(A) Experimental setup. Muscimol was injected unilaterally in the
intermediate and deep layers of SC. On half of the experiments, Neuropixels
recordings were obtained from ipsilateral area LIP.
(B) Saccadic latencies measured in an instructed delayed saccade task
were slowed by ~50 ms relative to pre-injection in a region of the contralateral
visual field (heatmap). The left-choice target was placed in the center of this
region.
(C) An impairment in the mechanism for detecting the threshold might
result in a requirement for stronger signals to achieve termination for
choices. This is equivalent to application of
higher decision threshold for choices (left panel) while leaving the
threshold for choices unchanged (right panel).
(D) Simulated choice proportions (bottom) and RT (top), generated by the
model in (C), before (black) and after (green) a 70% increase in the
decision threshold. Curves show the fit of a
bounded evidence-accumulation model. Inset depicts the predicted effect of SC
inactivation on the slope of the choice function.
(E) Choice-RT data before (black) and after (green) unilateral SC
inactivation. Inset depicts the model-derived decision threshold before and after SC
inactivation. SC inactivation increased the decision threshold by 31.9%.
(F) Same as (E) but for saline/sham injection experiments.
(G) Effects of muscimol (green) and saline/sham (gray) injection on
choice bias (top) and the slope of the choice function (bottom). Positive values
for choice bias indicate a bias toward ipsilateral (rightward) choices. Asterisk
denotes a statistically significant difference (p<.01,
likelihood ratio test).
(H) Muscimol-induced slowing of left-choice RTs (top) is substantially
larger than the slowing of saccades in (B) (dotted line). The same analysis for
the saline controls is shown on the bottom.