Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 29;12(19):6292. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196292

Table 2.

Studies investigating the rate of achieving mucosal healing with use of serial endoscopy.

Study, Year, Design Population
(No., UC/CD), Follow-Up
Presence of Baseline Endoscopic Activity (No., %) No. of Endoscopic Assessments, No. (%) pts Undergoing No. of Therapy Adjustments Made Definition of MH, Definition of ER, No. (%) Achievement Associations
Bouguen et al., 2014, retrospective observational study [34] 60 pts, 100% UC,
median follow-up 76 weeks
45 (75%) 2: 26 (43%)
3: 26 (43%)
4: 8 (13%)
Median interval between consecutive endoscopies 25 weeks (IQR, 16–42 weeks)
51 adjustments made within the 45 pts with endoscopic disease activity MH: MES = 0.
MH: 27 (60%) pts with baseline endoscopic disease activity
MH associated with:
Post-endoscopy adjustments in medical therapy made in the case of persistent endoscopic activity (HR 9.8, 95% CI 3.6–34.5; p < 0.0001).
Bouguen et al., 2014, retrospective observational study [35] 67 pts,
100% CD,
median follow-up 62 weeks
67 (100%) 2: 40 (60%)
3: 21 (31%)
4: 6 (9%)
Median interval between consecutive endoscopies 24 weeks (IQR, 17–38 weeks)
72 adjustments made as a result of endoscopic findings of ulceration MH: absence of any ulcers in GIT.
ER: downgrading of deep ulcers to superficial ulcers or the disappearance of superficial ulcers.
MH: 34 (50.7%) pts,
ER: 41 (61.1%) pts
MH associated with:
<26 weeks between endoscopic procedures (HR 2.35; p= 0.035), adjustment to medical therapy when MH was not observed (HR 4.28; p = 0.0003).
Meade et al., 2023, retrospective observational study [36] 50 pts, 100% CD 50 (100%) 2: 50 (100%)
Interval between endoscopies not stated
0 MH: SES-CD ≤ 2
ER: >50% reduction in SES-CD
MH: 25 (50%)
ER: 35 (70%)
Treatment failure associated with:
Failure to achieve MH (HR 11.62, 95% CI 3.33–40.56; p = 0.003), failure to achieve ER (HR 30.30, 95% CI 6.93–132.30; p < 0.0001).
Mao et al., 2017, retrospective observational study [37] 272 pts, 100% CD
Median follow-up 33 months (IQR 27–38 months).
272 (100%) 2: 272 (100%)
3: 154 (56.6%)
4: 69 (25.3%)
5: 26 (9.6%)
6: 10 (3.6%)
7: 4 (1.5%)
Median interval between consecutive endoscopy 24 weeks (IQR: 17–38 weeks).
237 adjustments made as a result of endoscopic findings of ulceration MH: mucosal activity score of 0–2
MH: 126 (46.3%)
endoscopic score system adopted from Af Björkesten et al. [38], mucosal activity scored from in most affected area.
MH associated with:
<26 weeks between endoscopic procedures (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.05–3.39; p = 0.03),
adjustment of medical therapy when MH was not achieved (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.26–2.33; p < 0.01),
CRP normalisation within 12 weeks (HR 3.23; 95% CI 1.82–5.88; p < 0.01).
Wetwittayakhlang
et al., 2022, prospective, observational study [39]
104 pts,
82 (79%) CD,
22 (21%) UC, consecutively recruited
70.6% CD
81.3% UC
2 (relative proportions of study population not stated) Not stated MH: not stated
MH at 6 months:
46.2% of CD pts with baseline endoscopic activity.
25% of UC pts with baseline activity
MH at 12 months:
44.4% of CD pts with baseline endoscopic activity.
33% of UC pts with baseline activity
Not stated

CD, Crohn’s disease; CI, confidence interval; ER, endoscopic response; GIT, gastrointestinal tract; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; MES, Mayo endoscopic sub score; MH, mucosal healing; No., number; Pts, patients; SES-CD, simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis.