. 2023 Sep 25;13(19):3044. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193044

Table 3.

Inter-rater agreement of different image sets.

Reader 1 vs. Reader 2	T₁WI_O	T₁WI_DL	T₂WI_O	T₂WI_DL	3D FSPGR
Reader 1 vs. Reader 2	κ	κ	κ	κ	κ
overall image quality	0.7	0.8	0.8	0.8	0.8
noise	0.8	0.7	0.7	0.8	0.7
contrast	0.9	0.8	0.8	0.7	0.7
artifact	0.8	0.8	0.9	0.8	0.6
septal cartilage	0.8	0.6	0.9	0.7	0.7
upper lateral cartilage	0.7	0.7	0.9	0.8	0.7
lower lateral cartilage	0.7	0.6	0.6	0.7	0.6

Note. The inter-rater agreement of image quality indices was evaluated by kappa statistics, κ = Kappa values, 0.00–0.20, 0.21–0.40, 0.41–0.60, 0.61–0.80, and 0.81–1.00 indicated poor, fair, moderate, good, and excellent agreement, respectively. T1WI_O = original T1-weighted FSE images, T1WI_DL = deep learning–reconstructed T1-weighted FSE images, T2WI_O = original T1-weighted FSE images, T2WI_DL = deep learning–reconstructed T2-weighted FSE images, 3D FSPGR = three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled images.