Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Oct 11;12:e86452. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86452

GDF15 is required for cold-induced thermogenesis and contributes to improved systemic metabolic health following loss of OPA1 in brown adipocytes

Jayashree Jena 1,, Luis Miguel García-Peña 1,, Eric T Weatherford 1, Alex Marti 1, Sarah H Bjorkman 1, Kevin Kato 1, Jivan Koneru 1, Jason H Chen 1, Randy J Seeley 2, E Dale Abel 1,, Renata O Pereira 1,
Editors: Joel K Elmquist3, David E James4
PMCID: PMC10567111  PMID: 37819027

Abstract

We previously reported that mice lacking the protein optic atrophy 1 (OPA1 BKO) in brown adipose tissue (BAT) display induction of the activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), which promotes fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) secretion as a batokine. FGF21 increases metabolic rates under baseline conditions but is dispensable for the resistance to diet-induced obesity (DIO) reported in OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira et al., 2021). To determine alternative mediators of this phenotype, we performed transcriptome analysis, which revealed increased levels of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), along with increased protein kinase R (PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) levels in BAT. To investigate whether ATF4 induction was mediated by PERK and evaluate the contribution of GDF15 to the resistance to DIO, we selectively deleted PERK or GDF15 in OPA1 BKO mice. Mice with reduced OPA1 and PERK levels in BAT had preserved ISR activation. Importantly, simultaneous deletion of OPA1 and GDF15 partially reversed the resistance to DIO and abrogated the improvements in glucose tolerance. Furthermore, GDF15 was required to improve cold-induced thermogenesis in OPA1 BKO mice. Taken together, our data indicate that PERK is dispensable to induce the ISR, but GDF15 contributes to the resistance to DIO, and is required for glucose homeostasis and thermoregulation in OPA1 BKO mice by increasing energy expenditure.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

The integrated stress response (ISR) is a pro-survival signaling pathway present in eukaryotic cells, which is activated in response to a range of physiological and pathological stressors. Such stresses commonly include cell-extrinsic factors such as hypoxia, amino acid deprivation, glucose deprivation, and viral infection. However, cell-intrinsic stresses such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress (Pakos-Zebrucka et al., 2016), and mitochondrial stress can also activate the ISR (Bao et al., 2016; Quirós et al., 2017; Pereira et al., 2021). Induction of the ISR and its main effector activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) in response to various stress conditions frequently correlates with increased levels of the endocrine factors fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) in tissues, such as liver (Kang et al., 2021) and skeletal muscle (Ost et al., 2020). However, the upstream mechanisms mediating ISR induction in response to mitochondrial stress are unclear. Furthermore, the respective roles of FGF21 and GDF15 in the context of mitochondrial dysfunction are incompletely understood.

We recently reported that mitochondrial stress caused by deletion of the mitochondrial fusion protein optic atrophy 1 (OPA1 BKO) activated the ISR and induced its main effector ATF4 in brown adipose tissue (BAT). ATF4-mediated FGF21 induction was required to promote browning of inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) and improve thermoregulation in OPA1 BKO mice at baseline conditions. Although activation of the ISR in BAT led to resistance to diet-induced obesity (DIO) in an ATF4-dependent manner, this phenomenon was independent of FGF21 (Pereira et al., 2021). In the present study, we sought to investigate the upstream mechanisms mediating ISR activation in BAT in response to OPA1 deletion and the molecular mechanisms downstream of ATF4 mediating resistance to DIO.

Transcriptome analysis showed that the unfolded protein response (UPR), and specifically the protein kinase R (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), was induced in OPA1-deficient BAT. Given that PERK is shared by the ISR and the UPR (Pakos-Zebrucka et al., 2016), here, we tested the hypothesis that PERK is required for ATF4 induction in BAT. We also observed that in addition to FGF21, GDF15 was highly induced in BAT upon OPA1 deletion. Because GDF15 has been shown to regulate energy homeostasis in rodents (Tsai et al., 2018a; Chung et al., 2017b), here we tested the hypothesis that GDF15 is downstream of ATF4 and mediates the resistance to DIO in mice lacking OPA1 in thermogenic adipocytes. Our data reveal that PERK is dispensable for ISR and ATF4 induction in BAT in response to OPA1 deletion. Notably, GDF15 partially mediates the resistance to DIO, but is necessary for the improvement in glucose homeostasis and hepatic steatosis following high-fat feeding in OPA1 BKO mice. Furthermore, mice lacking GDF15 were unable to properly thermoregulate during cold exposure. Mechanistically, GDF15 deficiency abrogated browning of iWAT under obesogenic conditions and prevented the induction of calcium cycling in muscle, which likely contributes to increased weight gain and impaired thermogenesis in OPA1 BKO mice. These data underscore the complex regulation of systemic metabolism by various BAT-derived endocrine regulators that are released in response to mitochondrial stress and highlight novel roles for BAT-derived GDF15 in the regulation of energy homeostasis.

Results

OPA1 BKO mice have higher resting metabolic rates and are completely resistant to DIO

We have previously shown that OPA1 BKO mice have reduced body mass, increased resting metabolic rates, and are resistant to DIO (Pereira and McFarlane, 2019). To further characterize their metabolic phenotype, we analyzed indirect calorimetry data collected in 12-week-old male mice while housed under thermoneutral conditions and after 12 wk of high-fat feeding. Under isocaloric conditions and after being housed at thermoneutral conditions (30°C) for 7 d, 12-week-old OPA1 BKO mice had reduced body mass (Figure 1A), with no detectable changes in food intake (Figure 1B and Figure 1—figure supplement 1A) or locomotor activity (Figure 1C and Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Oxygen consumption (Figure 1D) and VCO2 production (Figure 1E) were unchanged between genotypes, regardless of time of day. Interestingly, respiratory exchange ratio was significantly higher in KO mice, indicating an increased relative preference for carbohydrates as energy substrate (Figure 1F and Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Although the averaged oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) (Figure 1D) and energy expenditure (Figure 1G and Figure 1—figure supplement 1D) values for the dark and light cycles were unchanged between genotypes, ANCOVA (Figure 1H) detected a significant group effect for the relationship between body mass and energy expenditure, indicating that the reduced body mass in KO mice is a result of higher metabolic rates. In response to high-fat feeding, weight gain is completely prevented in KO mice as shown in the body weight curve over time (Figure 1I). A subset of OPA1 BKO mice exemplifying this drastic abrogation of DIO (Figure 1J) was utilized for analysis of indirect calorimetry. Different than in our previously published study (Pereira and McFarlane, 2019), here we analyzed only mice fed high-fat diet (HFD), instead of simultaneously analyzing both HFD and control groups. Moreover, rather than representing the overall averaged data, we plotted the averaged data for the last 48 hr of data collection for each cycle of the day (light and dark). Surprisingly, although our previous analysis was unable to detect these changes, here we show that OPA1 BKO mice fed HFD for 12 wk had increased food intake (Figure 1K and Figure 1—figure supplement 1E and F) and locomotor activity (Figure 1L and Figure 1—figure supplement 1G) relative to their wild-type (WT) counterparts. Oxygen consumption (Figure 1M) and VCO2 production (Figure 1N) were unchanged between genotypes, and respiratory exchange ratio was elevated in KO mice fed HFD (Figure 1O and Figure 1—figure supplement 1H). Although the absolute energy expenditure values were unchanged between genotypes (Figure 1P and Figure 1—figure supplement 1I), ANCOVA revealed a leftward shift in the relationship between body weight and energy expenditure in OPA1 BKO mice with a nearly significant group effect (p=0.055) (Figure 1Q). Indeed, this was also the case when the relationship between body weight and oxygen consumption was determined by ANCOVA, which revealed a statistically significant group effect (Figure 1—figure supplement 1J). Thus, relative to total body mass, KO mice have higher energy expenditure and OCRs compared to WT animals. Together, this data confirms the hypothesis we put forth in our previous study (Pereira and McFarlane, 2019) that the increase in resting metabolic rates likely contributes to the resistance to DIO in OPA1 BKO mice.

Figure 1. OPA1 BKO mice have higher resting metabolic rates and are completely resistant to diet-induced obesity (DIO).

(A–D) Data collected on 12-week-old male OPA1 BKO mice. (A) Body mass. (B–G) Indirect calorimetry data represented as the average for the light and dark cycles during the last 48 hr of data recording. (B) Food intake. (C) Locomotor activity. (D) Oxygen consumption (VO2). (E) Carbon dioxide production (VCO2). (F) Respiratory exchange ratio. (G) Energy expenditure. (H) ANCOVA of energy expenditure as a function of body mass. (I–Q) Data collected on 18-week-old male OPA1 BKO mice fed high-fat diet (60% calories from fat) for 12 wk (diet started at 6 wk of age). (I) Body weight curve. (J) Final body weight (cohort used for indirect calorimetry data collection). (K–Q) Indirect calorimetry data represented as the average for the light and dark cycles during the last 48 hr of data recording. (K) Food intake. (L) Locomotor activity. (M) Oxygen consumption (VO2). (N) Carbon dioxide production (VCO2). (O) Respiratory exchange ratio. (P) Energy expenditure. (Q) ANCOVA of energy expenditure as a function of body mass. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. *Significantly different vs. wild-type (WT) mice.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Food consumption, locomotor activity, and energy expenditure in OPA1 BAT knockout (KO) mice under baseline conditions and following high-fat feeding.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A–D) Hourly indirect calorimetry data during the light and dark cycles in the last 48 hr of data recording. Data was collected from 12-week-old male OPA1 BAT KO and control mice, consuming normal chow. (A) Hourly food consumed. (B) Locomotor activity. (C) Respiratory exchange ratio. (D) Energy expenditure. (E–I) Hourly indirect calorimetry data during the light and dark cycles in the last 48 hr of data recording. Data was collected from 18-week-old male OPA1 BAT KO and wild-type (WT) control mice fed high-fat diet (HFD – 60% calories from fat) for 12 wk (diet started at 6 wk of age). (E) Hourly food consumption. (F) Cumulative food consumption. (G) Locomotor activity. (H) Respiratory exchange ratio. (I) Energy expenditure. (J) ANCOVA of oxygen consumption as a function of body mass for HFD mice. (K) Serum GDF15 levels in OPA1 BKO mice under baseline conditions, after cold exposure (3 d at 4°C) and after 12 wk of high-fat feeding. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences for the group effect were determined by ANCOVA using a significance level of p<0.05. One-Way ANOVA was used to determine the differences in GDF15 serum levels using a significance level of p<0.05. ** p <0.01. **** p <0.0001. Significantly different vs. WT RT.

Transcriptome analysis reveals induction of the UPR and GDF15 in mice lacking OPA1 in BAT

To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the favorable metabolic profile of OPA1 BKO mice, we performed bulk RNA sequencing (RNASeq) in BAT collected from 7-week-old male and female mice lacking OPA1 in thermogenic adipocytes (OPA1 BKO) and their respective WT littermate controls fed regular chow under ambient temperature conditions. Specifically, we were interested in identifying the mechanistic link between OPA1 deletion and induction of the ISR effector ATF4, and the molecular mechanism downstream of ATF4 that mediated resistance to DIO in OPA1 KO mice. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed that the ER stress pathway and the UPR were amongst the top 3 induced canonical pathways in OPA1-deficient BAT (Figure 2A). Fgf21, which we previously demonstrated was required for activation of browning of iWAT and to regulate changes in core body temperature at baseline conditions, but not for the resistance to DIO in OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira et al., 2021), and Gdf15 were among the top 25 upregulated genes in BAT in response to Opa1 deletion (Figure 2B). The ER kinase PERK was significantly enriched in OPA1 BKO mice (see the GEO database under the accession number GSE218907), as shown in the bar graph comparing the averaged transcripts per million (TPM) for WT and KO mice (Figure 2C). Furthermore, Gdf15 mRNA induction in OPA1 BKO mice was confirmed by qPCR (Figure 2D). Interestingly, mice lacking both ATF4 and OPA1 (OPA1/ATF4 DKO mice) in BAT (Figure 2D) had significantly lower levels of Gdf15 mRNA expression relative to OPA1 BKO mice. This data suggests that ATF4 at least partially regulates Gdf15 induction in OPA1-deficient BAT. Importantly, GDF15 serum levels were also induced in OPA1 BKO mice but were significantly attenuated in mice lacking both OPA1 and ATF4 in BAT (OPA1/ATF4) (Figure 2E). Conversely, GDF15 serum levels remained elevated in mice concomitantly lacking OPA1 and FGF21 in BAT (Figure 2F). These are important control groups as mice lacking both OPA1 and ATF4 in BAT are no longer resistant to DIO, while mice lacking OPA1 and FGF21 in BAT remain lean when fed HFD (Pereira et al., 2021). It is noteworthy that the degree of GDF15 induction observed in OPA1 BKO mice is similar to that observed after cold exposure or prolonged high-fat feeding and is not further increased by these stressors (Figure 1—figure supplement 1K). Together, these data led us to hypothesize that PERK could be the ISR kinase regulating ATF4 induction, and that GDF15 is a downstream target of ATF4 mediating the resistance to DIO in OPA1 BKO mice.

Figure 2. Transcriptome analysis reveals induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and GDF15 in mice lacking OPA1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT).

Figure 2.

(A–C) Data collected from BAT of 7-week-old male and female OPA1 BKO mice. (A) Bubble plot showing the top 10 canonical pathways from the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) database containing genes with a significant overlap (adjusted p-value≤0.05) to those differentially expressed in OPA1 BKO mice. Size of the bubble indicates the -log of the adjusted p-value (Benjamini–Hochberg) from the pathway analysis. Plotted on the x-axis is the ratio of differentially expressed genes relative to the number of genes in the pathway. The bubble color indicates the z-score, which indicates the predicted activation (positive) or inhibition (negative) of the pathway based on the directionality of the gene changes in OPA1 BKO relative to wild-type (WT) mice. (B) Heatmap of the top 25 differentially expressed genes in OPA1 BKO mice. (C) Bar graph showing the Log2 transcript per million (TPM) for the Eif2ka3 gene (encoding PERK). (D) Relative mRNA expression of Gdf15 in BAT of OPA1 BKO and in OPA1/ATF4 BAT DKO mice normalized to tata box protein (Tbp) expression. (E) GDF15 serum levels in OPA1 BKO, OPA1/ATF4 BAT DKO, and OPA1/FGF21 BAT DKO mice. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01. Significantly different vs. WT mice or from OPA1 KO.

