Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 11;12:90. doi: 10.1186/s40164-023-00454-7

Table 4.

Subgroup analysis and exploration of heterogeneity in CD22 CAR-T clinical trials

Patients with available data Overall response rate Complete response
rate
negative Minimal residual disease Cytokine release
syndrome
 ≥ Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome Neurotoxicity  ≥ Grade 3 neurotoxicity Relapse rate CD22 dim/negative
relapse rate
Age Group
 Children (N = 114)

76%

(68–83)

74%

(65–81)

-

87%

(80–92)

6%

(3–12)

28%

(21–37)

-

36%

(18–54)

16%

(0–32)

 Adult (N = 37)

75%

(59–87)

57%

(41–72)

-

84%

(68–93)

5%

(1–19)

11%

(4–25)

-

6%

(0–20)

3%

(0–9)

 p value 0.94 0.05* - 0.6 0.9 0.04* - 0.01** 0.14
Bone marrow involvement (B-ALL)
 High burden (N = 98)

74%

(65–82)

63%

(43–83)

66%

(55–75)

86%

(78–92)

7%

(3–14)

25%

(17–34)

1%

(0–7)

23%

(6–58)

8%

(1–46)

 Low burden (N = 25)

81%

(66–96)

76%

(59–93)

68%

(48–83)

88%

(69–96)

4%

(1–24)

32%

(17–52)

4%

(1–24)

40%

(23–60)

12%

(4–31)

 p value 0.22 0.54 0.82 0.81 0.6 0.46 0.32 0.37 0.73
Disease
 B-ALL (N = 133)

76%

(69–83)

72%

(65–80)

-

87%

(82–93)

4%

(1–8)

20%

(8–32)

1%

(0–3)

31%

(13–49)

11%

(0–23)

 B cell lymphoma (N = 28)

86%

(73–99)

64%

(47–82)

-

74%

(19–100)

4%

(0–12)

10%

(0–28)

0%

(0–6)

8%

(0–19)

4%

(0–12)

 p value 0.19 0.41 -  < 0.01** 0.87 0.36 0.75 0.04* 0.35
Prior CD19 CAR-T therapy
 Yes (N = 67)

75%

(65–87)

73%

(62–86)

45%

(16–74)

76%

(62–91)

9%

(3–30)

0%

(0–6)

0%

(0–6)

19%

(0–46)

24%

(9–66)

 No (N = 15)

76%

(58–100)

79%

(58–100)

62%

(22–100)

83%

(62–100)

13%

(3–58)

0%

(0–6)

0%

(0–6)

29%

(5–52)

20%

(7–60)

 p value 0.76 0.64 0.5 0.59 0.72 1 1 0.59 0.55

Data are event rate, % (95% CI), p values, or number of patients. Adults were patients aged 20 years or older; children were patients aged younger than 20 years, CAR chimeric antigen receptor