Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 9;11:e16216. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16216

Table 3. Percentages of accuracies (correct classifications), and errors (misclassifications) for each individual used to test the prediction of the Random Forest for Acantholaimus after calculating 500 trees.

Id, identification label of each individual; Species, species described in the original description; Predicted species, species predicted by the model.

Id Accuracy (%) Error (%) Species Predicted species
Id.9 76 23 A.angustus A.angustus
Id.10 90 10 A.angustus A.angustus
Id.18 82 18 A.arthrochaeta A.arthrochaeta
Id.21 88 11 A.barbatus A.barbatus
Id.31 58 41 A.cornutus A.cornutus
Id.47 39 60 A.veitkoehlerae A.robustus
Id.52 81 18 A.sieglerae A.sieglerae
Id.64 96 4 A.veitkoehlerae A.veitkoehlerae
Id.65 98 2 A.veitkoehlerae A.veitkoehlerae
Id.74 70 29 A.quintus A.quintus
Id.81 78 22 A.verscheldi A.verscheldi
Id.89 66 33 A.microdontus A.microdontus
Id.99 30 69 A.septimus A.septimus
Id.108 41 58 A.megamphis A.megamphis

Note:

Bold value indicates the misclassified Acantholaimus species.