PERK is dispensable for the ISR activation in OPA1 BKO mice

Because the ER kinase PERK is shared by the UPR and the ISR, and is transcriptionally induced in OPA1 BKO mice (Pakos-Zebrucka et al., 2016), we hypothesized that activation of the PERK arm of the UPR is required to induce the ISR and ATF4 in OPA1 BKO mice. To test this hypothesis, we generated mice concomitantly lacking both OPA1 and PERK in thermogenic adipocytes (OPA1/PERK BAT DKO) (Figure 3A). When we downregulated PERK expression in BAT of OPA1 BKO mice, phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2α, which is required for ATF4 translation, remained significantly elevated (Figure 3B). Accordingly, expression of the ISR genes Atf4, Ddit3, Fgf21, and Gdf15 was induced in BAT (Figure 3C), which correlated with a significant increase in GDF15 serum levels (Figure 3D). As observed in OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira et al., 2021), expression of thermogenic genes was attenuated in BAT under baseline conditions (room temperature and regular chow feeding) (Figure 3E), and UCP1 protein levels were significantly reduced (Figure 3F). State 3 pyruvate/malate-supported mitochondrial respirations were significantly impaired in mitochondria isolated from DKO BAT (Figure 3G). Next, we investigated whether PERK deletion in the OPA1 BKO background would affect browning of iWAT. Expression of thermogenic genes (Figure 3H) was induced in the iWAT of DKO mice. Consistently, uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) levels (Figure 3I) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) levels (Figure 3J) were also elevated in iWAT of OPA1/PERK BAT DKO mice, indicating increased compensatory browning. Metabolically, OPA1/PERK BAT DKO mice had reduced body mass (Figure 3K) and total fat mass (Figure 3L), with unchanged total lean mass (Figure 3M) at 20 wk of age under baseline conditions. These changes were the same as those observed in OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira and McFarlane, 2019). Together, these data suggest that PERK is dispensable for ATF4 induction in BAT or for the changes in energy metabolism, resulting in reduced body mass in OPA1 BKO mice under baseline conditions. Therefore, alternative ISR kinases are likely required to activate the ISR and its main effector ATF4 in BAT in response to OPA1 deletion.

Figure 3. PERK is dispensable for the integrated stress response (ISR) activation in OPA1 BKO mice.

Figure 3.

(A–G) Data collected from 8-week-old OPA1/PERK BAT double-knockout (DKO) male and female mice. (A) Representative immunoblots for OPA1 and PERK protein in brown adipose tissue (BAT) normalized to GAPDH and their respective densitometric quantification. (B) Representative immunoblots for phospho-eIF2α (peIF2α) normalized to total eIF2α protein levels in BAT and the respective densitometric quantification. Optical density (OD). (C) Relative mRNA expression of the ISR genes Atf4, Ddit3, Fgf21, and Gdf15 normalized to Tbp expression in BAT. (D) GDF15 serum levels (ad libitum-fed conditions). (E) Relative mRNA expression of the thermogenic genes normalized to tata box protein (Tbp) expression in BAT. (F) Representative immunoblots for uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) protein levels in BAT normalized to β-actin and the respective densitometric quantification. (G) ADP-stimulated (state 3) pyruvate-malate-supported oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) in mitochondria isolated from BAT. (H) Relative mRNA expression of the thermogenic genes normalized to Tbp expression in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (I) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in iWAT normalized to β-actin and the respective densitometric quantification. (J) Representative immunoblots for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) protein levels in iWAT normalized to β-actin and the respective densitometric quantification. OD, optical density. (K–M) Data collected in 20-week-old male DKO mice. (K) Body mass. (L) Total fat mass. (M) Total lean mass. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. *Significantly different vs. wild-type (WT) mice.

Figure 3—source data 1. PERK is dispensable for the integrated stress response (ISR) activation in OPA1 BKO mice.
(A) Full immunoblot images for OPA1, PERK, and GAPDH in brown adipose tissue (BAT) (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled). (B) Full immunoblot images for pEif2a and Eif2a in BAT. (F) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in BAT. (I) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (J) Full immunoblot images for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and β-actin in iWAT.
Figure 3—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for OPA1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for PERK in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for GAPDH in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for peIF2α in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total eIF2α in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 8. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 9. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 10. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 11. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 3—source data 12. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.

OPA1/PERK BAT DKO mice are resistant to DIO and insulin resistance

Although attenuation of PERK expression did not affect activation of the ISR in BAT, or the baseline changes in body composition observed in OPA1 BKO mice, we sought to determine whether simultaneous deletion of PERK and OPA1 in BAT would attenuate the resistance to DIO observed in OPA1 BKO mice. Therefore, we fed OPA1/PERK BAT DKO mice HFD for 12 wk. Like OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira et al., 2021), DKO mice were completely resistant to DIO, as demonstrated by overlapping weight curves between DKO and OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 4A). Relative to HFD controls, final body mass (Figure 4B) and percent fat mass were reduced (Figure 4C), and percent lean mass increased in DKO mice (Figure 4D), indicating reduced body mass at the expense of reduced fat mass. In contrast to OPA1 BKO mice, food intake was statistically unchanged between DKO mice and their WT littermate controls, although it trended higher (Figure 4E and Figure 4—figure supplement 1A and B). Locomotor activity was increased in DKO mice, as was the case in OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 4F and Figure 4—figure supplement 1C and D). Oxygen consumption (Figure 4G) and VCO2 (Figure 4H) were unchanged between genotypes, regardless of the time of the day. Interestingly, in contrast to OPA1 BKO mice fed HFD, respiratory exchange ratio was significantly lower in DKO mice during the light cycle, indicating a relative increased preference for fatty acids as energy substrate (Figure 4I and Figure 4—figure supplement 1E). The averaged values for energy expenditure were unchanged between genotypes (Figure 4J and Figure 4—figure supplement 1F). However, ANCOVA revealed a leftward shift in the relationship of energy expenditure as a function of body mass in the OPA1/PERK BAT DKO mice, which was significantly different for the group effect (Figure 4K). These data indicate that increased resting metabolic rates in OPA1/PERK BAT DKO mice, as in OPA1 BKO mice, likely contribute to the reduced body weight observed in these mice. OPA1 BKO mice had significantly improved glucose homeostasis and insulin tolerance after 12 wk of HFD (Pereira et al., 2021). Likewise, glucose (Figure 4L and M) and insulin intolerance (Figure 4N and O) were ameliorated in high-fat-fed OPA1/PERK BAT DKO. Thus, PERK is dispensable for the resistance to DIO and for the associated systemic metabolic improvements observed in OPA1 BKO mice.

Figure 4. OPA1/PERK brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice are resistant to DIO and insulin resistance.

(A–O) Data collected in OPA1/PERK BAT DKO male mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 wk. (A) Body weight curve comparing wild-type (WT), OPA1 BKO, and OPA1/PERK BAT DKO mice. (B) Final body weight. (C) Percent fat mass. (D) Percent lean mass. (E–K) Indirect calorimetry data represented as the average for the light and dark cycles during the last 48 hr of data recording. (E) Food intake. (F) Locomotor activity. (G) Oxygen consumption (VO2). (H) Carbon dioxide production (VCO2). (I) Respiratory exchange ratio. (J) Energy expenditure. (K) ANCOVA of energy expenditure as a function of body mass. (L) Glucose tolerance test (GTT). (M) Area under the curve (AUC) for the GTT. (N) Insulin tolerance test (ITT). (O) AUC for the ITT. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. *Significantly different vs. WT mice.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Food consumption locomotor activity and energy expenditure in OPA1/PERK brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A–F) Hourly indirect calorimetry data during the light and dark cycles in the last 48 hr of data recording. Data was collected from 18-week-old male OPA1/PERK BAT DKO and wild-type (WT) control mice fed high-fat diet (60% calories from fat) for 12 wk (diet started at 6 wk of age). (A) Hourly food consumption. (B) Cumulative food consumption. (C) Locomotor activity. (D) Cumulative distance in the cage. (E) Respiratory exchange ratio. (F) Energy expenditure. Data are expressed as means ± SEM.

GDF15 expression in thermogenic adipocytes is not required to regulate energy metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and core body temperature under baseline conditions

Our transcriptomics data show that Gdf15 mRNA levels are highly induced in OPA1 BKO mice, and its induction is attenuated in the absence of ATF4, suggesting partial dependence on ATF4 for GDF15 regulation (Figure 2D and E). Given GDF15’s known effects on energy metabolism in rodents (Tsai et al., 2018b), we sought to test the hypothesis that GDF15 induction in OPA1 BKO is required to mediate the resistance to DIO. Prior to analyzing the impact of GDF15 deficiency on the adaptation of BAT to OPA1 loss, we determined whether GDF15 deletion in BAT alone would influence systemic metabolic homeostasis under baseline conditions. Thus, we analyzed mice lacking GDF15 exclusively in UCP1-expressing adipocytes (GDF15 BKO mice). Our data confirms selective downregulation of Gdf15 mRNA levels in BAT (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A), but not in iWAT (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B) at room temperature. Under these conditions, deletion of GDF15 in brown adipocytes does not affect circulating levels of GDF15 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1C) or core body temperature in mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1D). Furthermore, body mass (Figure 5—figure supplement 1E), total fat mass (Figure 5—figure supplement 1F), and total lean mass (Figure 5—figure supplement 1G) were similar between GDF15 BKO mice and their WT littermate controls. Moreover, glucose homeostasis, as measured by the glucose tolerance test (GTT) (Figure 5—figure supplement 1H and I) and fasting blood glucose levels (Figure 5—figure supplement 1J), was unaffected by GDF15 deletion in thermogenic adipocytes in young mice (6 wk) fed regular chow. These data indicate that GDF15 deletion in thermogenic adipocytes does not alter systemic metabolism and core body temperature in WT mice fed regular chow under ambient temperature conditions.

OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice have similar metabolic phenotype as OPA1 BKO mice under baseline conditions

Our data confirmed that increased GDF15 circulating levels in OPA1 KO mice were derived from BAT. mRNA expression demonstrated a significant reduction in Opa1 and Gdf15 levels in BAT of OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice (Figure 5A), which completely normalized GDF15 serum levels (Figure 5B). In young mice (6–8 wk), BAT mass was slightly elevated in DKO mice (Figure 5C). Morphologically, BAT tissue had an increased number of adipocytes with unilocular lipid droplets (Figure 5D), indicating increased whitening, and BAT mitochondria appeared smaller, less electron dense, and had disrupted cristae structure (Figure 5E), that were similar to changes observed in OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira and McFarlane, 2019). Expression of thermogenic genes at baseline conditions was unchanged in BAT of DKO, except for a small increase in Ucp1 mRNA levels (Figure 5F). However, UCP1 protein levels in BAT were comparable between WT and DKO mice (Figure 5G). Similar to OPA1 BKO mice, mitochondrial OCRs were significantly reduced in mitochondria isolated from BAT (Figure 5H) and mRNA expression of the ISR genes Atf4, Ddit3, and Fgf21 was elevated in DKO mice (Figure 5I), which correlated with increased FGF21 serum levels (Figure 5J). Compensatory browning of iWAT, as demonstrated by histology (Figure 5K), elevated expression of thermogenic genes (Figure 5L) and increased UCP1 protein levels (Figure 5M) in iWAT, persisted upon GDF15 deletion in the OPA1 BKO background. Tyrosine hydroxylase protein levels, a proxy for sympathetic activation, were elevated in iWAT from DKO mice under baseline conditions (Figure 5N), as was observed in OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira et al., 2021). Under isocaloric and room temperature conditions, body mass was unchanged at 6 and 10 wk of age but was significantly reduced in 20-week-old DKO mice relative to their WT littermate controls (Figure 5O). To test whether GDF15 is required to mediate changes in energy metabolism in OPA BAT KO mice under baseline conditions, 10–12-week-old-mice were housed at thermoneutral conditions (30°C) for 7 d prior to having indirect calorimetry assessed in metabolic chambers. While food intake was unchanged in OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 1B), it was slightly reduced in DKO mice during the light cycle (Figure 5P and Figure 5—figure supplement 2A and B). Locomotor activity (Figure 5Q and Figure 5—figure supplement 2C) and averaged energy expenditure were similar between genotypes (Figure 5R and Figure 5—figure supplement 2D). Although body mass was unchanged at this time point, oxygen consumption was slightly increased in DKO mice during the dark cycle (Figure 5S), indicating increased metabolic rates. Indeed, ANCOVA shows a significant group effect for the relationship between oxygen consumption and body mass (Figure 5—figure supplement 2E), as was also observed in OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira et al., 2021). Carbon dioxide production was similar between genotypes (Figure 5T), but respiratory exchange ratio, which was increased in OPA1 BKO mice under the same conditions (Figure 1F), was reduced in DKO mice during the light cycle (Figure 5U and Figure 5—figure supplement 2F). These data suggest that GDF15 is largely dispensable in regulating resting metabolic rates in OPA1 BKO mice under baseline conditions, but surprisingly, normalization of GDF15 circulating levels led to reduced food intake and switched fuel preference during the light cycle. Glucose homeostasis as measured by the GTT (Figure 5—figure supplement 2G and H) and fasting glucose levels (Figure 5—figure supplement 2I) was similar between DKO mice and their WT controls.

Figure 5. OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice have similar metabolic phenotype as OPA1 BKO mice under baseline conditions.

