 0.005 (−0.025, 0.036) 0.265***
EGMs −0.160*** (−0.205, −0.116) 0.320*** (0.289, 0.351) −0.051*** (−0.067, –0.036) . .

Note: Values are standardised coefficients and 95% confidence intervals. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Independent variable was jurisdiction (rest of Australia = 0, WA = 1), and mediator was participating on EGMs within the last 12 months (no = 0, yes = 1).