Table 5.
Regression models for association of grant type and A-CRA provider-level reach outcomes
| Variable | Estimated association with reach outcome (β, SE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any (n = 164) |
First-level (n = 164) |
Full (n = 164) |
Supervisor (n = 149) |
|
| State-focused grant (vs. organization-focused) |
− 0.27 (.11) p = .01* |
− 0.23 (.11) p = .04* |
− 0.15 (.11) p = .18 |
− 0.06 (.15) p = .69 |
| # of providers trained |
0.01 (.01) p = .39 |
0.01 (.01) p = .26 |
0.00 (.01) p = .95 |
0.02 (.01) p = .02* |
| # of supervisors who pursued certification |
− 0.02 (.02) p = .31 |
− 0.02 (.02) p = .25 |
− 0.02 (.02) p = .44 |
− 0.09 (.03) p < .01** |
| Turnover rate |
− 0.2 (.08) p = .01* |
− 0.17 (.08) p = .03* |
− 0.15 (.09) p = .08 |
− 0.02 (.13) p = .85 |
| Grant end date |
0.00 (.00) p = .33 |
0.00 (.00) p = .61 |
0.01 (.00) p = .16 |
− 0.01 (.01) p = .31 |
| Length of grant period |
0.00 (.00) p = .62 |
0.00 (.00) p = .72 |
0.00 (.00) p = .69 |
− 0.01 (.01) p = .29 |
| Constant |
1.05 (.22) p < .01** |
0.82 (.22) p < .01** |
0.12 (.23) p = .62 |
1.10 (.32) p < .01** |
| R2 | .33 | .22 | .05 | .17 |
A-CRA Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach
*Significant at p < .05 level
**Significant at p < .01 level