(A–O) Data collected in OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) DKO mice under baseline conditions (room temperature or 30°C/regular chow). (A) Relative mRNA expression of Opa1 and Gdf15 in BAT normalized to tata box protein (Tbp) expression. (B). GDF15 serum levels (ad libitum-fed conditions). (C) BAT mass relative to body mass in 8-week-old mice. (D) Representative images of H&E-stained histological sections of BAT (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (E) Electron micrographs of BAT. Scale bar = 2 µm. (F) Relative mRNA expression of the thermogenic genes in BAT normalized to Tbp expression. (G) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in BAT normalized to β-actin, and their respective densitometric quantification. Optical density (OD). (H) ADP-stimulated (state 3) pyruvate-malate-supported oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) in mitochondria isolated from BAT. (I) Relative mRNA expression of the integrated stress response (ISR) genes Atf4, Ddit3, and Fgf21 normalized to Tbp expression. (J) FGF21 serum levels (ad libitum-fed conditions). (K) Representative images of H&E-stained histological sections of inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (L) Relative mRNA expression of the thermogenic genes in iWAT normalized to Tbp expression. (M) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in iWAT normalized to β-actin and their respective densitometric quantification. (N) Representative immunoblots for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in iWAT normalized to β-actin and their respective densitometric quantification. OD, optical density. (O) Body mass at 8, 10, and 20 wk of age. (P–U) Indirect calorimetry data represented as the average for the light and dark cycles during the last 48 hr of data recording in male mice around 10–12 wk of age. (P) Food intake. (Q) Locomotor activity. (R) Energy expenditure. (S) Oxygen consumption (VO2). (T) Carbon dioxide production (VCO2). (U) Respiratory exchange ratio. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. *Significantly different vs. wild-type (WT) mice.

Figure 5—source data 1. OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice have similar metabolic phenotype as OPA1 BKO mice under baseline conditions (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled).
(G) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in BAT. (M) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (N) Full immunoblot images for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and β-actin in iWAT.
Figure 5—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in BAT of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO mice).
Figure 5—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in BAT of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 5—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 5—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 5—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 5—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. GDF15 expression in wild-type thermogenic adipocytes does not influence energy metabolism, glucose homeostasis and core body temperature under baseline conditions.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A–J) Data collected in 6-week-old GDF15 BKO male mice and their wild-type (WT) control fed regular chow and under ambient temperature conditions. (A) Relative mRNA expression of Gdf15 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) normalized to tata box protein (Tbp). (B) Relative mRNA expression of Gdf15 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) normalized to Tbp. (C) GDF15 serum levels. (D) Core body temperatures measured with a rectal probe. (E) Body mass. (F) Total fat mass. (G) Total lean mass. (H) Glucose tolerance test (GTT). (I) Area under the curve (AUC) for the GTT. (J) Fasting blood glucose levels. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. *Significantly different vs. wild-type (WT) mice.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Metabolic phenotyping of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice under baseline conditions.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

(A–F) Hourly indirect calorimetry data in the light and dark cycles during the last 48 hr of data recording. Data were collected in male DKO and wild-type (WT) control mice between 10–12 wk of age (baseline conditions). (A) Hourly food intake. (B) Cumulative food consumption. (C) Locomotor activity. (D) Energy expenditure. (E) ANCOVA of oxygen consumption as a function of body mass. (F) Respiratory exchange ratio. (G) Glucose tolerance test (GTT). (H) Area under the curve (AUC) for the GTT. (I) Fasting glucose levels. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences for the group effect were determined by ANCOVA using a significance level of p<0.05.

GDF15 partially mediates the resistance to DIO and is required to improve glucose homeostasis in OPA1 BKO mice

Given the role of GDF15 in energy homeostasis (Chung et al., 2017b; Chrysovergis et al., 2014) and the increase in GDF15 circulating levels in OPA1 BKO mice, we tested the hypothesis that BAT-derived GDF15 is required to mediate resistance to DIO in OPA1 BKO mice. Male WT and DKO mice were fed a HFD (60% calories from fat) for 12 wk. Body mass gain over time was significantly attenuated in DKO relative to their WT littermate controls, but DKO mice gained significantly more weight than OPA1 BKO mice after 12 wk of high-fat feeding (Figure 6A). Final body mass (Figure 6B) and total fat mass (Figure 6C) were also significantly reduced in DKO mice relative to WT mice, while total lean mass was unchanged (Figure 6D). These data suggest that GDF15 partially mediates the resistance to DIO observed in OPA1 BKO mice. To gain insight into the mechanisms contributing to these changes in weight gain, we placed a subset of high-fat-fed WT and DKO in metabolic chambers. In contrast to OPA1 BKO mice, in which food intake was increased (Figure 1C), food intake in DKO mice tended to be lower (Figure 6E and Figure 6—figure supplement 1A and B). Also, in contrast to OPA1 BKO, locomotor activity (Figure 6F and Figure 6—figure supplement 1C and D) was unchanged between WT and DKO mice. Energy expenditure was also similar between genotypes (Figure 6G and Figure 6—figure supplement 1E and F). While in OPA1 BKO mice ANCOVA revealed a near significant group effect for energy expenditure as a function of body mass (Figure 1Q), in the DKO mice, ANCOVA detected no significant differences for the group effect (Figure 6—figure supplement 1G). The averaged oxygen consumption (Figure 5H) and CO2 production (Figure 5I) for the light and dark cycles were similar between genotypes. Interestingly, the increase in RER observed in OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 1O) was no longer observed in the absence of BAT GDF15 (Figure 6J and Figure 6—figure supplement 1H). These data suggest that GDF15 is required to mediate the increase in resting metabolic rates observed in OPA1 BKO mice and regulates fuel preference. Although body mass was significantly reduced in DKO mice relative to WT mice, glucose homeostasis, as demonstrated by the GTT (Figure 6K and L) and fasting glucose levels (Figure 6M), was similarly impaired in WT and DKO mice. Likewise, diet-induced hepatic triglyceride accumulation was comparable between WT and DKO mice (Figure 6N). However, insulin sensitivity was significantly improved in DKO mice, as shown by the decreased serum fasting insulin levels (Figure 6O) and reduced area under the curve for the insulin tolerance test (ITT) (Figure 6P and Q). Although under baseline conditions the expression of thermogenic genes in BAT was largely preserved, upon high-fat feeding, several thermogenic genes were downregulated (Figure 6R) and UCP1 protein levels were reduced in BAT (Figure 6) of DKO mice. In iWAT, Ucp1 mRNA levels were elevated in DKO mice (Figure 6T), but UCP1 protein levels, which were highly induced under baseline conditions, were undetectable after high-fat feeding in DKO mice (Figure 6U). Nonetheless, UCP1 protein levels were significantly induced in iWAT of OPA1 BKO mice after 12 wk on HFD (Figure 6—figure supplement 1I). Furthermore, expression of the calcium pump Serca1, which is involved in non-shivering thermogenesis and was recently shown to be induced in muscle by GDF15 administration (Wang et al., 2023), was induced in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 6—figure supplement 1J), but not in DKO mice (Figure 6V). Our data suggest that BAT-derived GDF15 is required to sustain browning of iWAT under obesogenic conditions in the OPA1 BKO background and likely regulates calcium cycling in muscle contributing to the increased metabolic rates in these mice.

Figure 6. GDF15 partially mediates the resistance to diet-induced obesity (DIO) and is required to improve glucose homeostasis in OPA1 BKO mice.

(A–O) Data collected in OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) male mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 wk. (A) Body weight curve comparing wild-type (WT), OPA1 BKO, and OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO mice. (B) Final body mass. (C) Total fat mass. (D) Total lean mass. (E–J) Indirect calorimetry data represented as the average for the light and dark cycles during the last 48 hr of data recording. (E) Food intake. (F) Locomotor activity. (G) Energy expenditure. (H) Oxygen consumption (VO2). (I) Carbon dioxide production (VCO2). (J) Respiratory exchange ratio. (K) Glucose tolerance test (GTT). (L) Area under the curve (AUC) for the GTT. (M) Fasting glucose levels. (N) Liver triglycerides levels. (O) Fasting insulin levels. (P) Insulin tolerance test (ITT). (Q) AUC for the ITT. (R) Relative mRNA expression of thermogenic genes in BAT normalized to tata box protein (Tbp) expression. (S) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in BAT normalized to β-actin and their respective densitometric quantification. Optical Density (OD). (T) Relative mRNA expression of thermogenic genes in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) normalized to Tbp expression. (U) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in iWAT normalized to β-actin. OD, optical density. (V) Representative immunoblots for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle normalized to Ponceau red staining and their respective densitometric quantification. OD, optical density. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. *Significantly different vs. WT mice.

Figure 6—source data 1. GDF15 partially mediates the resistance to diet-induced obesity (DIO) and is required to improve glucose homeostasis in OPA1 BKO mice (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled).
(S) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in brown adipose tissue (BAT). (U) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (V) Full immunoblot for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle and Ponceau red staining.
Figure 6—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
Figure 6—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
Figure 6—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
Figure 6—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
Figure 6—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for Serca1 in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
Figure 6—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for Ponceau red staining for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Indirect calorimetry data and immunoblot for thermogenic markers in white adipose tissue (iWAT) and skeletal muscle.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A–H) Hourly indirect calorimetry data during the light and dark cycles in the last 48 hr of data recording. Data was collected from 18-week-old male OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) and wild-type (WT) control mice fed high-fat diet (HFD) (60% calories from fat) for 12 wk (diet started at 6 wk of age). (A) Hourly food consumption. (B) Cumulative food consumption. (C) Locomotor activity. (D) Cumulative distance in the cage. (E) Hourly energy expenditure. (F) Cumulative energy expenditure. (G) ANCOVA of oxygen consumption as a function of body mass. (H) Respiratory exchange ratio. (I) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in iWAT normalized to β-actin in OPA1 BAT KO mice after 12 wk of HFD and their respective densitometric quantification. (J) Representative immunoblots for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle normalized to Ponceau red staining in OPA1 BAT KO mice after 12 wk of HFD and their respective densitometric quantification. Optical density (OD). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by ANCOVA for the group effect and by Student’s t-test for the immunoblots using a significance level of p<0.05. *Significantly different vs. WT mice.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Immunoblots for thermogenic markers in iWAT and gastrocnemius muscle.
(I) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice. (J) Full immunoblot images for Serca1a and Ponceau red staining in gastrocnemius muscle of WT and OPA1 BAT KO mice.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original immunoblot image for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original immunoblot image for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 4. Original immunoblot image for Serca1a in gastrocnemius of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 5. Original immunoblot image for Ponceau red staining for Serca1a in gastrocnemius of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.

GDF15 is required to regulate core body temperature in cold-exposed OPA1 BKO mice

Expression of thermogenic genes is reduced in BAT of DKO mice after DIO (Figure 6R), suggesting that thermogenic activation of BAT is impaired in these animals. We, therefore, tested whether core body temperature would be affected in DKO mice at thermoneutrality and in response to cold stress. After 7 d at 30°C, core body temperature, as measured by telemetry, was similar between WT and DKO mice (Figure 7A). Conversely, when housed at 4°C, DKO mice became severely hypothermic, with only two mice surviving past the first 24 hr of cold exposure. Indeed, the averaged core body temperature for the initial 24 hr at 4°C was significantly lower in DKO mice relative to their WT counterparts (Figure 7B). To capture the changes in core body temperature in all mice, we also plotted the last temperature recorded per mouse, which was greatly reduced in DKO mice (Figure 7C). Indirect calorimetry during the first 24 hr of cold exposure showed no significant differences in oxygen consumption for OPA1 BKO (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A) or OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO mice (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B), although VO2 started declining in DKO mice towards the end of the dark cycle. The averaged energy expenditure for the light and dark cycles during the first 24 hr of cold exposures were not significantly different between WT and DKO mice (Figure 7D). In contrast, respiratory exchange ratio, which was unchanged in OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 7—figure supplement 1C), was reduced in DKO mice, demonstrating an increased relative preference for fatty acids as energy substrate (Figure 7E and Figure 7—figure supplement 1D). Food intake was unchanged in OPA1 BKO (Figure 7—figure supplement 1E) and DKO mice (Figure 7F and Figure 7—figure supplement 1F) relative to their WT controls, while locomotor activity was increased during the light cycle in DKO mice (Figure 7G and Figure 7—figure supplement 1H), but not in OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 7—figure supplement 1G) (mice that died within the first 24 hr of cold exposure were removed from these analyses). In a separate cohort of mice housed at 30°C for 7 d, we used a rectal probe to measure core body temperatures prior to cold exposure (time 0) and hourly after ambient temperature was switched to 4°C (for up to 5 hr). Our data shows a precipitous decline in core body temperature in DKO mice, starting at 4 hr post-cold exposure (Figure 7H). This phenotype is the opposite of what we previously reported for OPA1 BKO mice, which had increased core body temperature at thermoneutrality and were better able to maintain core body temperature after cold exposure (Pereira et al., 2021). After 5 hr, animals were euthanized, and tissues were harvested for analysis. mRNA levels of Ucp1 and Dio2 were significantly reduced in BAT of DKO mice, while Fgf21 mRNA levels were elevated (Figure 7I). Nonetheless, UCP1 protein levels (Figure 7J) in BAT were unchanged between genotypes. Although UCP1 levels were also unchanged under baseline conditions (Figure 5G), UCP1-dependent respirations were markedly inhibited in DKO mice (Figure 7K), indicating impaired UCP1-mediated thermogenesis. Surprisingly, mRNA expression of thermogenic genes (Figure 7L) and protein levels of UCP1 were induced in the iWAT of DKO mice (Figure 7M), suggesting increased browning. Because induction of browning of iWAT normally occurs after longer periods of cold exposure (Fisher et al., 2012), we believe that this increase in thermogenic markers reflects the high baseline compensatory browning of iWAT already observed in DKO mice housed at room temperature conditions (Figure 5L–M). TH levels in iWAT were similar between genotypes, likely because of cold-induced TH levels in WT mice (Figure 7—figure supplement 1I). It was recently shown that recombinant GDF15 administration in mice can increase energy expenditure in muscle via induction of calcium cycling pathways (Wang et al., 2023). Indeed, we observed that OPA1 BKO mice have higher levels of Serca1a, a marker of muscle thermogenesis, in gastrocnemius muscle (Figure 7—figure supplement 1J). However, in DKO mice, protein levels of Serca1a were similar to WT levels in gastrocnemius muscle after acute cold exposure (Figure 7N), suggesting that GDF15 is required for Serca1a induction in the OPA1 BKO background. GLUT1 levels, which are also normally induced during muscle-mediated thermogenesis, were comparable between WT and DKO mice after cold exposure (Figure 7—figure supplement 1J). Taken together, these data indicate that GDF15 induction in BAT is required to regulate core body temperature in cold-exposed OPA1 BKO mice. Although browning of iWAT was preserved after acute cold exposure, the induction of Serca1a in muscle was prevented in DKO mice. Further studies will be required to determine the mechanisms for GDF15-mediated thermoregulation in OPA1 BKO mice, but our data suggest that muscle thermogenesis via futile calcium cycling might contribute to this phenotype.

