Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):3541. doi: 10.3390/foods12193541

Table 1.

Comparison of textural properties of extruded jerky.

Extruded
Samples
Descriptive Indicators Transverse
Shear Force (N)
Longitudinal Shear Force (N) Degree of
Organisation
Degree of Orientation
Beef jerky Variable
amplitude
91.20–113.17 30.30–43.91 2.43–3.32 1.42–1.64
Average value 100.53 ± 6.62 a 37.81 ± 3.69 bc 2.68 ± 0.24 a 1.56 ± 0.07 a
Coefficient of variation (%) 6.59 9.76 8.99 4.66
Pork jerky Variable
amplitude
93.91–119.19 32.70–51.62 2.23–3.08 1.30–1.51
Average value 102.60 ± 7.49 a 41.02 ± 5.40 b 2.53 ± 0.26 ab 1.40 ± 0.07 b
Coefficient of variation (%) 7.30 13.17 10.39 4.82
Chicken jerky Variable
amplitude
61.55–88.44 23.78–41.60 2.06–2.63 1.16–1.32
Average value 78.42 ± 8.10 b 34.22 ± 5.16 c 2.31 ± 0.19 b 1.25 ± 0.05 c
Coefficient of variation (%) 10.34 15.07 8.08 4.20
Duck jerky Variable
amplitude
83.22–110.16 40.42–58.40 1.74–2.37 1.12–1.29
Average value 100.28 ± 7.64 a 50.99 ± 5.26 a 1.98 ± 0.17 c 1.20 ± 0.05 c
Coefficient of variation (%) 7.62 10.32 8.5 4.51