Table 2.
Exploratory factor analysis of the Japanese Midwives Professional Autonomy Scale N=399
| Factor | Reliability coefficient Cronbach’s α
(Total scale =0.95) |
||||||
| I | II | III | IV | V | |||
| Factor I Perinatal midwifery practice ability (9 items) | 0.94 | ||||||
| 28 | I can provide midwifery care to help new mothers approach childcare positively. | 0.88 | –0.07 | 0.11 | –0.06 | 0.01 | |
| 30 | I can provide midwifery care to help newborns adapt to life outside the womb. | 0.88 | 0.10 | –0.05 | –0.08 | –0.05 | |
| 29 | I can provide midwifery care to prevent deviation from the normal events that could occur after childbirth. | 0.85 | 0.01 | –0.01 | 0.05 | –0.03 | |
| 31 | I can provide midwifery care that promotes attachment between mother and child and the family. | 0.85 | –0.08 | 0.15 | –0.04 | –0.10 | |
| 27 | I can provide midwifery care to support breastfeeding. | 0.76 | –0.07 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |
| 32 | I can judge deviation from the norm in newborns (neonatal asphyxia, jaundice, poor suckling, etc.). | 0.61 | 0.17 | –0.10 | 0.19 | –0.05 | |
| 26 | I can provide midwifery care to facilitate overall recovery in new mothers. | 0.56 | 0.36 | –0.01 | –0.04 | –0.02 | |
| 20 | I can provide midwifery care to prevent deviation from the normal events that could occur during pregnancy. | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.08 | –0.03 | 0.15 | |
| 21 | I can judge deviation from the norm during pregnancy (pregnancy-induced hypertension, fetal growth restriction, etc.) | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.11 | |
| Factor II Responsibilities in midwifery care (6 items) | 0.89 | ||||||
| 22 | I can provide midwifery care suited to the mother’s stage of delivery. | 0.02 | 0.98 | –0.02 | –0.05 | –0.09 | |
| 24 | I can provide midwifery care to prevent deviation from the normal events that could occur during the progression of childbirth (prolonged labor, infection, hemorrhage, etc.). | 0.12 | 0.70 | –0.10 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |
| 23 | I can provide midwifery care to allow the mother to actively participate in childbirth. | 0.24 | 0.57 | 0.06 | –0.09 | 0.07 | |
| 9 | I can take responsibility for the midwifery care I provided. | –0.08 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 0.04 | –0.05 | |
| 25 | I can handle sudden emergencies in the mother or child (non-reassuring fetal status, atonic hemorrhage, eclampsia, etc.). | 0.27 | 0.47 | –0.16 | 0.20 | 0.04 | |
| 1 | I provide midwifery care based on a professional mindset. | –0.02 | 0.45 | 0.33 | –0.05 | –0.04 | |
| Factor IIICaring in midwifery care (4 items) | 0.83 | ||||||
| 5 | I can provide midwifery care that respects the values of the mother and family (culture, religion, etc.). | –0.02 | 0.04 | 0.74 | –0.01 | 0.02 | |
| 6 | I can respect reproductive health/rights. | 0.06 | –0.10 | 0.72 | –0.01 | 0.10 | |
| 7 | I can express my opinion while respecting the other person’s opinion. | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.64 | 0.06 | –0.03 | |
| 8 | I can provide support according to changes in the responses of the mother, child, and family. | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.53 | 0.09 | –0.02 | |
| Factor IVCollaboration and cooperation in midwifery care (3 items) | 0.85 | ||||||
| 14 | I can collaborate with other professionals (doctors, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, etc.). | –0.07 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.88 | –0.03 | |
| 13 | I can cooperate with other departments in the event of an emergency. | 0.04 | 0.03 | –0.04 | 0.84 | 0.03 | |
| 15 | I can coordinate with other professionals (public health nurses, social workers, etc.) to work toward the discharge of mothers and children who require support. | 0.17 | –0.09 | 0.15 | 0.57 | –0.01 | |
| Factor VBrush up on midwifery care (2 items) | 0.69 | ||||||
| 18 | I can work on research for midwifery practice. | 0.03 | –0.05 | –0.03 | –0.03 | 0.88 | |
| 17 | I can participate in conferences and training outside the hospital to gain new knowledge and skills on my own. | –0.11 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.60 | |
| Correlations between factors I | – | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.46 | ||
| II | – | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.46 | |||
| III | – | 0.60 | 0.44 | ||||
| IV | – | 0.45 | |||||
| V | – | ||||||
Principal factor method, promax rotation, factor loading > 0.40, KMO: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin =0.96