Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 4;16:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.10.002

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies.

Author Year Country Participants
Tools
Assessed skills
No % female Specialty Level / experience (%) Intervention(s) Control Other Technical CanMEDSa NOTSSa
Ahlborg [29] 2013 Sweden 19 NS Obstetrics and Gynaecology Not specified VR trainer No additional training Tubal occlusions
Akdemir [30] 2014 Turkey 60 25 % Gynaecology PGY 1 and 2 VR trainer No additional training Analogue box-trainer Bilateral Tubal Ligation (Decision making)
Araujo [31] 2014 Brazil 14 14,3 % Surgery No experience with laparoscopic colectomy VR trainer No additional training Laparoscopic skills (Decision making)
Borahay [32] 2013 USA 16 83,3 % Obstetrics and Gynaecology 8 PGY 1
8 PGY 2
Robot trainer Analogue box-trainer Laparoscopic skills
Brown [33] 2017 USA 26 NS 10 General surgery, 7 Urology,
9 Obstetrics and Gynaecology
8 PGY 1 (30,1 %)
5 PGY 2 (19,2 %)
6 PGY 3 (23,1 %)
5 PGY 4 (19,2 %)
2 PGY 5 (7,7 %)
2 robot trainers Basic robotic surgery skills
Camp [34] 2016 USA 57 NS Orthopaedic surgery 9 PGY 1 (15,8 %)
12 PGY 2 (21,1 %)
6 PGY 3 (10,6 %)
9 PGY 4 (15,8 %)
9 PGY 5 (15,8 %)
VR trainer No additional training Cadaver training Arthroscopy (Decision making)
Cannon [35] 2014 USA 48 NS Orthopaedic surgery PGY 3 VR trainer No additional training Arthroscopy
Daly [36] 2013 USA 21 NS Ophthalmology PGY 2 VR trainer Wet lab training Cataract surgery
Dickerson [37] 2019 USA 42 26,2 % Orthopaedic surgery PGY 1–5
(mean PGY 2.3–2.7)
Post-op coaching session with POV-video of surgery Post-op coaching session without POV-video of surgery Intra-articular distal tibial fracture reduction (Collaborator) (Decision making)
Fried [38] 2010 USA 25 NS Ear Nose Throat surgery PGY 1–2 VR trainer “Access to conventional material” Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (Communication and Teamwork)
Garfjeld Roberts [39] 2019 UK 28 46,7 % Trauma / orthopaedic surgery 24 PGY 2 (80 %)
6 PGY 3 (20 %)
Box trainer “Normal deanery-provided training” Knee arthroscopy (Collaborator) (Decision making)
Graafland [40] 2017 Netherlands 31 41.7 % General surgery 3 PGY 1 (9,7 %)
20 PGY 2 (64,5 %)
1 PGY 3 (3,2 %)
Basic laparoscopic training course with serious game Basic laparoscopic training course without serious game Situational awareness in OR (Communication and Teamwork)
Hauschild [41] 2021 USA 38 NS Orthopaedic surgery PGY 1–5 VR trainer Dry lab training Shoulder arthroscopy
Hooper [42] 2019 USA 14 35.7 % Orthopaedic surgery PGY 1 Immersive VR trainer “Standard study materials” Shoulder Arthroscopy Situation awareness
Hou [43] 2018 China 10 40 % NS No experience VR trainer “Traditional teaching method” Cervical pedicle screw placement (Decision making)
Huri [44] 2020 Turkey 34 0 % Orthopaedic surgery NS VR trainer Cadaver training Shoulder Arthroscopy (Collaborator) (Decision making)
Jensen [45] 2014 Denmark 30 64.3 % Urology, General surgery, Cardiothoracic surgery, Orthopaedic surgery NS VR trainer Analogue box trainer Shoulder Arthroscopy (Communication and Teamwork)
Kantar [46] 2020 USA 13 23.1 % Plastic Surgery 3 PGY 1 (23,1 %)
3 PGY2 (23,1 %)
3 PGY 3 (23,1 %)