Figure 7. GDF15 is required to regulate core body temperature in cold-exposed OPA1 BKO mice.

(A) Averaged core body temperature (light and dark cycles) collected from 12-week-old wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice after 7 d at 30°C. (B) Averaged core body temperature (light and dark cycles) in mice cold exposed for 24 hr (4°C). (C) Final core body temperature recorded by telemetry in mice exposed to 4°C in the CLAMS system. (D–G) Indirect calorimetry data represented as the average for the light and dark cycles during the first 24 hr of data recording (4°C). (D) Energy expenditure. (E) Respiratory exchange ratio. (F) Food intake. (G) Locomotor activity. (H) Hourly core body temperatures collected from 12-week-old WT and DKO mice during cold exposure (4°C). (I–N) Data collected after 5 hr of cold exposure. (I) Relative mRNA expression of thermogenic genes in BAT after 5 hr of cold exposure normalized to tata box protein (Tbp). (J) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in BAT normalized to β-actin and their respective densitometric quantification. (K) Pyruvate-malate-supported oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) and UCP1-dependent respirations in mitochondria isolated from BAT (baseline conditions). (L) Relative mRNA expression of thermogenic genes in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) normalized to Tbp expression. (M) Representative immunoblots for UCP1 in iWAT normalized to β-actin and their respective densitometric quantification. (N) Representative immunoblots for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle normalized to Ponceau red staining and their respective densitometric quantification. Optical density (OD). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test using a significance level of p<0.05. * p <0.05; ** p <0.01. Significantly different vs. WT mice.

Figure 7—source data 1. GDF15 is required to regulate core body temperature in cold-exposed OPA1 BKO mice (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled).
(G) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in brown adipose tissue (BAT). (M) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (N) Full immunoblot for Serca1a and β-actin in gastrocnemius muscle.
Figure 7—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
Figure 7—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
Figure 7—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
Figure 7—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
Figure 7—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for Serca1 in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
Figure 7—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Indirect calorimetry, food intake, locomotor activity, and skeletal muscle characterization of cold-exposed OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) and OPA1 BAT knockout (KO) mice.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A–H) Hourly indirect calorimetry data collected in OPA1 BKO and OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO mice and their respective wild-type (WT) controls during the first 24 hr of cold exposure. (A) Oxygen consumption in OPA1 BKO mice. (B) Oxygen consumption in DKO mice. (C) Respiratory exchange ratio in OPA1 BKO mice. (D) Respiratory exchange ratio in DKO mice. (E) Food consumed in OPA1 BKO mice. (F) Food consumed in DKO mice. (G) Locomotor activity in OPA1 BKO mice. (H) Locomotor activity in DKO mice. (I) Representative immunoblots for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) from mice exposed to 4°C for 5 hr normalized to β-actin and their respective densitometric quantification. (J) Representative immunoblots for GLUT1 in skeletal muscle from mice exposed to 4°C for 5 hr normalized to β-actin and their respective densitometric quantification. Optical density (OD). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were determined by ANCOVA for the group effect.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. I Full immunoblot images for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
(J) Full immunoblot images for GLUT1 and β-actin in skeletal muscle of WT and OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO mice.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original immunoblot image for tyrosine hydroxylase in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original immunoblot image for β-actin for tyrosine hydroxylase in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 4. Original immunoblot image for GLUT1 in gastrocnemius muscle of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 5. Original immunoblot image for β-actin for GLUT1 in gastrocnemius muscle of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.

Discussion

In our recently published study, we showed that deletion of the mitochondrial fusion protein OPA1 in brown adipocytes impaired thermogenic capacity in BAT, while paradoxically improving thermoregulation and promoting increased metabolic fitness in mice. These adaptations were mediated by the main effector of the ISR, ATF4, partially via the induction of FGF21 as a batokine. Nonetheless, the resistance to DIO and improvements in glucose homeostasis observed in OPA1-deficient mice occurred in an ATF4-dependent, but FGF21-independent manner (Pereira et al., 2021). Moreover, the molecular mechanisms leading to activation of the ISR in OPA1 BKO mice remained incompletely understood. Therefore, in the present study, we sought to investigate the molecular mechanisms mediating ISR induction and the mechanisms downstream of ATF4 promoting resistance to DIO in mice lacking OPA1 in thermogenic adipocytes.

The ISR can be induced by four different eIF2α kinases that act as early responders to disturbances in cellular homeostasis. Each kinase responds to distinct environmental and physiological stresses, which reflects their unique regulatory mechanisms (Pakos-Zebrucka et al., 2016). We and others have shown induction of the ISR downstream of mitochondrial stress, but the mechanisms mediating this induction are incompletely understood (Pereira et al., 2021; Ost et al., 2020; Forsström et al., 2019; Ost et al., 2016). RNASeq data in OPA1-deficient BAT indicated an increase in ER stress pathways and activation of the UPR in OPA1 BKO mice. Indeed, of the four different ISR kinases, the ER kinase PERK was the only one significantly enriched in our transcriptome analysis of OPA1-deficient BAT. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that PERK, an eIF2α kinase shared by the UPR and the ISR, is required for ATF4 induction in OPA1-deficient BAT. Our data in mice demonstrated that, although ER stress is increased in response to OPA1 deletion, PERK is dispensable for eIF2α phosphorylation and ISR induction in OPA1-deficient BAT. Therefore, mice concomitantly lacking OPA1 and PERK in BAT display similar improvements in systemic metabolic health as observed in OPA1 BKO mice, including increased metabolic rates, browning of iWAT, and resistance to DIO and IR. These data suggest that an alternative ISR kinase is likely activated downstream of mitochondrial stress to induce the ISR in BAT when OPA1 is deleted. Indeed, a recent study revealed that mitochondrial dysfunction induces different paths to promote ISR activation, depending on both the nature of the mitochondrial stress and the metabolic state of the cell (Mick et al., 2020). Moreover, studies suggest that heme-regulated eIF2α kinase (HRI) is required to activate ATF4 in response to mitochondrial stress in HEK293 cells treated with oligomycin (Guo et al., 2020), and in embryonic and adult hearts of a mouse model of mitochondrial cardiomyopathy (Zhu et al., 2022). Whether the same mechanisms mediate ATF4 induction upon OPA1 deletion in BAT remain to be determined.

Transcriptome analysis also revealed that GDF15 was induced in OPA1-deficient BAT, which correlated with increased GDF15 serum levels. GDF15 is a member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily. It acts through a recently identified receptor, an orphan member of the GFRα family called GFRAL, and signals through the Ret coreceptor (Breit et al., 2021). Several studies have demonstrated that GDF15 mediates its effects on reducing food intake, body weight, and adiposity largely by its actions on regions of the hindbrain, where GFRAL is expressed (Tsai et al., 2018a; Xiong et al., 2017; Tsai et al., 2019; Tran et al., 2018). A recent study also reported that the GDF15-GFRAL pathway is required to maintain energy expenditure during caloric restriction by increasing β-adrenergic signaling to skeletal muscle, thereby inducing fatty acid oxidation and futile calcium cycling (Wang et al., 2023). Nonetheless, several lines of evidence indicate that GDF15 may also have peripheral effects. Indeed, systemic overexpression of GDF15 prevents obesity and insulin resistance by modulating metabolic activity and enhancing the expression of thermogenic and lipolytic genes in BAT and WAT (Chrysovergis et al., 2014; Macia et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2013b). Some of these effects were independent of changes in food intake, suggesting that GDF15 might also exert its effects through yet unidentified receptors other than GFRAL (Aguilar-Recarte et al., 2022). GDF15 can be secreted by various organs such as liver (Patel et al., 2022), kidney (Baek and Eling, 2019), and skeletal muscle (Ost et al., 2020). Recently, studies demonstrated that GDF15 can also be induced in brown adipocytes in response to thermogenic stimuli (Flicker et al., 2019; Campderrós et al., 2019) and prolonged high-fat feeding (Patel et al., 2019). Like FGF21, GDF15 is induced in response to mitochondrial stress downstream of the ISR (Choi et al., 2020). Indeed, our data show that Gdf15 mRNA levels were dramatically reduced in mice lacking both OPA1 and ATF4 in BAT, suggesting that ATF4 may indirectly regulate GDF15 induction in OPA1 BKO mice, perhaps via its downstream target, CHOP, which can bind to the GDF15 promoter (Chung et al., 2017a).

Deletion of GDF15 in the OPA1 BKO background completely normalized GDF15 serum levels, confirming GDF15 secretion from BAT. Under baseline conditions, the metabolic phenotype of OPA1 BKO mice was largely unaffected by GDF15 deletion in BAT. Importantly, FGF21 levels remained elevated in DKO mice and browning of iWAT and increased resting metabolic rates under baseline conditions were preserved. These data reinforce the idea that FGF21 plays a predominant role on the baseline phenotype of OPA1 BKO mice, particularly browning of iWAT; however, FGF21 was dispensable to promote resistance to DIO in these mice (Pereira et al., 2021). Conversely, under obesogenic conditions, our data revealed that GDF15 partially mediates the resistance to DIO. These changes occurred independently of changes in food intake as DKO mice consumed similar amounts of food relative to their WT controls. Rather, our data support the idea that BAT-derived GDF15 increases metabolic rates in OPA1 BKO mice fed obesogenic diets, thereby attenuating weight gain. Furthermore, although under isocaloric conditions browning was preserved in DKO mice, GDF15 was required to maintain browning of iWAT in OPA1 BKO mice fed HFD. These data suggest that GDF15-mediated browning of iWAT during obesogenic conditions might contribute to the increased metabolic rates and reduced weight gain observed in OPA1 BKO mice, as also proposed elsewhere (Teijeiro et al., 2021; Kirschner et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2021). Furthermore, while the calcium pump Serca1 was induced in the gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1 BKO mice fed HFD, this effect was abrogated in DKO mice. This data suggests that GDF15 may also regulate futile calcium cycling in muscle to increase energy expenditure in OPA1 BKO fed an obesogenic diet. Of note, although GDF15 effects on body weight were only partial, the improvements in glucose disposal and hepatic steatosis observed in OPA1 BKO mice were completely abolished in the absence of BAT GDF15, highlighting additional mechanisms of GDF15-mediated metabolic protection that are independent of its body weight-lowering effects. Paradoxically, insulin sensitivity remained improved.

In the context of hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction, which is associated with increased hepatic FGF21 and GDF15 expression and increased liver-derived GDF15 in the circulation, GDF15 was shown to regulate changes in body and fat mass and protect against hepatic steatosis in DIO but had no effect on glucose disposal. Instead, FGF21 was required to increase insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure, and UCP1-mediated thermogenesis in iWAT of regular chow-fed mice (Kang et al., 2021), which is similar to what we previously reported for OPA1 BKO mice (Pereira et al., 2021). FGF21 and GDF15 induction and secretion was also reported in a model of mitochondrial stress in adipose tissue (both BAT and WAT). In this study, under regular chow-fed conditions, neither GDF15 nor FGF21 appeared to regulate whole-body metabolism. Conversely, as in OPA1 BKO mice, long-term induction of GDF15 attenuated progression of obesity by increasing energy expenditure in DIO, while FGF21 was dispensable for this phenotype (Choi et al., 2020). Together, our study suggests that FGF21 and GDF15 play fundamentally distinct roles as part of the mitochondrial stress response in regulating energy metabolism and glucose homeostasis in different metabolic states. Our data support a predominant role for GDF15 rather than FGF21 in promoting resistance to DIO in response to mitochondrial stress and highlights a role for GDF15 in promoting iWAT browning during DIO and potentially inducing futile calcium cycling in skeletal muscle. Some discrepancies between our model and similar models in the literature may stem from differences in the nature of the mitochondrial stress, level of GDF15 induction, and the fact that in our studies FGF21 (Pereira et al., 2021) and GDF15 were deleted in a tissue-specific manner, rather than globally. Also, additional methodological details such as age and duration of feeding might have contributed to differences in our overall conclusions.

Because OPA1 BKO mice have improved thermoregulation, we tested the role of BAT-derived GDF15 for adaptive thermogenesis. The increase in averaged baseline core body temperature observed in OPA1 BKO (Pereira et al., 2021) mice was no longer seen when GDF15 was deleted in BAT. Furthermore, in response to cold, mice lacking both OPA1 and GDF15 (DKO) became severely hypothermic as early as 4 hr into the cold exposure (4°C) protocol. Surprisingly, these mice had increased markers of browning in white adipose tissue (WAT) after 5 hr of cold exposure, despite similar degrees of sympathetic activation. Nonetheless, this increase in browning was not sufficient to maintain thermoregulation in the context of impaired BAT thermogenesis. Our data suggests increased futile calcium cycling in skeletal muscle of OPA1 BKO mice, but the induction in Serca1a levels was lost in DKO mice. Thus, in addition to severely impaired UCP1-mediated thermogenesis in BAT, inhibited compensation in muscle non-shivering thermogenesis pathways in DKO mice may contribute to overall reduced thermogenic capacity in these mice, leading to severe cold-induced hypothermia. Therefore, at least in the context of mitochondrial stress, GDF15 expression in thermogenic adipocytes plays a critical role in maintaining core body temperature in cold-exposed mice, likely by regulating UCP1-mediated and UCP1-independent thermogenesis.

