Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;17(5):1364–1375. doi: 10.1177/19322968221094626

Table 3.

GRADE Profile.

Certainty assessment No. of patients Effect Certainty Importance
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Telemedicine Usual care Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Infant birth weight
 10 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a None 471 428 MD 19.34 g higher (47.8 lower to 86.47 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Hypoglycemic events (mother)
 2 Randomized trials Serious b Not serious Not serious Very serious c None 26 25 SMD 0.34 SD lower
(0.9 lower to 0.22 higher)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
HbA1c%
 5 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 148 140 MD 0.14 lower
(0.51 lower to 0.23 higher)
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Fasting blood glucose
 4 Randomized trials Serious d Not serious Not serious Serious a None 134 131 MD 0.12 mg/dL lower
(3.13 lower to 2.89 higher)
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Two-hour glucose tolerance
 2 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Serious e Very serious a None 164 175 MD 9.62 mg/dL higher
(1.95 higher to 17.28 higher)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Weight gain during pregnancy (mother)
 2 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 150 154 SMD 0 SD
(0.22 lower to 0.23 higher)
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Pregnancy-induced hypertension/preeclampsia
 7 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 29/352 (8.2%) 26/350 (7.4%) Log odds 0.21 (−0.37 to 0.79) — per 1000 (from — to —) ⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Gestational age at delivery
 11 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a None 504 478 MD 0.05 weeks lower
(0.24 lower to 0.14 higher)
⨁⨁⨁◯Moderate
Induced labor
 3 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 104/221 (47.1%) 110/233 (47.2%) Log odds 0.00(−0.37 to 0.38) — per 1000
(from — to —)
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Cesarean delivery
 11 Randomized trials Not serious Serious f Not serious Serious a None 191/595 (32.1%) 209/575 (36.3%) Log odds −0.11(−0.50 to 0.27) — per 1000(from — to —) ⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Preterm delivery
 3 Randomized trials Serious d Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 10/117 (8.5%) 12/111 (10.8%) Log odds −0.38(−1.31 to 0.55) — per 1000
(from — to —)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Premature membrane rupture
 2 Randomized trials Serious d Serious g Not serious Very serious a None 3/68 (4.4%) 3/65 (4.6%) Log odds 0.00(−3.13 to 3.13) — per 1000(from — to —) ⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Placental abruption
 2 Randomized trials Serious d Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 1/81 (1.2%) 1/73 (1.4%) Log odds −0.14(−2.14 to 1.87) — per 1000
(from — to —)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Stillbirth
 2 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a Publication bias strongly suspected h 0/81 (0.0%) 1/86 (1.2%) Log odds −0.58(−3.02 to 1.86) — per 1000
(from — to —)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Neonatal hypoglycemia
 7 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a None 51/358 (14.2%) 44/354 (12.4%) Log odds 0.19(−0.27 to 0.64) — per 1000
(from — to —)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Jaundice
 5 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 26/238 (10.9%) 26/240 (10.8%) Log odds 0.14(−0.47 to 0.76) — per 1000
(from — to —)
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Shoulder dystocia
 4 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 1/234 (0.4%) 10/236 (4.2%) Log odds −1.34
(−2.61 to −0.08)
— per 1000
(from — to —)
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Infant respiratory distress
 3 Randomized trials Serious d Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 8/89 (9.0%) 12/89 (13.5%) Log odds −0.53(−1.49 to 0.44) — per 1000(from — to —) ⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Neonates large for gestational age
 5 Randomized trials Serious d Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 30/189 (15.9%) 21/180 (11.7%) Log odds 0.34
(−0.26 to 0.94)
— per 1000(from — to —) ⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Admissions to neonatal intensive care
 7 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a None 57/423 (13.5%) 61/403 (15.1%) Log odds −0.12
(−0.53 to 0.28)
— per 1000(from — to —) ⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate

Abbreviations: GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; SMD, standardized mean difference; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c.

a

Recommendation would be different depending on whether or not the lower or the upper boundary of the confidence interval is the true underlying effect. Furthermore, evidence fails to meet the optimal information criteria.

b

One of the two studies had a high risk of bias.

c

Only two small studies, broad confidence intervals, not fulfilling optimal information size.

d

Studies with high weights in meta-analysis have serious or moderate problems with bias.

e

Assessed up to three months post partum.

f

Point estimates vary, test for similar effect size statistically significant, heterogeneity large.

g

Point estimates vary, heterogeneity large.

h

Studies assigned dominant weight in meta-analysis in favor of telemedicine is industry sponsored.