Table 5.
Outcomes of human-AI teaming.
| Category | Outcome | No of sources | Sources | Cluster(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Human agency | 2 | Fan et al., 2022; Tabrez et al., 2022 | 3 |
| Preference for feedback | 1 | Jain et al., 2022 | 2 | |
| Perception of human | Perceived decision authority | 1 | Xiong et al., 2023 | 1 |
| Subjective workload | 2 | Lai et al., 2022; Xiong et al., 2023 | 1, 3 | |
| Fatigue | 2 | Galin and Meshcheryakov, 2021; Semeraro et al., 2022 | 4 | |
| Stress | 2 | Galin and Meshcheryakov, 2021; Tabrez et al., 2022 | 3, 4 | |
| Fear | 1 | Galin and Meshcheryakov, 2021 | 4 | |
| Role clarity | 1 | Jain et al., 2022 | 2 | |
| AI | / | 0 | ||
| Perception of AI | Trust/confidence in AI | 12 | Demir et al., 2021; Kraus et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022; Jain et al., 2022; Kridalukmana et al., 2022; Rastogi et al., 2022; Tabrez et al., 2022; Vössing et al., 2022; Chong et al., 2023; Endsley, 2023; Naiseh et al., 2023; Xiong et al., 2023 | 1, 2, 3, 5 |
| Comfort with AI teammate | 1 | Hauptman et al., 2023 | 1 | |
| Acceptance of AI/willingness to collaborate As replacement of a human teampartner | 3 | Li et al., 2022; Chong et al., 2023; Xiong et al., 2023 | 1, 2, 5 | |
| AI legitimacy as a team member | 1 | Hauptman et al., 2023 | 1 | |
| Social presence | 1 | Fan et al., 2022 | 3 | |
| Evaluation of AI autonomy | 1 | Hauptman et al., 2023 | 1 | |
| Perceived AI capability/understanding of AI | 3 | Fan et al., 2022; Lai et al., 2022; Xiong et al., 2023 | 1, 3 | |
| User experience, including Engagement, subjective perception | 3 | Fan et al., 2022; Lai et al., 2022; Xiong et al., 2023 | 1, 3 | |
| Satisfaction with AI | 2 | Kraus et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022 | 3, 5 | |
| Team | Human-machine augmentation | 1 | Chandel and Sharma, 2023 | 2 |
| Situation awareness | 1 | Tabrez et al., 2022 | 3 | |
| Decision style matching | 1 | Xiong et al., 2023 | 1 | |
| Perception of team | Interaction experience | 1 | Galin and Meshcheryakov, 2021 | 4 |
| Attitude toward collaboration | 1 | Li et al., 2022 | 2 | |
| Preference for a collaboration mode | 2 | Li et al., 2022; Xiong et al., 2023 | 1, 2 | |
| Responsibility attribution | 1 | Xiong et al., 2023 | 1 | |
| Task | Data management | 1 | Othman and Yang, 2022 | 4 |
| Human reliance on AI/adjusted decision making | 2 | Rastogi et al., 2022; Vössing et al., 2022 | 1, 3 | |
| Perception of task | Perception of task interdependence | 1 | Xiong et al., 2023 | 1 |
| Performance | Performance Human performance (e.g., time/number of pauses) AI performance (e.g., efficacy, precision) HAIT performance (e.g., quality of decision) | 10 | Saßmannshausen et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022; Lai et al., 2022; Rastogi et al., 2022; Tabrez et al., 2022; Vössing et al., 2022; Chong et al., 2023; Endsley, 2023; Naiseh et al., 2023; Xiong et al., 2023 | 1, 3, 5 |
| Cost reduction | 1 | Othman and Yang, 2022 | 4 | |
| Perceived performance | Perception of efficiency increase through AI | 1 | Othman and Yang, 2022 | 4 |
| Perception of AI performance | 1 | Xiong et al., 2023 | 1 | |
| Human confidence in decisions | 2 | Lai et al., 2022; Tabrez et al., 2022 | 3 | |
| Confidence in own performance (human) | 1 | Chong et al., 2023 | 5 | |
| Perception of task performance | 1 | Xiong et al., 2023 | 1 | |
| Context | Perceived risk (of a decision) | 1 | Xiong et al., 2023 | 1 |
| Trust in the team by stakeholders | 1 | Hauptman et al., 2023 | 1 |