In conclusion, our study has ruled out a role for PERK in inducing the ISR in response to OPA1 deletion in BAT. Furthermore, we also unveiled a role for GDF15 in attenuating DIO and improving glucose clearance and hepatic steatosis in OPA1 BKO mice. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that BAT-derived GDF15 may play a role in energy metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and thermoregulation in the context of mitochondrial stress. Our data also show that GDF15 may exert its effects independently of changes in food intake but predominantly by increasing energy expenditure. The specific molecular mechanisms downstream of GDF15 regulating these metabolic adaptations and the potential peripheral signaling mechanisms that mediate these effects remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, future studies exploring the role of BAT-derived GDF15 on energy metabolism and thermogenesis under physiological conditions might reveal novel GDF15-mediated effects in metabolic homeostasis.

Materials and methods

Mouse models

Experiments were performed in male and/or female mice on a C57Bl/6J background. OPA1fl/fl mice (Zhang et al., 2011), FGF21fl/fl mice (Potthoff et al., 2009), and ATF4fl/fl mice (Ebert et al., 2012) were generated as previously described. GDF15fl/fl mice were generated by Dr. Randy Seeley in the C657Bl/6J background and contain loxP sites flanking exon 2 of the Gdf15 gene. Briefly, to generate GDF15fl/fl mice, the University of Michigan Transgenic Core injected Cas9 protein (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), editing templates containing LoxP sites (IDT Ltd., Coralville, IA) and two sgRNAs (Synthego, Redwood City, CA) recognizing two sites upstream and downstream of exon 2 of the Gdf15 gene (target sequence: uuggauucacacaacccuag and aggaaaagggacauacagag) into the pro-nucleus of fertilized mouse embryos. Embryos were then implanted into pseudo pregnant dams. Resultant pups were screened for the presence of LoxP sites within the Gdf15 genomic sequence. Surrounding sequences were then amplified and subjected to DNA sequencing. Positive animals were bred to C57Bl6/J mice, and the resultant pups were rescreened and resequenced prior to propagation. Subsequent animals were screened for Gdf15 Flox by PCR (5′ forward: agccagagtaggacggatga; 5′ reverse: caattctgcttcaacccccg; 3′ forward: tgagcccttgggaggtagag; 3′ reverse: ggccacaaaccactctacga). Transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the Ucp1 promoter (Tg (Ucp1-cre)1Evdr) (Kong et al., 2014) and PERK fl/fl mice (Eif2ak3tm1.2Drc/J) (Zhang et al., 2002) were acquired from the Jackson Laboratories (#024670 and #023066, respectively). Compound mutants were generated by crossing OPA1fl/fl mice harboring the Ucp1 Cre with FGF21fl/fl, ATF4fl/fl, PERKfl/fl, or GDF15fl/fl mice. GDF15 BKO mice were generated by crossing GDF15fl/fl mice with mice harboring the Ucp1 Cre. WT controls for each compound mutant were mice harboring the respective homozygous floxed alleles but lacking the Ucp1 Cre. Mice were weaned at 3 wk of age and were kept on standard chow (2920X Harlan Teklad, Indianapolis, IN). For DIO studies, 6-week-old male mice were fed an HFD (60% kcal from fat; Research Diets D12492) for 12 wk. After 11 wk of high-fed feeding, a subset of mice was placed in the Promethion System (Sable Systems International, Las Vegas, NV) to measure changes in energy metabolism, food intake, and locomotor activity. For the cold exposure experiments, mice were acclimated to 30°C (thermoneutral temperature for mice) for 7 d prior to being cold-exposed. For the 3-day cold exposure studies when core body temperature was monitored by telemetry, indirect calorimetry was performed using the OxyMax Comprehensive Lab Animal Monitoring System (CLAMS, Columbus Instruments International, Columbus, OH). Unless otherwise noted, animals were housed at 22°C with a 12 hr light, 12 hr dark cycle with free access to water and standard chow or special diets. All mouse experiments presented in this study were conducted in accordance with the animal research guidelines from NIH and were approved by the University of Iowa IACUC. Male mice were used for these studies unless otherwise noted.

Cold exposure experiments

For the 3-day cold exposure experiments, core body temperature was measured by telemetry (Respironics, G2 E-Mitter, Murrysville, PA), as previously described (Pereira et al., 2021). Core body temperature and indirect calorimetry were recorded in mice singly housed in the OxyMax Comprehensive Lab Animal Monitoring System (CLAMS, Columbus Instruments International). For the acute cold exposure experiments, 12-week-old mice were initially individually housed in the rodent environmental cabinets (Power Scientific, Inc, Pipersville, PA) at 30°C for 7 d. The initial temperature (t0) was recorded using a rectal probe (Fisher Scientific, Lenexa, KS) at 7 am on day 8, after which the temperature was switched to 4°C. Once the desired temperature was reached, we recorded rectal temperatures hourly for up to 5 hr of cold exposure.

Glucose and insulin tolerance tests, nuclear magnetic resonance, and serum analysis

GTT, ITT, and measurements of serum insulin and FGF21 levels were performed as previously described by us (Pereira et al., 2021). Serum GDF15 was measured using commercially available kits according to the manufacturer’s directions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Body composition was determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the Bruker Minispec NF-50 instrument (Bruker, Billerica, MA).

Analysis of triglyceride levels

Hepatic triglyceride levels were measured in mice fed HFD for 12 wk using the EnzyChrom Triglyceride Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA), as previously described (Pereira et al., 2021).

RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from tissues with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and purified with the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN Inc, Germantown, MD). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed as previously described (Pereira et al., 2021). Data were normalized to Gapdh or Tbp expression, and results are shown as relative mRNA levels. qPCR primers were designed using Primer‐Blast or previously published sequences (Kim et al., 2013a).

RNA sequencing

Bulk RNA sequencing was performed in BAT of 7-week-old female and male OPA1 BKO mice by the Iowa Institute of Human Genetics: Genomics Division at the University of Iowa. Sequencing libraries were prepped using the Illumina TruSeq mRNA Stranded kit and sequenced on a HiSeq4000. Two approaches were used for read alignment, mapping, and quantification. First, a workflow using HISAT2 (v2.1.0), featureCounts (v1.6.3), and DESeq2 (v1.22.2) was performed (Kim et al., 2019; Liao et al., 2014; Love et al., 2014). The second approach used pseudo-alignment and quantification with Kallisto (v0.45.0) and DESeq2 for differential expression analysis (Bray et al., 2016). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software from QIAGEN was utilized for identification of potentially modified pathways. Data visualization was performed using pheatmap and ggplot2 packages in R. RNA-seq data have been deposited to the GEO database under the accession number GSE218907.

Western blot analysis

Immunoblotting analysis was performed in BAT, iWAT, and gastrocnemius muscle, as previously described (Pereira et al., 2021). Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight and with secondary antibodies for 1 hr at room temperature. Fluorescence was quantified using the LiCor Odyssey imager.

Mitochondrial isolation

Mitochondrial fraction was isolated from BAT, as previously described (Garcia-Cazarin et al., 2011). Briefly, tissue was excised, rinsed in ice-cold PBS, and maintained in ice-cold isolation buffer (500 mM EDTA, 215 mM D-mannitol, 75 mM sucrose, 0.1% free fatty acid bovine serum albumin (BSA), 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 with KOH) until ready for homogenization. Bradford assay was performed to determine the protein concentration.

Oxygen consumption

Mitochondrial oxygen consumption rates were assessed in 50 µg of mitochondrial protein using the Oroboros O2K Oxygraph system (Oroboros Instruments, Innsbruck, Austria) in buffer Z containing (mM) 110 K-MES, 35 KCl, 1 EGTA, 5 K2HPO2, 3 MgCl2.6H2O, and 5 mg/ml BSA (pH 7.4, 295 mosmol/l). The following substrates and nucleotides were utilized: pyruvate (5 mM) + malate (2 mM), followed by addition of ADP (5 mM). To inhibit UCP1, GDP (1 mM) was added after pyruvate/malate. UCP1-dependent respiration was calculated by subtracting the OCRs after GDP addition from the OCR prior to adding GDP.

Transmission electron microscopy

Electron micrographs of BAT were prepared as previously described (Pereira et al., 2017). Briefly, BAT was trimmed into tiny pieces (1 mm in width) using a new blade to minimize mechanical trauma to the tissue. Tissues were fixed overnight (in 2% formaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde), rinsed (0.1% cacodylate pH 7.2), and stained with increasing concentrations of osmium (1.5, 4, and 6%), and dehydrated with increasing concentrations of acetone (50, 75, 95, and 100%). Samples were then embedded, cured, sectioned, and poststained with uranyl and lead. Sections were then imaged on a Jeol 1230 Transmission electron microscope.

Histology

Fragments of BAT and iWAT were embedded in paraffin, portioned into 4-μm-thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA). Light microscopy was performed using an Olympus BX63 (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan).

Data analysis

Unless otherwise noted, all data are reported as mean ± SEM. To determine statistical differences, Student’s t‐test was performed for comparison of two groups, and two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was utilized when more than three groups were compared. A probability value of p≤0.05 was considered significantly different. Statistical calculations were performed using the GraphPad Prism Software (La Jolla, CA). The association between oxygen consumption or energy expenditure and body mass was calculated by ANCOVA using the CalR software (Mina et al., 2018). The significance test for the ‘group effect’ determined whether the two groups of interest were significantly different for the metabolic variable selected.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by AHA Scientist Development Grant 15SDG25710438 and NIH DK125405 to ROP; the Diabetes Research Training Program funded by the NIH (T32DK112751-01) to SHB and to JJ; and the NIH 1R25GM116686 to LMGP. Metabolic phenotyping was performed at the Metabolic Phenotyping Core at the Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center. RNASeq was performed at the Genomics Division of The Iowa Institute of Human Genetics. University of Iowa Central Microscopy Core Facility, for EM analysis. We thank Dr. Hiromi Sesaki, Dr. Matthew J Potthoff, and Dr. Christopher Adams for graciously sharing the OPA1fl/fl, FGF21fl/fl, and the ATF4fl/fl mice, respectively.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1—key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Strain, strain background (mouse, C57Bl/6J) Murine Models Jackson Laboratories JAX Stock #025124 Tag (Ucp1-cre)1Evdr; male and female
Strain, strain background (mouse, C57Bl/6J) Murine Models Jackson Laboratories JAX Stock
#023066
Eif2ak3tm1.2Drc/J; male and female
Antibody Anti-OPA1 (mouse polyclonal) BD Biosciences #612606 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-GAPDH (rabbit monoclonal) Cell Signaling Technology #2118 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-UCP1 (mouse monoclonal) Abcam #Ab10983 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-Tyrosine hydroxylase (rabbit polyclonal) Cell Signaling Technology #2792 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-β-actin (rabbit polyclonal) Sigma #A2066 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-phosphorylated eIF2α serine 51 (rabbit monoclonal) Cell Signaling Technology #3597 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-eIF2α (mouse monoclonal) Santa Cruz Biotechnology #SC81261 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-PERK (rabbit monoclonal) Cell Signaling Technology #C33E10 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-Serca1a (mouse monoclonal) Santa Cruz Biotechnology #SC515162 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody Anti-GLUT1 (rabbit polyclonal) Millipore #07-1401 WB 1:1000, primary
Antibody IRDye 800CW anti-mouse LI-COR #925-32212 WB 1:10,000, secondary
Antibody Alexa Fluor anti-rabbit 680 Invitrogen #A27042 WB 1:10,000, secondary
Commercial assay or kit RNeasy kit QIAGEN Inc #74104
Commercial assay or kit EnzyChrom Triglyceride Assay Kit BioAssay Systems #ETGA-200
Commercial assay or kit Mouse/Rat Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 ELISA Biovendor #RD291108200R
Commercial assay or kit Quantikine GDF15 ELISA R&D Systems #MGD150
Commercial assay or kit Ultra-Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit Chrystal Chem #90080
Commercial assay or kit High-Capacity cDNA reverse Transcription Kit Applied Biosystems #4368814
Software, algorithm GraphPad Prism Software GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA Version 8.0.0 for Windows
Other Chow, standard Harlan Teklad 2920X As described under ‘Mouse models’
Other Chow, 60% HFD Research Diets D12492 As described under ‘Mouse models’

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Renata O Pereira, Email: renata-pereira@uiowa.edu.

Joel K Elmquist, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States.

David E James, University of Sydney, Australia.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institutes of Health T32DK112751 to Jayashree Jena.

  • National Institutes of Health 1R25GM116686 to Luis Miguel García-Peña.

  • National Institutes of Health DK125405 to Renata O Pereira.

  • American Heart Association 15SDG25710438 to Renata O Pereira.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

R.J.S. has received research support from Fractyl, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly. R.J.S. has served on scientific advisory boards for Novo Nordisk, CinRX, Scohia, Fractyl and Structure Therapeutics. R.J.S. is a stakeholder of Calibrate and Rewind.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology.

Resources, Validation, Writing – review and editing.

Resources, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#0032294) of the University of Iowa. Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

RNASeq data (GSE218907).

