Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 12;12:e85680. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85680

Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of included cross-sectional studies (n = 26).

Study Publication type Study design Country Region (If not national) Total Female Population of Study Area Sample size Study screening data source Screening (National/Regional) Screening age range Screening type Screening time comparison Types of Restrictions present over study period COVID-19 7 day new infection rate in region of focus (per 100000)*
International Travel Limits Internal Movement Controls Stay at home requirement Public transport closure Ban on gatherings of >10 people Public events ban Workplace closure School closure Minimum infection rate in study period Maximum infection rate in study period
Europe (n=7)
Campbell et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Scotland (UK) 2728000 Not specified NHS Scotland National 50–70 Digital Mammography Aug – Dec 2019 vs Aug -Dec 2020 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No 10.14 212.67
Jidkova et al., 2022 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Belgium Flanders 3382265 Not specified Flanders Online Screening Database Regional 50–69 Digital Mammography Jul – Nov 2019 vs Jul – Nov 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.58 580.63
Knoll et al., 2022 Preprint Cross sectional Austria Innsbruck 567300 596 Database from gynecological oncological center in Austria, Tyrol Local 45–69 years invited for screening. Women aged 40–44 years and 70–75 years may opt in Digital Mammography Mar – Dec 2019 vs Mar – Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes no data no data
Eijkelboom et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Netherlands 8701000 3371 Netherlands Cancer Registry National 50–75 Digital Mammography Jan – Feb 2020 vs Jul – Aug 2020 Yes No No No Yes No Yes No 0.32 67.25
Losurdo et al., 2022 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Italy Friuli Venezia Giulia 624418 58643 “Data-Breast” database of the “Eusoma certified SSD Breast Unit of Trieste and from the Surgical Department of DAI Chirurgia Generale—ASUGI. Regional 50–69 Digital Mammography Oct – Dec 2019 vs Oct – Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 19.2 497.6
Toss et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Italy Northern Italy, Emilia Romagna 2291000 24994 Emilia Romagna National Healthcare System Regional 45–79 Digital Mammography 2019 vs 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4.00 390.9
NHS England, 2021 Government paper Cross sectional England (UK) 33940000 2230000 NHS England National 50–71 Digital Mammography 2019 vs 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.00 92.36
Oceania (n=2)
BreastScreen Australia, 2020 Government Paper Cross sectional Australia 12780000 Not specified BreastScreen Australia National 50–74 Digital Mammography May – Sep 2018 vs May – Sep 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.18 13.31
BreastScreen Aoteroa, 2022 Government Paper Cross sectional New Zealand 2497000 Not specified BreastScreen Aotearoa National 45–69 Digital Mammography May – Dec 2018 vs May - Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 1.06
Asia (n=1)
Shen et al., 2022 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional China Taiwan 11981657 699911 Taiwan National Infectious Disease Statistics system Regional 40–69 Digital Mammography Jan – Apr 2019 vs Jan – Apr 2020 Yes No No No No No No Yes no data no data
Americas (n=16)
Bessa, 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Brazil 106500000 (2019: 20636636; 2020: 21140958) Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) National 50–69 Digital Mammography 2019 vs 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.00 149.68
Ribeiro et al., 2022 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Brazil 106500000 5996798 Brazilian National Health Service (SUS) Outpatient Information System (SIA/SUS), SUS Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS), High Complexity Procedure Authorizations database (APAC), Cancer Information System (ISCAN). National 50–69 Digital Mammography Jul – Dec 2019 vs Jul – Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 53.72 149.68
Chiarelli et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Canada Ontario 7371000 426967 Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) Regional 50–74 Digital Mammography, MRI (High risk) Jul - Dec 2019 vs Jul - Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.99 117.01
Walker et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Canada Ontario 7371000 605889 (2019) 284242 (2020) Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) Regional 50–74 Digital Mammography Modelled 2019 data vs Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 75.74 117.01
Doubova et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional Mexico 64570000 1431216 Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) National 40 - unspecified Digital Mammography Jan 2019 – Mar 2020 vs Apr – Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 2.60 61.12
Chen et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA 167500000 Not specified HealthCore Integrated Research Database National 50–79 years Digital Mammography Jul 2019 vs Jul 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 119.03 142.00
Amornsiripanitch et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA Massachusetts 3537000 32387 Electronic medical record (Epic, Verona, WI) - Massachusetts. One tertiary care academic center, a community hospital, a specialized cancer center, three outpatient imaging centers, one urban healthcare center, and one mobile mammography van Regional 40 - unspecified years Digital Mammography Jun – Aug 2019 vs Jun – Aug 2020 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No 17.06 53.09
Becker et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA Michigan 5062000 7250080 Women enrolled in Health Managed Organization (HMO) Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) in Michigan Regional 40–74 Digital Mammography Dec 2019 vs Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 147.56 328.94
DeGroff et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA 167500000 630264 Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) Database, which provides cancer screening services to women with low income and inadequate health insurance National 40–74 Digital Mammography Jun 2019 vs Jun 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 45.46 103.84
Dennis et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA 167500000 475083 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey database National 40–74 Digital Mammography 2014–2019 vs 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.00 460.68
Fedewa et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA 167500000 2019:142003 2020:150630 Data from 32 CHCs of the American Cancer Society's Community Health Advocates Implementing Nationwide Grants for Empowerment and Equity (CHANGE) grant program to increase BCSRs and follow-up care National 50–74 Digital Mammography 2019 vs 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.00 460.68
Lehman et al., 2022 Preprint Cross sectional USA 167500000 29276 Screening database over 5 facilities National Unspecified Digital Mammography 2019 vs 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.00 460.68
London et al., 2022 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA 167500000 34000000 (full study including colorectal cancers) TriNetX Research Network National Unspecified Digital Mammography Jul – Dec 2019 vs Jul – Dec 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 74.54 460.68
Miller et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA Virginia 2757460 Not specified Instituition Database, University of Virginia Regional Unspecified (45 - 70) Digital Mammography Jan – Nov 2019 vs Jan - Nov 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes no data no data
Sprague et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA 167500000 461083 62 radiology facilities of Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium National 40–79 Digital Mammography Jan-Jul 2019 vs Jan-Jul 2020 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.00 142.00
Nyante et al., 2021 Peer- reviewed Cross sectional USA North Carolina 5099371 42412 7 academic and community breast imaging facilities in North Carolina Regional 40–79 Digital Mammography Modelled Sep 2019 data vs Sep 2020 Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes 80.27 91.26

