Table 3. Comparison of the Properties of EAP, SMA, and EACa.
| property | electroactive polymers (EAP) | shape memory alloys (SMA) | electroactive ceramics (EAC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| actuation strain | over 300% | <8% short fatigue life | typically 0.1–0.3% |
| force (MPa) | 0.1–40.0 | 200 | 30–40 |
| reaction speed | μs to min | ms to min | μs to s |
| density (kg·m–3) | 1000–2500 | 5000–6000 | 6000–8000 |
| drive voltage | 10–150 V·μm–1 for electronic EAP, 1–7 V for ionic EAP | 5 V | 50–800 V |
| consumed power | m-W | W | W |
| fracture behavior | resilient, elastic | resilient, elastic | fragile |
Reproduced with permission from ref (50). Copyright 2019 Institute of Physics Publishing.