Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 28;25(10):euad295. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad295

Table 2.

Patient demographics

SDL (n = 153) LLL (n = 153) P-value
Age (years) 80 ± 11 74 ± 13 <0.001
Male/female 91/62 92/61 0.85
Indication
 Pace and ablate 19 (12%) 24 (16%) 0.94
 AVB-I 5 (3%) 4 (3%)
 AVB-II Wenckebach 13 (8%) 11 (8%)
 AVB-II Mobitz 2 11 (7%) 9 (6%)
 AVB-III 54 (35%) 55 (36%)
LOT-CRT 3 (2%) 2 (1%)
In lieu of BiV-CRT 7 (5%) 10 (7%)
Syncope and BBB 22 (14%) 16 (10%)
Slow AF 19 (12%) 22 (14%)
Baseline rhythm
 SR 101 (66%) 100 (65%) 0.95
 AF 46 (30%) 46 (30%)
 Flutter 6 (4%) 7 (5%)
Comorbidities
 Ischaemic heart disease 63 (41%) 43 (28%) 0.016
 Dilated cardiomyopathy 11 (7%) 12 (8%) 0.83
 PTCA 34 (22%) 21 (14%) 0.48
 CABG 12 (8%) 4 (3%) 0.151
 Valve surgery 12 (8%) 17 (11%) 0.44
 TAVI 20 (13%) 6 (4%) 0.004
 Diabetes 49 (32%) 47 (31%) 0.81
 Hypertension 124 (81%) 112 (73%) 0.11
 Kidney failure 50 (33%) 44 (29%) 0.46
 LVEF 54.8 ± 2.1 53 ± 2.3 0.25
 Left-sided approach 147 (96%) 146 (95%) 1.00
 Right-sided approach 6 (4%) 7 (5%)

Numbers in bold are statistically significant.

Groups are split according to the lead type used initially.

AF, atrial fibrillation; AVB, atrio-ventricular block; BBB, bundle branch block; BiV-CRT, biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy; CABG, coronary artery bypass surgery; LLL, lumenless lead; LOT-CRT, left bundle branch optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PTCA, percutaneous coronary angioplasty; SDL, stylet-driven lead; SR, sinus rhythm; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.