England’s and Scotland’s NHS systems are devolved and, therefore, are separate national entities. However, they hold similar screening criterion where breast screening policy in the NHS (across the UK) is that all women aged 50–70 y + 364 d are invited for breast screening once every 3 y.

*

These infection rates were region-specific and analogous to the region the study involved. If study period was ≤1 mo, only infection data from the first and last week of the period will be collected. If study period was over the whole year of 2020, the earliest available public health data was used (e.g., study period started from January 2020 but data was only available in March, March data used as first interval of analysis). It should be noted that there is reporting bias here as testing rates may differ between countries. These infection incidence rates were based on national/regional data depending on whether the study population originated from an entire nation or a limited region within a nation. (Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, 2023a; Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, 2023b; Government of Ontario, 2023; Government of the Netherlands, 2023; Cooper et al., 2023; IARC, 2022; Mathieu, 2022; MDHHS, 2023; Medicaid.gov, 2022; NCDHHS, 2023; NHS England, 2021; OECD, 2021a; PAHO, 2020; Sciensano, the Belgian Institute for Health, 2023; SPICe, 2023; State of Michigan, 2020; State of North Carolina, 2020; The Scottish Government, 2022; UK Government, 2023; WHO, 2023; WHO, 2022; WHO, 2022; Worldometer, 2022; WHO, 2021; Yucatan Times, 2021).

Types of restrictions will include restrictions that were withdrawn at any point of the study period. Restrictions present were classified as per non-pharmacological interventions mentioned by the paper Li et al., 2021 ‘The Temporal Association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-COV-2: A modelling study across 131 countries’, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, if restrictions were introduced/withdrawn during the study period, it will still be indicated as a 'Yes', Data from Oxford COVID-19 policy tracker, devolved state-wide healthcare organization websites in Canada, the USA, and UK was used to assess this.

Data was unavailable for regions in this country, national restrictions were assessed instead.