Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 3;10(11):7279–7291. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1980

TABLE 3.

Latent profile analysis indicators.

Indicator Profile 1 Exhausted Profile 2 Exhausted with thriving Profile 3 Exhausted with thriving and recovery Profile 4 Thriving and recovery
N = 96 (14%) N = 43 (6%) N = 358 (52%) N = 186 (27%)
Emotional Exhaustion Very high High Moderate‐high Low
Emotional Thriving Low Moderate‐high Moderate‐high Very high
Emotional Recovery Moderate Low Moderate‐high Very high
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Emotional exhaustion 85.5 ± 12.9 71.7 ± 17.3 64.3 ± 15.1 22.0 ± 13.1
Emotional thriving 30.1 ± 13.8 66.6 ± 12.6 68.5 ± 14.8 85.2 ± 12.9
Emotional recovery 50.6 ± 19.6 23.8 ± 10.6 70.1 ± 14.8 80.2 ± 16.3
F (df1, df2) p‐value η 2 η 2 95% CI A posteriori pairwise contrasts
Emotional exhaustion 534.56(3, 679) <0.0001 0.70 0.67, 0.73 p1 > p2 > p3 > p4
Emotional thriving 328.50(3, 679) <0.0001 0.59 0.55, 0.63 p4 > (p3 = p2) > p1
Emotional recovery 190.58(3, 679) <0.0001 0.46 0.40, 0.50 p4 > p3 > p1 > p2

Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation. η 2 = eta‐squared effect size; cutoff for η 2 effect sizes: 0.01 = small, 0.06 = medium, and 0.14 = large effects, CI = confidence interval. F‐value for one‐way ANOVAs using General Linear Models; Pairwise contrasts: p1, p2, p3, p4 indicate profile number.