Table 3.
Comparison of components and antioxidant activity of TPS extracted from tea shoots collected in different areas.
| TPS | Composition Content (%) | Scavenging Ability | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral Sugar | Protein | Uronic Acid | Tea Polyphenols | Total | ·OH (%) | O2-· (nU/mL) | ||
| Varieties | FADB | 34.72 ± 5.69 a | 5.87 ± 0.81 a | 26.06 ± 0.89 b | 6.75 ± 0.96 a | 73.98 ± 5.63 ab | 65.2 ± 3.73 b | 15.41 + 2.86 bc |
| FDDH | 36.08 ± 4.09 a | 4.87 ± 1.22 a | 27.22 ± 2.38 ab | 6.03 ± 0.92 abc | 74.82 ± 4.18 ab | 62.77 ± 0.89 b | 11.37 + 0.66 c | |
| FY6 | 33.00 ± 2.54 a | 4.45 ± 0.40 a | 24.43 ± 2.17 b | 6.59 ± 1.02 c | 67.34 ± 4.31 b | 67.38 ± 4.33 b | 16.06 + 2.13 bc | |
| MZ | 37.42 ± 4.94 a | 5.34 ± 1.13 a | 23.30 ± 4.79 b | 7.32 ± 0.48 ab | 73.13 ± 8.85 ab | 63.66 ± 2.45 b | 18.35 + 3.35 ab | |
| WNZ | 37.52 ± 3.68 a | 4.58 ± 1.61 a | 34.35 ± 6.71 a | 6.64 ± 0.54 bc | 82.29 ± 11.17 a | 66.69 ± 2.93 b | 15.18 + 2.83 bc | |
| Ysh | 36.11 ± 2.21 a | 4.85 ± 0.66 a | 26.29 ± 5.57 ab | 5.46 ± 0.65 abc | 73.64 ± 4.61 ab | 77.95 ± 3.69 a | 22.44 + 5.82 a | |
| Origins | Hubei | 4.18 ± 4.18 a | 4.84 ± 1.58 a | 26.63 ± 2.90 a | 7.07 ± 0.81 a | 73.61 ± 3.94 a | 66.10 ± 4.71 a | 17.37 + 3.83 a |
| Jiangxi | 3.77 ± 3.77 a | 4.88 ± 0.51 a | 26.00 ± 8.06 a | 5.85 ± 0.85 a | 72.25 ± 10.7 a | 66.33 ± 6.44 a | 16.46 + 6.44 a | |
| Yunnan | 3.89 ± 3.89 a | 5.26 ± 0.78 a | 28.2 ± 3.59 a | 6.39 ± 1.33 a | 76.74 ± 6.53 a | 69.40 ± 6.63 a | 15.57 + 3.03 a | |
Different superscript letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) by ANOVA analysis and LSD test.