The following dataset was generated:

Pereira RO, Weatherford ET. 2022. Transcriptome analysis in brown adipose tissue of mice lacking the mitochondrial protein optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) in thermogenic adipocytes. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE218907

References

  1. Aguilar-Recarte D, Barroso E, Palomer X, Wahli W, Vázquez-Carrera M. Knocking on GDF15’s door for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2022;33:741–754. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2022.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baek SJ, Eling T. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15): A survival protein with therapeutic potential in metabolic diseases. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2019;198:46–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bao XR, Ong S-E, Goldberger O, Peng J, Sharma R, Thompson DA, Vafai SB, Cox AG, Marutani E, Ichinose F, Goessling W, Regev A, Carr SA, Clish CB, Mootha VK. Mitochondrial dysfunction remodels one-carbon metabolism in human cells. eLife. 2016;5:e10575. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nature Biotechnology. 2016;34:525–527. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breit SN, Brown DA, Tsai VW-W. The GDF15-GFRAL Pathway in Health and Metabolic Disease: Friend or Foe? Annual Review of Physiology. 2021;83:127–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022020-045449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campderrós L, Moure R, Cairó M, Gavaldà-Navarro A, Quesada-López T, Cereijo R, Giralt M, Villarroya J, Villarroya F. Brown Adipocytes Secrete GDF15 in Response to Thermogenic Activation. Obesity. 2019;27:1606–1616. doi: 10.1002/oby.22584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi MJ, Jung S-B, Lee SE, Kang SG, Lee JH, Ryu MJ, Chung HK, Chang JY, Kim YK, Hong HJ, Kim H, Kim HJ, Lee C-H, Mardinoglu A, Yi H-S, Shong M. An adipocyte-specific defect in oxidative phosphorylation increases systemic energy expenditure and protects against diet-induced obesity in mouse models. Diabetologia. 2020;63:837–852. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chrysovergis K, Wang X, Kosak J, Lee S-H, Kim JS, Foley JF, Travlos G, Singh S, Baek SJ, Eling TE. NAG-1/GDF-15 prevents obesity by increasing thermogenesis, lipolysis and oxidative metabolism. International Journal of Obesity. 2014;38:1555–1564. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung HK, Kim JT, Kim H-W, Kwon M, Kim SY, Shong M, Kim KS, Yi H-S. GDF15 deficiency exacerbates chronic alcohol- and carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury. Scientific Reports. 2017a;7:17238. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17574-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chung HK, Ryu D, Kim KS, Chang JY, Kim YK, Yi H-S, Kang SG, Choi MJ, Lee SE, Jung S-B, Ryu MJ, Kim SJ, Kweon GR, Kim H, Hwang JH, Lee C-H, Lee S-J, Wall CE, Downes M, Evans RM, Auwerx J, Shong M. Growth differentiation factor 15 is a myomitokine governing systemic energy homeostasis. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2017b;216:149–165. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201607110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ebert SM, Dyle MC, Kunkel SD, Bullard SA, Bongers KS, Fox DK, Dierdorff JM, Foster ED, Adams CM. Stress-induced skeletal muscle Gadd45a expression reprograms myonuclei and causes muscle atrophy. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:27290–27301. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.374777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fisher FM, Kleiner S, Douris N, Fox EC, Mepani RJ, Verdeguer F, Wu J, Kharitonenkov A, Flier JS, Maratos-Flier E, Spiegelman BM. FGF21 regulates PGC-1α and browning of white adipose tissues in adaptive thermogenesis. Genes & Development. 2012;26:271–281. doi: 10.1101/gad.177857.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flicker D, Sancak Y, Mick E, Goldberger O, Mootha VK. Exploring the in vivo role of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter in brown fat bioenergetics. Cell Reports. 2019;27:1364–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Forsström S, Jackson CB, Carroll CJ, Kuronen M, Pirinen E, Pradhan S, Marmyleva A, Auranen M, Kleine I-M, Khan NA, Roivainen A, Marjamäki P, Liljenbäck H, Wang L, Battersby BJ, Richter U, Velagapudi V, Nikkanen J, Euro L, Suomalainen A. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 Drives Dynamics of Local and Systemic Stress Responses in Mitochondrial Myopathy with mtDNA Deletions. Cell Metabolism. 2019;30:1040–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Garcia-Cazarin ML, Snider NN, Andrade FH. Mitochondrial isolation from skeletal muscle. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2011;2011:49. doi: 10.3791/2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guo X, Aviles G, Liu Y, Tian R, Unger BA, Lin Y-HT, Wiita AP, Xu K, Correia MA, Kampmann M. Mitochondrial stress is relayed to the cytosol by an OMA1-DELE1-HRI pathway. Nature. 2020;579:427–432. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2078-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kang SG, Choi MJ, Jung S-B, Chung HK, Chang JY, Kim JT, Kang YE, Lee JH, Hong HJ, Jun SM, Ro H-J, Suh JM, Kim H, Auwerx J, Yi H-S, Shong M. Differential roles of GDF15 and FGF21 in systemic metabolic adaptation to the mitochondrial integrated stress response. iScience. 2021;24:102181. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim KH, Jeong YT, Oh H, Kim SH, Cho JM, Kim Y-N, Kim SS, Kim DH, Hur KY, Kim HK, Ko T, Han J, Kim HL, Kim J, Back SH, Komatsu M, Chen H, Chan DC, Konishi M, Itoh N, Choi CS, Lee M-S. Autophagy deficiency leads to protection from obesity and insulin resistance by inducing Fgf21 as a mitokine. Nature Medicine. 2013a;19:83–92. doi: 10.1038/nm.3014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim JM, Kosak JP, Kim JK, Kissling G, Germolec DR, Zeldin DC, Bradbury JA, Baek SJ, Eling TE. NAG-1/GDF15 transgenic mouse has less white adipose tissue and a reduced inflammatory response. Mediators of Inflammation. 2013b;2013:641851. doi: 10.1155/2013/641851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37:907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kirschner KM, Foryst-Ludwig A, Gohlke S, Li C, Flores RE, Kintscher U, Schupp M, Schulz TJ, Scholz H. Wt1 haploinsufficiency induces browning of epididymal fat and alleviates metabolic dysfunction in mice on high-fat diet. Diabetologia. 2022;65:528–540. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05621-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kong X, Banks A, Liu T, Kazak L, Rao RR, Cohen P, Wang X, Yu S, Lo JC, Tseng Y-H, Cypess AM, Xue R, Kleiner S, Kang S, Spiegelman BM, Rosen ED. IRF4 is a key thermogenic transcriptional partner of PGC-1α. Cell. 2014;158:69–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Macia L, Tsai VW-W, Nguyen AD, Johnen H, Kuffner T, Shi Y-C, Lin S, Herzog H, Brown DA, Breit SN, Sainsbury A. Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 (MIC-1/GDF15) decreases food intake, body weight and improves glucose tolerance in mice on normal & obesogenic diets. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e34868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mick E, Titov DV, Skinner OS, Sharma R, Jourdain AA, Mootha VK. Distinct mitochondrial defects trigger the integrated stress response depending on the metabolic state of the cell. eLife. 2020;9:e49178. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mina AI, LeClair RA, LeClair KB, Cohen DE, Lantier L, Banks AS. CalR: a web-based analysis tool for indirect calorimetry experiments. Cell Metabolism. 2018;28:656–666. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ost M, Coleman V, Voigt A, van Schothorst EM, Keipert S, van der Stelt I, Ringel S, Graja A, Ambrosi T, Kipp AP, Jastroch M, Schulz TJ, Keijer J, Klaus S. Muscle mitochondrial stress adaptation operates independently of endogenous FGF21 action. Molecular Metabolism. 2016;5:79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ost M, Igual Gil C, Coleman V, Keipert S, Efstathiou S, Vidic V, Weyers M, Klaus S. Muscle-derived GDF15 drives diurnal anorexia and systemic metabolic remodeling during mitochondrial stress. EMBO Reports. 2020;21:e48804. doi: 10.15252/embr.201948804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pakos-Zebrucka K, Koryga I, Mnich K, Ljujic M, Samali A, Gorman AM. The integrated stress response. EMBO Reports. 2016;17:1374–1395. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Patel S, Alvarez-Guaita A, Melvin A, Rimmington D, Dattilo A, Miedzybrodzka EL, Cimino I, Maurin A-C, Roberts GP, Meek CL, Virtue S, Sparks LM, Parsons SA, Redman LM, Bray GA, Liou AP, Woods RM, Parry SA, Jeppesen PB, Kolnes AJ, Harding HP, Ron D, Vidal-Puig A, Reimann F, Gribble FM, Hulston CJ, Farooqi IS, Fafournoux P, Smith SR, Jensen J, Breen D, Wu Z, Zhang BB, Coll AP, Savage DB, O’Rahilly S. GDF15 provides an endocrine signal of nutritional stress in mice and humans. Cell Metabolism. 2019;29:707–718. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Patel S, Haider A, Alvarez-Guaita A, Bidault G, El-Sayed Moustafa JS, Guiu-Jurado E, Tadross JA, Warner J, Harrison J, Virtue S, Scurria F, Zvetkova I, Blüher M, Small KS, O’Rahilly S, Savage DB. Combined genetic deletion of GDF15 and FGF21 has modest effects on body weight, hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance in high fat fed mice. Molecular Metabolism. 2022;65:101589. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Peng W-Q, Xiao G, Li B-Y, Guo Y-Y, Guo L, Tang Q-Q. l-theanine activates the browning of white adipose tissue through the ampk/α-ketoglutarate/prdm16 axis and ameliorates diet-induced obesity in mice. Diabetes. 2021;70:1458–1472. doi: 10.2337/db20-1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pereira RO, Tadinada SM, Zasadny FM, Oliveira KJ, Pires KMP, Olvera A, Jeffers J, Souvenir R, Mcglauflin R, Seei A, Funari T, Sesaki H, Potthoff MJ, Adams CM, Anderson EJ, Abel ED. OPA1 deficiency promotes secretion of FGF21 from muscle that prevents obesity and insulin resistance. The EMBO Journal. 2017;36:2126–2145. doi: 10.15252/embj.201696179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pereira RO, McFarlane SI. The role of brown adipose tissue in cardiovascular disease protection: current evidence and future directions. International Journal of Clinical Research & Trials. 2019;4:136. doi: 10.15344/2456-8007/2019/136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pereira RO, Marti A, Olvera AC, Tadinada SM, Bjorkman SH, Weatherford ET, Morgan DA, Westphal M, Patel PH, Kirby AK, Hewezi R, Bùi Trân W, García-Peña LM, Souvenir RA, Mittal M, Adams CM, Rahmouni K, Potthoff MJ, Abel ED. OPA1 deletion in brown adipose tissue improves thermoregulation and systemic metabolism via FGF21. eLife. 2021;10:e66519. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Potthoff MJ, Inagaki T, Satapati S, Ding X, He T, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Finck BN, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA, Burgess SC. FGF21 induces PGC-1alpha and regulates carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism during the adaptive starvation response. PNAS. 2009;106:10853–10858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904187106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Quirós PM, Prado MA, Zamboni N, D’Amico D, Williams RW, Finley D, Gygi SP, Auwerx J. Multi-omics analysis identifies ATF4 as a key regulator of the mitochondrial stress response in mammals. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2017;216:2027–2045. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201702058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Teijeiro A, Garrido A, Ferre A, Perna C, Djouder N. Inhibition of the IL-17A axis in adipocytes suppresses diet-induced obesity and metabolic disorders in mice. Nature Metabolism. 2021;3:496–512. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00371-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tran T, Yang J, Gardner J, Xiong Y. GDF15 deficiency promotes high fat diet-induced obesity in mice. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0201584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tsai VWW, Husaini Y, Sainsbury A, Brown DA, Breit SN. The MIC-1/GDF15-GFRAL pathway in energy homeostasis: implications for obesity, cachexia, and other associated diseases. Cell Metabolism. 2018a;28:353–368. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tsai VW, Zhang HP, Manandhar R, Lee-Ng KKM, Lebhar H, Marquis CP, Husaini Y, Sainsbury A, Brown DA, Breit SN. Treatment with the TGF-b superfamily cytokine MIC-1/GDF15 reduces the adiposity and corrects the metabolic dysfunction of mice with diet-induced obesity. International Journal of Obesity. 2018b;42:561–571. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tsai VW-W, Zhang HP, Manandhar R, Schofield P, Christ D, Lee-Ng KKM, Lebhar H, Marquis CP, Husaini Y, Brown DA, Breit SN. GDF15 mediates adiposity resistance through actions on GFRAL neurons in the hindbrain AP/NTS. International Journal of Obesity. 2019;43:2370–2380. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0365-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang D, Townsend LK, DesOrmeaux GJ, Frangos SM, Batchuluun B, Dumont L, Kuhre RE, Ahmadi E, Hu S, Rebalka IA, Gautam J, Jabile MJT, Pileggi CA, Rehal S, Desjardins EM, Tsakiridis EE, Lally JSV, Juracic ES, Tupling AR, Gerstein HC, Paré G, Tsakiridis T, Harper M-E, Hawke TJ, Speakman JR, Blondin DP, Holloway GP, Jørgensen SB, Steinberg GR. GDF15 promotes weight loss by enhancing energy expenditure in muscle. Nature. 2023;619:143–150. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06249-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xiong Y, Walker K, Min X, Hale C, Tran T, Komorowski R, Yang J, Davda J, Nuanmanee N, Kemp D, Wang X, Liu H, Miller S, Lee KJ, Wang Z, Véniant MM. Long-acting MIC-1/GDF15 molecules to treat obesity: Evidence from mice to monkeys. Science Translational Medicine. 2017;9:412. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan8732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang P, McGrath B, Li S, Frank A, Zambito F, Reinert J, Gannon M, Ma K, McNaughton K, Cavener DR. The PERK eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha kinase is required for the development of the skeletal system, postnatal growth, and the function and viability of the pancreas. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2002;22:3864–3874. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.11.3864-3874.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang Z, Wakabayashi N, Wakabayashi J, Tamura Y, Song W-J, Sereda S, Clerc P, Polster BM, Aja SM, Pletnikov MV, Kensler TW, Shirihai OS, Iijima M, Hussain MA, Sesaki H. The dynamin-related GTPase Opa1 is required for glucose-stimulated ATP production in pancreatic beta cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2011;22:2235–2245. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-12-0933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhu S, Nguyen A, Pang J, Zhao J, Chen Z, Liang Z, Gu Y, Huynh H, Bao Y, Lee S, Kluger Y, Ouyang K, Evans SM, Fang X. Mitochondrial Stress Induces an HRI-eIF2α Pathway Protective for Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2022;146:1028–1031. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Joel K Elmquist 1

This article’s findings are timely as the hormone GDF15 is being widely studied as a potential obesity and diabetes target. The results will add to this growing literature.

Decision letter

Editor: Joel K Elmquist1

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your work entitled "GDF15 Is Required for Cold-Induced Thermogenesis and Contributes to Improved Systemic Metabolic Health Following Loss of OPA1 in Brown Adipocytes" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by David James (Senior Editor). The reviewers opted to remain anonymous.

Essential revisions:

1) The reviewers noted a lack of inclusion of single knockout controls. If this data is available, it should be included.

2) More details regarding metabolic phenotyping should be provided.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Jena et al. follows up on a previous study on OPA1 knockout in BAT (BKO) tissue and provides mechanistic details on how certain phenotypes in OPA1 BKO are mediated. This paper tests and rules out PERK as a potential mediator of ATF4 activation in OPA1 BKO by creating a OPA1 and PERK double KO (DKO) in BAT. It also assigns the phenotypes resistance to diet induced obesity, improvements in glucose tolerance and cold induced thermogenesis to be GDF15 dependent.

