Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 16;13(10):e3219. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3219

TABLE 2.

Correlations between age‐matching cross‐sectional subsamples’ ages and brain age estimates.

Matched subject Field strength N subjects Pearson's r [95% CI] * Mean age SD age Mean prediction SD prediction Mean BAG SD BAG MAE RMSE
BBSC1 3T 279 0.56 [0.47, 0.64] 30.64 2.74 28.34 4.10 −2.30 3.42 3.33 4.12
BBSC2 3T 269 0.62 [0.54, 0.69] 28.81 2.83 26.75 3.96 −2.05 3.13 3.02 3.74
BBSC3 3T 248 0.44 [0.34, 0.54] 40.71 2.95 37.86 5.21 −2.85 4.71 4.52 5.50
FTHP1 3T 113 0.71 [0.60, 0.79] 48.60 3.04 44.68 5.93 −3.91 4.34 4.59 5.84
FTHP1 1.5T 49 0.79 [0.65, 0.88] 49.61 3.22 51.98 4.40 2.38 2.71 2.91 3.58

Matched subject refers to the longitudinally sample subjects presented in Table 1. Mean ages for the respective subjects with an interval of five years were used to sample from the cross‐sectional validation set consisting of 3T and 1.5T data from TOP and NCNG samples. BAG, brain age gap; MAE, mean absolute error; RMSE, root mean squared error. BAG is calculated as the difference between predicted age and age.

*

All p < .001.