Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 10;14:6326. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42027-6

Fig. 3. Antimicrobial binding of intestinal memory B-cell antibodies from eART and lART.

Fig. 3

a Violin plots (top) comparing the antibody binding to commensal bacteria between eART (blue) and lART (red) donors. Averaged values of antibodies (n = 200) tested in duplicate in two independent experiments are shown. Groups were compared using two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test with Welch’s correction. Plots (bottom) comparing the reactivity pattern of individual antibodies to commensal bacteria between eART (blue) and lART (red). * indicates that L2-168 antibody specifically binds to B. subtilis. Bars correspond to the medians. Antibodies were tested in duplicate in two independent experiments. b Correlation plots of polyreactivity vs. binding of intestinal memory B-cell antibodies to commensal bacteria. The x-axis indicates the polyreactivity CAUC values presented in Fig. 2b. Bivariate correlations were estimated with the two-tailed Pearson correlation test. c Representative ELISA graphs showing the reactivity of L2-168 antibody against selected Bacillaceaes strains (B. cereus, B. licheniformis, B. cytotoxicus and B. subtilis). Means ± SEM of triplicate values are shown. d Microscopic image showing the IFA binding of L2-168 antibody to B. subtilis (Magnifications ×100 and ×1000) (representative of two independent experiments). The scale bar represents 15 µm. e Dot blot comparing the reactivity of L2-168 to purified LTA from Gram+ bacteria: B. subtilis, S. aureus and S. pyogenes. f Same as in (c) but for purified peptidoglycan and flagellin from B. subtilis. L2-168 antibody was tested in triplicate. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.