Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 14;481(11):2110–2124. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002720

Table 6.

Complication, graft survival, and limb function reported in other studies

Author n Type of graft Complication Graft removal Limb function
Rate Detail Risk Rate Detail Risk MSTS Factor
Bus et al. [7] 87 AL (IC) 76% NU (40%), FX (29%), INF (14%) Tibia and IM nail for NU 17% FX (6%), INF (5%), NU (5%), R (2%) N/A N/A N/A
Hornicek et al. [18] 945 AL (OA, IC, AD, and C) N/A INF (18.7%), NU (17.3%), FX (11.9%) age (> 25 y) with CTX for NU N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Aponte-Tinao et al. [2] 198 AL (OA and IC) 58% FX (15%), INF (14%), NU (12%), R (7%) N/A 40% (10 y) FX (13%), INF (11%), R (7%) OA and IC (tibia) 87% (47%-100%) N/A
Sanders et al. [33] 131 AL (IC) 63% Soft tissue (5%), NU (16%), FX (19%), IF (6%), INF (6%), R (11%) IM nail only, nonbridging plate for NU N/A Soft tissue, NU, FX: 14% (10 y), INF: 5% (15 y) N/A N/A N/A
Puerta-GarciaSandoval et al. [30] 45 AL (C) 23% INF (4%), R (16%), soft tissue failure (7%), AL (9%), IF (2%), NU (2%) N/A 20% N/A Stages IIA to IIIa Femur (79%), tibia (76%) N/A
Donati et al. [11] 62 AL (C) 52% INF (24%), extensor mechanism (15%), delayed union (13%) N/A 27% INF (19%), local R (5%), AL (3%) N/A Score > 65% (90%) N/A
Abdeen et al. [1] 36 AL (C) 11% Superficial INF (3%), AL (8%) N/A 8% AL (6%), NU (3%) N/A 87% Intra-articular resection
Van de Sande et al. [44] 38 AL (OA and C) 32% INF (8%), FX (8%), NU (5%), R (8%) N/A 42% N/A N/A OA (77%), C (72%) Preserving the adductor mechanism
Wu et al. [46] 164 IR, FZ (OA, IC, AD, HC, C) IR (44%), FZ (40%) IR: R (16%), NU (10%), INF (8%), soft tissue failure (8%); FZ: NU (13%), R (11%), FX (6%) N/A IR:83% (5 y), FZ: 84% (5 y) IR: IF (1%), FX (1%), INF (4%), R (9%); FZ: FX (1%), INF (2%), R (7%) N/A N/A N/A
Moran et al. [27] 11 IR (C) 36% NU (18%), R (18%) N/A 0% N/A 66% N/A
Outani et al. [28] 87 IR (OA, IC, AD, C) 65% Soft tissue (9%), NU (7%), structural failure (16%), INF (15%), R (2%) N/A 16% INF (5%), R (2%), NU (2%), FX (1%) N/A UE (73%), LE (83%) N/A
Sugiura et al. [36] 46 PZ (OA, IC, C) 45% INF (13%), FX (15%), NU (17%) VFG for NU and absorption 7% INF (4%), R (2%) no 83% HC
Lee et al. [23] 278 PZ (OA, IC, AD, HC, C) N/A N/A N/A 38% INF (13%), NU (7%), FX (6%), R (4%) N/A N/A N/A
Ikuta et al. [19] 24 PZ (IC) 75% NU (58%), INF (13%), absorption (21%), FX (4%) N/A 25% INF (8%), NU (4%), R (13%) N/A 76% N/A
This study 310 IR, PZ, FZ (IC, C) 42% (5 y) NU (21%), INF (20%), IF (14%), R (10%) Long resection (≥ 15 cm) for all complication, male and non-VG for NU 16% INF (6%), R (5%), NU (2%), IF (2%), FX (1%) N/A 88% Age (< 40 y), femur, tibia, no complication, no graft removal

aEnneking staging. AL = allograft; IR = irradiated; FZ = freezing; PZ = pasteurized; IC = intercalary; OA = osteoarticular; C = composite; AD = arthrodesis; HC = hemicortical; N/A = not available; NU = nonunion; FX = fracture; INF = infection; R = recurrence; IF = implant failure; AL = aseptic loosening; IM = intramedullary nail; CTX = chemotherapy; VFG = vascularized fibular graft; VG = vascularized graft.