4 PGY 4 (30,8 %)
VR trainer Learning from text-book Unilateral cleft lip repair
Korets [47] 2011 USA 16 NS Urology 10 PGY 1–3 (62,5 %)
6 PGY 4–5 (37,5 %)
Robot trainer with digital coaching vs. robot trainer with mentor No additional training Basic surgical skills
Korndorffer [48] 2012 USA 20 50 % (80 % digital, 20 % analogue) General Surgery PGY 1–5
(mean PGY 2.3–2.8)
Digital boxtrainer Analogue boxtrainer Basic laparoscopic skills
Kun [49] 2019 China 50 54 % NS PGY 2–3 Robot trainer with self-coaching with exercise videos Robot trainer with self-coaching without videos of the exercise Basic Robotic skills (Collaborator) (Decision making)
Logishetty [50] 2019 UK 28 29,2 % Surgery Orthopaedic surgery PGY 3–5 Immersive VR trainer “Conventional preparatory materials” Total hip arthroplasty (Communication and Teamwork)
Lohre [51] 2020 Canada 16 NS Orthopaedic surgery 6 PGY 4 (37,5 %)
10 PGY 5 (62,5)
Immersive VR trainer “Traditional learning using a technical journal article” Shoulder arthroplasty (Collaborator) (Decision making)
McKinney [61] 2022 USA 22 NS Orthopaedic surgery 7 PGY 1 (31,8 %)
7 PGY 2 (31,8 %)
3 PGY 3 (13,6 %)
3 PGY 4 (13,6 %)
2 PGY 5 (9,1 %)
Immersive VR trainer “Reading the technique guide” Knee arthroplasty (Decision making)
Orzech [52] 2012 Canada 24 NS General Surgery PGY >2, median PGY 2.6–3.2 VR trainer Analogue boxtrainer Advanced laparoscopic skills (Communication and Teamwork)
Palter [53] 2013 Canada 16 NS General Surgery 14 PGY 1 (87,5 %)
2 PGY 2 (12,5 %)
VR trainer Normal residency curriculum, without additional training. Basic laparoscopic skills
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Sharifzadeh [60] 2021 Iran 46 100 % Obstetrics and Gynaecology PGY 2–3 Serious game No additional training Basic ynaecological skills (Decision making)
Sloth [54] 2021 Denmark 46 69,6 % General surgery
Urology
Gynaecology
PGY 1, no previous simulation training, <50 supervised laparoscopic procedures Digital boxtrainer at home vs digital boxtrainer in hospital Intracorporeal suturing
Valdis [55] 2016 Canada 40 30 % General Surgery < 10 h on robotic surgical simulator, mean year of training: 4–5 VR trainer No additional training Wet lab training
Dry lab training
Basic robotic skills (Decision Making)
van Det [56] 2011 Netherlands 10 NS General Surgery No experience with laparoscopic surgery Video-enhanced intraoperative feedback Traditional intraoperative feedback Nissen fundoplication (Communication and Teamwork)
Varras [57] 2020 Greece 20 45 % Obstetrics and Gynaecology < 10 laparoscopic surgeries, no experience with VR simulators Digital boxtrainer
VR trainer
Basic laparoscopic skills Decision making
Waterman [58] 2016 USA 22 4,5 % Orthopaedic surgery PGY 1–4, median PGY 3.0 VR trainer “Standard practice” Basic laparoscopic skills (Collaborator) (Decision making)
Yiasemidou [59] 2017 UK 25 NS General Surgery ST3-ST4, <15 laparoscopic cholecystectomies as primary surgeon VR trainer Analogue box trainer Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Communication and Teamwork)
a

When non-technical skills are presented between brackets, they were assessed by the authors but outcomes specific for that non-technical skill are not presented in the manuscript.