Table 1.
Study | N | Inclusion Criteria of Tumor | Treatment | Evaluation | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatanaka et al. [28] | 29 | Solitary and ≤5 cm ≤3 tumors and ≤3 cm |
LR | Gross type (SN type or non-SN type) | Sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 80%; accuracy, 90% |
Li et al. [29] | 31 | Early stage | LR | Microvascular invasion | Non-SN type in the post-vascular phase image was an independent predictor of microvascular invasion (OR, 30.51; 95% CI, 2.335–398.731, p = 0.009). Sensitivity, 93.3%; specificity, 81.3%; positive predictive value, 82.4%; negative predictive value, 92.9% |
Nuta et al. [30] | 73 | Solitary and ≤5 cm | LR | Gross type (SN type or non-SN type) Outcome (recurrence) |
In the post-vascular phase, predictability for high-grade malignant potential was as follows: sensitivity was 93%, specificity was 85%, positive predictive value was 97%, negative predictive value was 73%, and accuracy was 92%. Irregular defect pattern was one of the independent factors for metastatic recurrence (HR, 4.388; 95% CI, 1.008–19.089; p = 0.049). |
CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; LR: liver resection; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; OR: odds ratio; SN: simple nodular.