Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2023 Sep 19;10:1185779. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1185779

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2023 Callewaert, Pezavant, Vandaele, Meeus, Vankrunkelsven, Van Goethem, Plumacker, Misset, Darcis, Piret, De Vleeschouwer, Staelens, Van Varenbergh, Tombeur, Ottevaere, Montag, Vandecandelaere, Jonckheere, Vandekerckhove, Tobback, Wieers, Marot, Anseeuw, D’Hoore, Tuyls, De Tavernier, Catteeuw, Lotfi, Melnik, Aksenov, Grandjean, Stevens, Gasthuys and Guyot.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PMC Copyright notice

Results from the national survey on acceptability toward the use of SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs in practice. (A) Do you accept detection dogs to be used for this purpose? (B) Do you trust in the outcome of the SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs? (C) Which test would people trust more: the outcome of the SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs or the outcome of the qPCR test? (D) Is it ethical to use detection dogs for this purpose? (E) Is it organizationally possible to use detection dogs in real life? (F) Is it dangerous to use dogs for this purpose?