The manuscript uses OPA1/PERK BAT DKO and OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO, and compares them to wildtype (WT) without single KO comparisons. This needs to be clarified.

1. Is PERK activated in OPA1 BKO? There is no western blot showing increased PERK phosphorylation or any other means of activation.

2. Is increase in serum GDF15 levels due to OPA1 BKO in Figure 1E is it in the physiological range for the receptor GFRAL to be activated? Is giving additional GDF15 to WT or to the OPA1/GDF15 DKO to bring the concentration up to OPA1 BKO levels going to replicate these aspects of the OPA1 KO phenotype?

3. One of their conclusions states that "Our data shows that GDF15 may exert its effects independently of changes in food intake but predominantly by increasing energy expenditure." The energy expenditure data shows no difference between WT in HFD and loss of GDF15 increases energy expenditure in chow feeding. This needs clarification.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

In this manuscript, the authors followup on prior findings in which they showed that mice with a brown fat specific knockout of OPA1 (OPA1 BKO) demonstrate induction of ATF4 and FGF21 secretion and resistance to dietary obesity. Since FGF21 is dispensable for these metabolic benefits, here the authors investigate what mediates the activation of the integrated stress response in OPA1 BKO mice and downstream mediators of the protection from dietary obesity. By making new brown fat-selective double mutant mice, they suggest that PERK is not required for ATF4 induction in this context and that deletion of GDF15 in brown fat partially reverses the protection from dietary obesity seen with OPA deletion.

Strengths of this manuscript include the generation of new brown fat selective double knockout models (OPA1/PERK DKO and OPA1/GDF15 DKO). Moreover, the authors performed phenotyping on both standard chow and high fat diets. Their data indicate that PERK in brown adipocytes is not required for the induction of ATF4 seen in OPA1 deletion. They further show that OPA1 BKO mice with concomitant deletion of GDF15 show attenuated protection from dietary obesity. These mice also have impaired cold tolerance. Weaknesses of the manuscript include the absence of single knockout controls in the experiments presented. In addition, the metabolic phenotyping is not comprehensive and underlying mechanisms for the phenotypes observed are not deeply explored.

1. It is very difficult to interpret the findings of the experiments on the DKO models without single knockout controls. The reader is forced to make a mental comparison to OPA1 BKO mice in a prior paper from this group, but those mice were presumably not studied contemporaneously. Because of this, it is difficult to have confidence that the data support the conclusions made. For example, in Figure 2, the authors make OPA1/PERK DKO mice, and they argue that the increase in GDF15 seen with OPA1 deletion is unchanged (Figure 2D). However, without single KO controls, how can one be sure of this? In addition, the authors argue that OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice show attenuated protection from dietary obesity (Figure 4). Again, single OPA1 KOs controls would be needed to make this conclusion more solid.

2. The metabolic phenotyping is not complete in this manuscript. Specifically, the authors should: (i) show longitudinal weight curves instead of static bar graphs; (ii) provide a more thorough analysis of browning in Figure 2, including UCP1 Westerns, qPCR of other thermogenic genes, and histology/IHC; (iii) the analysis of energy expenditure should show longitudinal data over time in the light and dark cycles, rather than bar graphs.

3. The manuscript does not contain any mechanistic exploration of the findings here. The authors begin to do this in Figure 5, but what do they think explains the fact that OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice show partial protection from DIO, yet are also more cold-sensitive? Additionally, the authors argue that the increased browning in iWAT in DKO mice is due to increased sympathetic activation, but they do not present any data in support of this claim.

4. In Figure 1, panels C and D should be in the same graph.

5. In Figure 1, GDF15 levels are in the ng/ml range, but in Figure 2, they are in the pg/ml range. This should be clarified.

6. The PERK KO in BAT was not nearly as complete as the OPA1 KO. Why do the authors think this is? And could this explain the lack of an effect on ATF4?

7. On page 10 of the text, lines 4-5 (in reference to Figure 4), shouldn't there be a NOT in this sentence?

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

The report by Jena et al. describes the observation that genetic inhibition of both OPA1 and GDF15 using UCP1-cre leads to reductions in circulating GDF15 and reductions in body mass. These effects are associated with increases in EE during the dark but not light cycle, lower fat mass and reduced expression of thermogenic genes in WAT. The findings are interesting but there are many incomplete findings presented which require further clarification.

1. The data around the assessment of energy expenditure is incomplete and inconsistent. For example in Figure 2 the authors present the EE relative to body but no other data from this experiment is provided. In Figure 4F they show EE is elevated in the dark cycle but not the light cycle. They then plot VO2 relative to body mass in an n=4 mice and show no difference between groups. It is unclear where this data came from and if it was the same experiment and if so whether this was collected in the dark or light cycle? In both Figure 2 and Figure 4 VO2, VCO2, and RER should be presented as it is unclear whether a shift to Fatty acid oxidation might be the primary contributor to the increase in the calculated EE. In addition the sample size for all measures is very low making it possible the results may be due to a type 1 error.

2. The authors suggest that the increase in EE may be leading to the reduced body mass of the DKO mice. To validate this hypothesis authors should complete pair feeding experiments as it is currently unclear whether these relatively small changes in EE are critical for the phenotype which is central to the primary conclusions.

3. It is now well recognized that housing mice outside of the thermoneutral zone masks changes in adaptive thermogenesis. Authors should complete experiments at thermoneutrality.

4. Throughout the paper there is paucity of information besides the assessment of a few thermogenic genes about the morphology of the brown and white adipose tissue depots. Authors should provide adipose tissue histology images and ideally electron microscopy images detailing whether there may be defects in mitochondrial function.

5. Related to the above the authors suggest reduced WAT browning is the reason for the hypothermia with cold, however, it seems highly unlikely that given the relatively low thermogenic capacity of this tissue that this is the primary driver of the effect. For example, what about the very large reduction in BAT UCP1 in the DKO mice. Alternatively, did the authors examine whether there might be differences in shivering or skeletal muscle function?

eLife. 2023 Oct 11;12:e86452. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86452.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) The reviewers noted a lack of inclusion of single knockout controls. If this data is available, it should be included.

We appreciate this recommendation. Although we have recently published our data on the OPA1 BKO mice (DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66519), we now include previously unpublished data from an independent cohort of OPA1 BKO in this revised version of our manuscript. Due to time constraints and limited resources, we were unable to conduct de novo studies in additional OPA1 BKO mice, but we have added historical data on these animals that were not previously published. The new Figure 1, Figure 1 figure supplement 1, Figure 6 —figure supplement 1 and Figure 7 —figure supplement 1 show data on body mass, energy homeostasis, indirect calorimetry and browning of WAT in OPA1 BKO mice under normal chow and HFD conditions.

2) More details regarding metabolic phenotyping should be provided.

We have expanded the data on metabolic phenotyping for the different mouse models and added more details about data collection and analysis. Although our main conclusions were unaffected by the additional data, we hope these data will be helpful, and will bring clarity thereby satisfying the reviewers’ concerns.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Jena et al. follows up on a previous study on OPA1 knockout in BAT (BKO) tissue and provides mechanistic details on how certain phenotypes in OPA1 BKO are mediated. This paper tests and rules out PERK as a potential mediator of ATF4 activation in OPA1 BKO by creating a OPA1 and PERK double KO (DKO) in BAT. It also assigns the phenotypes resistance to diet induced obesity, improvements in glucose tolerance and cold induced thermogenesis to be GDF15 dependent.

The manuscript uses OPA1/PERK BAT DKO and OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO, and compares them to wildtype (WT) without single KO comparisons. This needs to be clarified.

1. Is PERK activated in OPA1 BKO? There is no western blot showing increased PERK phosphorylation or any other means of activation.

This is an important point, and we appreciate the opportunity to clarify this issue. Perk was initially selected from our RNASeq data in BAT of OPA1 BAT KO. Of all integrated stress response (ISR) kinases, PERK was the only one significantly enriched in BAT of OPA1 BAT KO mice. This data is now included in the revised manuscript.

2. Is increase in serum GDF15 levels due to OPA1 BKO in Figure 1E is it in the physiological range for the receptor GFRAL to be activated?

Under physiological conditions, such as after prolonged high-fat feeding, GDF15 circulating levels in mice usually double, going from ~ 100pg/mL to ~ 200 pg/mL (DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.016). Thus, our data suggest that the increase observed in OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 2) is within the physiological range. Importantly, administration of recombinant GDF15 within the physiological range does not lead to changes in food intake, whereas at a higher concentration (~5000 pg/mL), food intake is reduced, suggesting GDF15-mediated activation of GFRAL (DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.016). Although not directly tested in this study, we believe that the increase in GDF15 levels observed in OPA1 BKO mice is likely insufficient to activate GFRAL signaling in the hindbrain to reduce food intake, which might explain why we do not see suppression of food intake associated with increased GDF15 levels in our model. Indeed, it has been proposed that the anorectic effect of GDF15 involving GFRAL requires a threshold of circulating GDF15 levels that is ≥400 pg/ml in mice, with lower values not affecting appetite (10.15252/embr.201948804). Furthermore, several lines of evidence indicate that GDF15 may also have peripheral effects. Indeed, GDF15 increases thermogenesis, lipid catabolism, and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation independently of changes in food intake (doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201607110), suggesting that GDF15 might also exert its effects through receptors other than GFRAL and independently of appetite reduction (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2022.08.004). We have expanded our discussion to address this issue.

Is giving additional GDF15 to WT or to the OPA1/GDF15 DKO to bring the concentration up to OPA1 BKO levels going to replicate these aspects of the OPA1 KO phenotype?

These are interesting experiments to pursue. Unfortunately, due to time constraints, we were unable to conduct these studies. It is likely that restoring GDF15 circulating levels to the levels reported in OPA1 KO mice might replicate some of the OPA1 KO phenotype, particularly those shown to be mediated by GDF15. Future studies using mice lacking GFRAL should clarify which aspects of the OPA1 BAT KO phenotype are regulated by GDF15’s central effects, and which ones require GDF15’s action locally in BAT or possibly in other tissues.

Of note, the degree of GDF15 induction in OPA1 KO mice under baseline conditions is similar to that caused by cold stress or high-fat feeding in WT mice, and is not further induced in response to these stressors.

3. One of their conclusions states that "Our data shows that GDF15 may exert its effects independently of changes in food intake but predominantly by increasing energy expenditure." The energy expenditure data shows no difference between WT in HFD and loss of GDF15 increases energy expenditure in chow feeding. This needs clarification.

We appreciate the reviewer bringing this to our attention. ANCOVA analysis revealed increased energy expenditure and oxygen consumption rates as a function to body mass in OPA1 BAT KO mice under isocaloric conditions and when fed obesogenic diet (DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66519 and Figure 1). These data led us to conclude that the increase in metabolic rates resulted in the lean phenotype observed in these mice. Although OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice had increased metabolic rates under isocaloric conditions (Figure 5 and Figure 5 —figure supplement 2), which we believe is mediated by FGF21 (DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66519), upon high-fat feeding, the group effect for energy expenditure as a function of body mass was no longer statistically significant (Figure 6 and Figure 6 —figure supplement 1). This suggested to us that GDF15 might regulate changes in energy expenditure in OPA1 BKO mice fed obesogenic diet. Therefore, OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice lack this increase in resting metabolic rates, resulting in increased weight gain relative to OPA1 BKO mice when fed HFD (Figure 6A). Interestingly, OPA1 BAT KO mice fed HFD have high UCP1 expression in iWAT, while OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO mice lack this adaptation (Figure 6 —figure supplement 1). Furthermore, we observed increased Serca1a levels in the skeletal muscle of OPA1 BKO mice, but not in OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice, suggesting GDF15 might also regulate futile calcium cycling in muscle, as recently demonstrated elsewhere (DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06249-4). Although not directly tested in this study, it is possible that GDF15-dependent induction of thermogenic activity in iWAT and in muscle might contribute to the increased metabolic rates observed in OPA1 BAT KO mice during obesogenic conditions contributing to leanness.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

In this manuscript, the authors followup on prior findings in which they showed that mice with a brown fat specific knockout of OPA1 (OPA1 BKO) demonstrate induction of ATF4 and FGF21 secretion and resistance to dietary obesity. Since FGF21 is dispensable for these metabolic benefits, here the authors investigate what mediates the activation of the integrated stress response in OPA1 BKO mice and downstream mediators of the protection from dietary obesity. By making new brown fat-selective double mutant mice, they suggest that PERK is not required for ATF4 induction in this context and that deletion of GDF15 in brown fat partially reverses the protection from dietary obesity seen with OPA deletion.

Strengths of this manuscript include the generation of new brown fat selective double knockout models (OPA1/PERK DKO and OPA1/GDF15 DKO). Moreover, the authors performed phenotyping on both standard chow and high fat diets. Their data indicate that PERK in brown adipocytes is not required for the induction of ATF4 seen in OPA1 deletion. They further show that OPA1 BKO mice with concomitant deletion of GDF15 show attenuated protection from dietary obesity. These mice also have impaired cold tolerance. Weaknesses of the manuscript include the absence of single knockout controls in the experiments presented. In addition, the metabolic phenotyping is not comprehensive and underlying mechanisms for the phenotypes observed are not deeply explored.

1. It is very difficult to interpret the findings of the experiments on the DKO models without single knockout controls. The reader is forced to make a mental comparison to OPA1 BKO mice in a prior paper from this group, but those mice were presumably not studied contemporaneously. Because of this, it is difficult to have confidence that the data support the conclusions made. For example, in Figure 2, the authors make OPA1/PERK DKO mice, and they argue that the increase in GDF15 seen with OPA1 deletion is unchanged (Figure 2D). However, without single KO controls, how can one be sure of this? In addition, the authors argue that OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice show attenuated protection from dietary obesity (Figure 4). Again, single OPA1 KOs controls would be needed to make this conclusion more solid.

