Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2021 Jan 9;148(10):2571–2578. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33454

Table 2.

Number of women who would have been appropriately treated, appropriately not treated, missed or over-treated for CIN 2+ vs. point-of-care detection method.

True Positives Number of Women with CIN2+ Diagnosed and Appropriately Treated (out of 28 women total with CIN2+) False Negatives Number of Women with CIN2+ Missed (out of 28 women total with CIN2+) False Positives Number of Women Over-treated (out of 1688 women without CIN2+) True Negatives Number of Women Appropriately Not Treated (out of 1688 women without CIN2+) Number of Women who Received Appropriate Care (out of 1716 women)
Screening Test Triage Test
HPV - 23 (82%) 5 (18%) 162 (10%) 1526 (90%) 1549 (90%)
VIA - 21 (75%) 7 (25%) 323 (19%) 1365 (81%) 1386 (81%)
HPV VIA 19 (68%) 9 (32%) 63 (4%) 1625 (96%) 1644 (96%)
HPV HRME 16 (57%) 12 (43%) 43 (3%) 1645 (97%) 1661 (97%)
VIA HRME 14 (50%) 14 (50%) 124 (7%) 1564 (93%) 1578 (92%)