TABLE 3. Correlation coefficient analysis between 2 factors.
| Characteristics | Hematoma expansion | Salvage DC | Postop MLS change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sphericity index | ||||
| Correlation coefficient | −0.265 | −0.134 | −0.340 | |
| p-value | 0.048* | 0.323 | 0.010* | |
| Number | 56 | 56 | 56 | |
| Hematoma expansion | ||||
| Correlation coefficient | 0.296 | 0.335 | ||
| p-value | 0.027* | 0.012* | ||
| Number | 56 | 56 | ||
| Salvage DC | ||||
| Correlation coefficient | 0.754 | |||
| p-value | <0.001** | |||
| Number | 56 | |||
We employed the following types of correlation analyses based on the types of variables. (1) Point biserial correlation: sphericity index and hematoma expansion, sphericity index and salvage DC, postop MLS change and hematoma expansion, postop MLS change and salvage DC. (2) Pearson correlation: postop MLS change and sphericity index. (3) Phi coefficient: hematoma expansion and salvage DC. Duplicated or identical variable correlations are highlighted in gray.
DC: decompressive craniectomy, MLS: midline shift.