Table 4.
Substrate | Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC | Cbz-Phe-Arg-AMC | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kinetic Parameter | Experimental Value | Calculated Value | Candidate Value | Experimental Value | Calculated Value | Candidate Value |
1.15 ± 0.08 | 1.14 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.4 | |||
64.5± 0.2 s−1 | 65 s−1 | 239 ± 6 s−1 | 239 s−1 | |||
1.41 ± 0.01 | 1.2 | 1.34 ± 0.01 | 1.2 | |||
19.9 ± 0.1 s−1 | 20 s−1 | 35 ± 1 s−1 | 35 s−1 | |||
1.67± 0.02 | 1.6 | 2.2 ± 0.02 | 2.3 | |||
15.2 ± 0.1 s−1 | 15 s−1 | 30 ± 1 s−1 | 30 s−1 | |||
1.61 ± 0.02 | 1.5 | 2.07 ± 0.02 | 2.08 | |||
4 | 1.2 | |||||
1.6 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.1 | |||
4 | 4 | 70 ± 50 | 9 | |||
Experimental kinetic parameters are those reported in Tables 2 and 3. Solvent equilibrium isotope effects, , and , intrinsic isotope effects on each step , and microscopic rate constants were obtained by dynamic simulation of the experimental pre-steady-state kinetic data using Kintek Explorer.47 Candidate values obtained from these fittings were then inserted into eqs 14–21 to produce the calculated values in the table. Values for and presented here resulted from extrapolation to an infinite concentration of the variable substrates to produce limiting values and .