Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2023 Jun 1;39(6):249–258. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001109

Table 4.

Respondent-reported side effects (N=650)

Currently taking Previously taking p-value Interference
N (%) reporting side effect Interference* Median [IQR] N (%) reporting side effect Interference* Median [IQR]
Dry mouth 194 (43.7%) 0 [0, 1] 54 (25.3%) 1 [0, 3] 0.015
Drowsiness 178 (40.1%) 2 [0, 4] 62 (29.1%) 4 [1, 8] 0.0004
Increased Appetite 135 (30.4%) 0 [0, 1] 36 (16.9%) 3 [0, 5] 0.0009
Difficulty thinking straight 80 (18.0%) 4 [2, 6] 46 (21.6%) 7 [4.8, 9] <0.0001
Dizziness 69 (15.5%) 2 [1, 5] 26 (12.2%) 7 [3.8, 8.3] <0.0001
Fatigue 58 (13.1%) 3 [1, 6] 22 (10.2%) 7 [6, 9] <0.0001
Increased heart rate 38 (8.6%) 1 [0, 2] 20 (9.4%) 5 [2, 8] <0.0001
Headache 25 (5.6%) 2 [1, 4.5] 9 (4.2%) 5 [4, 7] 0.063
Irrational fears 18 (4.1%) 2.5 [1, 5.3] 13 (6.1%) 10 [6, 10] 0.0005
Nausea 16 (3.6%) 2 [0, 6] 7 (3.2%) 8 [3, 10] 0.043
None 122 (27.5%) 96 (45.1%)
*

If a participant indicated that they experienced a side effect, they were asked to rate how much that side effect interfered with their daily activities.

The full sample for each group was used as the denominator for calculating percentages to represent the proportion of the total sample that endorsed each side effect.