Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 10;23:743. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04704-4

Table 2.

Survey form scores to evaluate the post-simulation reaction of residents and measure the desirability of the course

Evaluation criteria Mean ± SD Maximum score Minimum score
A- Content 29.4 ± 0.8 30 27
Applicability of the content (expression of evidence and practical scenarios) 5 ± 0 5 5
Content up-to-date 5 ± 0 5 5
Increasing your information about the training course 5 ± 0 5 5
The potential created by this session for job activities 4.4 ± 0.3 5 3
Suitability of program content to your expectations 5 ± 0 5 5
The attractiveness of the course for continued attendance 5 ± 0 5 5
B-Professor (Instructor) 48.7 ± 1 50 45
The ability to express and convey content 5 ± 0 5 5
Using new methods of teaching and learning 5 ± 0 5 5
The level of expertise and mastery of the instructor 5 ± 0 5 5
Presenting, progressing, and redirecting the scenario 5 ± 0 5 5
Introduction and presentation of teaching references 4.7 ± 0.4 5 4
Creating motivation and attracting the participation of learners 5 ± 0 5 5
Use of teaching instrument 4.7 ± 0.4 5 4
Create interest in asking and answering 5 ± 0 5 5
Ability to manage time 4.4 ± 0.3 5 3
General evaluation of training course management 4.7 ± 0.4 5 4
 C. Organization 18.1 ± 2 20 14
Course notification and planning coordination 4.8 ± 0.3 5 4
Educational facilities and aids 3.5 ± 0.5 5 2
The behavior of the presenters 5 ± 0 5 5
Educational environment in terms of physical facilities 4.7 ± 0.4 5 3
Total scores (overall satisfaction score) 96.3 ± 3.7 100 89