Table 6. Four cases of observational studies were selected after the quality appraisal phase.
Representative of the population | Exposure of interest clearly defined | Comparison group clearly defined | Selection of the non-exposed | Confounding factors adjusted for in the analysis | Outcome of interest clearly defined | Follow-up periods similar across all participants | Ascertainment of exposure | Outcome was not known at the start of the study | Published in an indexed journal | Score | |
Park et al. (2018) [25] | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 6/10 |
Polewczyk et al. [26] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | 7/10 |
Nowosielecka et al. (2022) [27] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 7/10 |
Pecha et al. (2021) [28] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 8/10 |