We appreciate this recommendation. Although we understand that ideally the studies in the OPA1 BKO and OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice should have been performed in parallel, our data in OPA1 BKO mice was collected several years ago, and most of it was published in 2021 (DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66519). The cost and time associated with repeating all the experiments in parallel with the OPA1/GDF15 and OPA1/PERK DKO studies would have been prohibitive. Nonetheless, we have now added additional data on OPA1 BKO mice that were not previously published. Although we were unable to conduct new studies, we have added historical data (new Figure 1) on body mass and energy homeostasis on OPA1 BAT KO under normal chow and HFD conditions. We hope that the addition of these new data will aid the reviewers in evaluating the different phenotypes described for each mouse model. We believe these data strengthen our conclusions that GDF15 regulates metabolic rates and the resistance to DIO, as well as thermoregulation in cold-exposed OPA1 BKO mice.

2. The metabolic phenotyping is not complete in this manuscript. Specifically, the authors should: (i) show longitudinal weight curves instead of static bar graphs; (ii) provide a more thorough analysis of browning in Figure 2, including UCP1 Westerns, qPCR of other thermogenic genes, and histology/IHC; (iii) the analysis of energy expenditure should show longitudinal data over time in the light and dark cycles, rather than bar graphs.

We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestions. We have now expanded the data on metabolic phenotyping for the different mouse models and added more details about data collection and analysis. Specifically, we: 1. included longitudinal weight curves; 2. provided stronger evidence for browning in both OPA1/PERK and OPA1/GDF15 DKO models; and 3. added longitudinal data over time in the light and dark cycles for energy expenditure and other metabolic parameters.

3. The manuscript does not contain any mechanistic exploration of the findings here. The authors begin to do this in Figure 5, but what do they think explains the fact that OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice show partial protection from DIO, yet are also more cold-sensitive? Additionally, the authors argue that the increased browning in iWAT in DKO mice is due to increased sympathetic activation, but they do not present any data in support of this claim.

We appreciate the opportunity to clarify mechanisms that are driving our phenotype.

In this resubmission, we include new data that we believe offers mechanistic insight to our work. For example, in DIO, although BAT thermogenesis was impaired, OPA1 BAT KO had increased browning of iWAT. This compensatory effect was lost in the absence of GDF15. Furthermore, we observed increased Serca1a levels in the skeletal muscle of OPA1 BKO mice, but not in OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice, suggesting GDF15 might also regulate futile calcium cycling in muscle, as recently demonstrated elsewhere (DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06249-4). Although not directly tested in this study, it is possible that GDF15-dependent induction of thermogenic activity in iWAT and in muscle might contribute to the increased metabolic rates observed in OPA1 BAT KO mice during obesogenic conditions contributing to leanness.

Therefore, in the absence of GDF15, when browning is blunted, mice gain significantly more weight (Figure 6 and Figure 6 —figure supplement 1). On the other hand, after acute cold exposure, we see preserved browning of iWAT in DKO mice, while core body temperatures were highly reduced (Figure 7). This suggests that the degree of browning was insufficient to generate enough heat for cold-induced thermogenesis, in light of greatly reduced UCP1-dependent thermogenesis in BAT and inhibited compensatory thermogenic activation in muscle (via futile calcium cycling).

4. In Figure 1, panels C and D should be in the same graph.

We have repeated this analysis in OPA1 BKO and OPA1/ATF4 DKO mice side by side. The data confirms our initial conclusion that GDF15 expression in OPA1 BKO mice is at least partially regulated by ATF4 (Figure 2).

5. In Figure 1, GDF15 levels are in the ng/ml range, but in Figure 2, they are in the pg/ml range. This should be clarified.

This was a mistake on our part and has now been corrected.

6. The PERK KO in BAT was not nearly as complete as the OPA1 KO. Why do the authors think this is? And could this explain the lack of an effect on ATF4?

We agree with the reviewers’ observation that PERK levels are not as reduced in DKO mice as OPA1. We believe this reflects PERK expression in non-adipocytes cells in BAT. However, given the greatly reduced PERK expression, we find it highly unlikely that activation of the residual PERK, could account for the increased eIF2a activation and ATF4 induction. Our interpretation is that reduced total PERK corresponds to reduced levels of phosphorylated PERK. In this scenario, if PERK was required for eIF2a phosphorylation and ISR activation in OPA1 BKO mice, OPA1/PERK DKO mice would have had reduced (or normalized) and not increased eIF2a phosphorylation and ATF4 induction.

7. On page 10 of the text, lines 4-5 (in reference to Figure 4), shouldn't there be a NOT in this sentence?

We understand this may sound confusing. We write “Indeed, the group effect from the ANCOVA analysis for oxygen consumption rates in relation to body weight was not significantly different (Figure 4P), suggesting GDF15 may mediate the increase in metabolic rates observed in OPA1 BAT KO mice in DIO”. We believe, that when examined in light of the new data added on OPA1 BKO mice that this interpretation should make more sense. In the DIO studies, OPA1 BKO mice had elevated metabolic rates, which we believe contributed to the lean phenotype in these mice. Conversely, when GDF15 is deleted in the OPA1 BKO background, mice lack this increase in metabolic rates. Therefore, we concluded that GDF15 is required for this adaptation, and, therefore, upon its deletion, mice gain significantly more weight than the OPA1 BKO.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

The report by Jena et al. describes the observation that genetic inhibition of both OPA1 and GDF15 using UCP1-cre leads to reductions in circulating GDF15 and reductions in body mass. These effects are associated with increases in EE during the dark but not light cycle, lower fat mass and reduced expression of thermogenic genes in WAT. The findings are interesting but there are many incomplete findings presented which require further clarification.

1. The data around the assessment of energy expenditure is incomplete and inconsistent. For example in Figure 2 the authors present the EE relative to body but no other data from this experiment is provided. In Figure 4F they show EE is elevated in the dark cycle but not the light cycle. They then plot VO2 relative to body mass in an n=4 mice and show no difference between groups. It is unclear where this data came from and if it was the same experiment and if so whether this was collected in the dark or light cycle? In both Figure 2 and Figure 4 VO2, VCO2, and RER should be presented as it is unclear whether a shift to Fatty acid oxidation might be the primary contributor to the increase in the calculated EE. In addition the sample size for all measures is very low making it possible the results may be due to a type 1 error.

We appreciate the reviewer’s comments. Although we were unable to add more mice to these studies, in this revised manuscript we include additional metabolic data on all mouse models, including VO2, VCO2 and RER. Overall, our data reinforces the conclusion that GDF15 is likely mediating changes to resting metabolic rates in OPA1 BKO mice. Increased RER under obesogenic conditions in OPA1BKO mice, were abrogated in DKO mice, suggesting that GDF15 might also regulate fuel preference. We have included this in our discussion.

2. The authors suggest that the increase in EE may be leading to the reduced body mass of the DKO mice. To validate this hypothesis authors should complete pair feeding experiments as it is currently unclear whether these relatively small changes in EE are critical for the phenotype which is central to the primary conclusions.

Unfortunately, due to time constrains and limited number of animals, we were unable to perform pair-feeding experiments. Nonetheless, our data argues against food intake being the main driver in our phenotype. Despite having elevated GDF15 levels, OPA1 BKO mice have increased food intake under obesogenic conditions (Figure 1), which is not detected in OPA1/GDF15 BKO mice. If food intake was driving the changes in body weight, then DKO mice should weigh less than OPA1 BKO mice, but the opposite is observed. Meanwhile, resting metabolic rates are increased in OPA1 BKO mice fed HFD, but are unchanged in DKO mice. Therefore, our data points to a role for higher energy expenditure as the driver of our phenotype rather than food intake.

3. It is now well recognized that housing mice outside of the thermoneutral zone masks changes in adaptive thermogenesis. Authors should complete experiments at thermoneutrality.

This is an important point. We previously performed experiments in OPA1 BKO mice reared at thermoneutrality (DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66519). Our data showed that even under thermoneutral conditions, metabolic rates were elevated in these mice, and body mass was reduced. Based on this initial data, we decided to conduct our studies in DKO mice under room temperature conditions. Nonetheless, in this revised manuscript we show metabolic data collected in mice housed under thermoneutral conditions for 7 days (Figure 1 and Figure 5). Our data show that resting metabolic rates were increased in both OPA1 BKO and OPA1/GDF15 DKO under these conditions.

4. Throughout the paper there is paucity of information besides the assessment of a few thermogenic genes about the morphology of the brown and white adipose tissue depots. Authors should provide adipose tissue histology images and ideally electron microscopy images detailing whether there may be defects in mitochondrial function.

We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion. We have now included morphological data (histology and TEM for OPA1/GDF15 DKO – Figure 5) and performed mitochondrial respirations in BAT (OPA1/PERK DKO – Figure 3 and OPA1/GDF15 DKO mice – Figure 5).

5. Related to the above the authors suggest reduced WAT browning is the reason for the hypothermia with cold, however, it seems highly unlikely that given the relatively low thermogenic capacity of this tissue that this is the primary driver of the effect. For example, what about the very large reduction in BAT UCP1 in the DKO mice. Alternatively, did the authors examine whether there might be differences in shivering or skeletal muscle function?

We appreciate the opportunity to expand on this point. We indeed observe reduced expression of thermogenic genes in DKO mice in DIO and in response to cold exposure. Although UCP1 protein levels were unchanged under baseline conditions, UCP1-dependent respiration was greatly inhibited. Therefore, it is likely that deletion of GDF15 further impairs BAT thermogenesis rendering DKO mice severely cold intolerant. Although we initially thought that impaired thermogenesis resulted from impaired browning of iWAT, now we show data clearly demonstrating that browning is maintained after cold exposure, and tyrosine hydroxylase levels are unchanged, showing comparable sympathetic activation of iWAT.

Regarding shivering thermogenesis, unfortunately, we were unable to measure this directly, but molecular markers of muscle function (Serca1 and GLUT1) normally affected by cold exposure, were unchanged between cold exposed WT and DKO mice. Interestingly, we now show that Serca1a is induced in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1 BKO mice (Figure 6 —figure supplement 1), which is inhibited when GDF15 is deleted in BAT (Figure 6V). Therefore, we conclude that although it is unlikely that defects in shivering thermogenesis are contributing to our phenotype, it is possible that non-shivering thermogenesis in muscle via futile calcium cycling may be part of the compensatory mechanisms maintaining core body temperature in cold-exposed OPA1 BKO mice. Indeed, a recent study suggest that recombinant GDF15 induces muscle thermogenesis to maintain energy expenditure in mice (DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06249-4).

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Pereira RO, Weatherford ET. 2022. Transcriptome analysis in brown adipose tissue of mice lacking the mitochondrial protein optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) in thermogenic adipocytes. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE218907

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 3—source data 1. PERK is dispensable for the integrated stress response (ISR) activation in OPA1 BKO mice.

    (A) Full immunoblot images for OPA1, PERK, and GAPDH in brown adipose tissue (BAT) (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled). (B) Full immunoblot images for pEif2a and Eif2a in BAT. (F) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in BAT. (I) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (J) Full immunoblot images for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and β-actin in iWAT.

    Figure 3—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for OPA1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for PERK in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for GAPDH in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for peIF2α in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total eIF2α in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 8. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 9. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 10. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 11. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for total tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 3—source data 12. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/PERK double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 5—source data 1. OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice have similar metabolic phenotype as OPA1 BKO mice under baseline conditions (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled).

    (G) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in BAT. (M) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (N) Full immunoblot images for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and β-actin in iWAT.

    Figure 5—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in BAT of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO mice).
    Figure 5—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in BAT of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 5—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 5—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 5—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 5—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 6—source data 1. GDF15 partially mediates the resistance to diet-induced obesity (DIO) and is required to improve glucose homeostasis in OPA1 BKO mice (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled).

    (S) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in brown adipose tissue (BAT). (U) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (V) Full immunoblot for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle and Ponceau red staining.

    Figure 6—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
    Figure 6—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
    Figure 6—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
    Figure 6—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
    Figure 6—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for Serca1 in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
    Figure 6—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for Ponceau red staining for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after 12 wk on a high-fat diet.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Immunoblots for thermogenic markers in iWAT and gastrocnemius muscle.

    (I) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice. (J) Full immunoblot images for Serca1a and Ponceau red staining in gastrocnemius muscle of WT and OPA1 BAT KO mice.

    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original immunoblot image for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original immunoblot image for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 4. Original immunoblot image for Serca1a in gastrocnemius of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 5. Original immunoblot image for Ponceau red staining for Serca1a in gastrocnemius of wild-type (WT) and OPA1 brown adipose tissue (BAT) knockout (KO) mice.
    Figure 7—source data 1. GDF15 is required to regulate core body temperature in cold-exposed OPA1 BKO mice (uncropped blots with the relevant bands labeled).

    (G) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in brown adipose tissue (BAT). (M) Full immunoblot images for UCP1 and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). (N) Full immunoblot for Serca1a and β-actin in gastrocnemius muscle.

    Figure 7—source data 2. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
    Figure 7—source data 3. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
    Figure 7—source data 4. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
    Figure 7—source data 5. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for UCP1 in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
    Figure 7—source data 6. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for Serca1 in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
    Figure 7—source data 7. Original file with the full raw unedited blot for β-actin for Serca1a in gastrocnemius muscle of OPA1/GDF15 double-knockout (DKO) mice after cold exposure.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. I Full immunoblot images for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and β-actin in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.

    (J) Full immunoblot images for GLUT1 and β-actin in skeletal muscle of WT and OPA1/GDF15 BAT DKO mice.

    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original immunoblot image for tyrosine hydroxylase in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original immunoblot image for β-actin for tyrosine hydroxylase in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 4. Original immunoblot image for GLUT1 in gastrocnemius muscle of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 5. Original immunoblot image for β-actin for GLUT1 in gastrocnemius muscle of wild-type (WT) and OPA1/GDF15 brown adipose tissue (BAT) double-knockout (DKO) mice.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    RNASeq data (GSE218907).

    The following dataset was generated:

    Pereira RO, Weatherford ET. 2022. Transcriptome analysis in brown adipose tissue of mice lacking the mitochondrial protein optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) in thermogenic adipocytes. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE218907


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES