Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;51(11):1515–1526. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005963

TABLE 3.

Secondary Outcome Analysis

Secondary Outcome, Mortality Study Group p Relative Risk (95% CI)
HFNC (n = 47) Face-Mask CPAP (n = 52) Helmet CPAP (n = 52) HFNC vs Face-Mask CPAP Helmet CPAP vs Face-Mask CPAP
28 d, no. of patients, n (%) 11/47 (23) 16/52 (32) 20/52 (38) 0.24
90 d, no. of patients, n (%) 20/47 (43) 20/52 (38) 21/52 (40) 0.89
Interval between enrollment and death, d, median (interquartile range) 17.5 (10–27.5) 22 (13–26.5) 19 (8–25) 0.84
Unadjusted analysis—mortality 1.11 (0.69–1.78) 1.05 (0.65–1.69)
Adjusted analysis—mortalitya 1.16 (0.73–1.83) 1.17 (0.74–1.83)
Adjusted analysis crossed-over groups—mortalityb 0.73 (0.41–1.31) 0.98 (0.65–1.48)
(HFNC and face-mask CPAP combined) vs helmet CPAPc
Adjusted analysis—mortalitya 1.09 (0.74–1.60)

CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure, HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula.

a

Analysis adjusted for age ≥ 55 and severe Pao2/Fio2 ratio.

b

Analysis considering patients who crossed over within 24 hr in the new group and comparing them to face-mask CPAP adjusted for age ≥ 55 and severe Pao2/Fio2 ratio.

c

Relative risk for 90-d mortality controlling for age ≥ 55 and severe Pao2/Fio2 ratio (HFNC and face-mask CPAP combined and compared with helmet CPAP).