Table 3.
Effects of MOAs on the growth performance of Ira rabbits.
| Items 2 | Groups 1 | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | MOA1 | MOA2 | ||
| IBW/g | 698.25 ± 4.95 | 696.50 ± 3.45 | 700.21 ± 4.75 | 699.31 ± 2.64 | 0.446 |
| FBW/g | 2272.11 ± 107.51 | 2415.58 ± 137.76 | 2454.57 ± 109.50 | 2372.22 ± 94.01 | 0.061 |
| ADFI/g | 114.74 ± 7.35 | 116.21 ± 8.27 | 119.39 ± 3.45 | 117.07 ± 5.53 | 0.671 |
| ADG/g | 28.48 ± 2.41 | 31.23 ± 2.89 | 32.13 ± 2.34 | 29.73 ± 1.56 | 0.065 |
| F/G | 3.76 ± 0.22 | 3.73 ± 0.22 | 3.73 ± 0.26 | 3.94 ± 0.14 | 0.772 |
| Diarrhea rate/% | 4.19 ± 2.83 | 2.03 ± 1.16 | 2.00 ± 0.79 | 2.81 ± 1.29 | 0.124 |
IBW = initial body weight; FBW = final body weight; ADFI = average daily feed intake; ADG = average daily gain; F/G: feed-to-gain ratio.,1 Control group (CON, basal diet); Antibiotic group (SAL, basal diet + 60 mg/kg salinomycin); MOA1 group (basal diet + 1000 mg/kg MOAs); MOA2 group (basal diet + 2000 mg/kg MOAs). 2 Values are the mean ± SD, n = 6.