Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 25;12(19):6181. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196181

Table 3.

Logistic regression model for predicting a secondary cesarean section.

Independent Variable Regr. Coefficient 95% CI p-Value OR AUC DeLong 1 DeLong 2
obstetric conjugate (MRI) [cm] −0.47 0.29 1.33 0.22 0.63 0.62 Ref. 0.33
adj. obstetric conjugate * [cm] −0.52 0.28 1.28 0.19 0.60 0.66
interspinous distance (MRI) [cm] −0.45 0.32 1.28 0.20 0.64 0.63 0.95 0.21
external conjugate—9 cm [cm] −0.06 0.73 1.22 0.64 0.94 0.53 0.33 Ref.
waist girth (body scan) [cm] 0.08 0.99 1.18 0.08 1.08 0.66 0.92 0.032
waist girth/body height (body scan) 0.24 1.05 1.55 0.015 1.27 0.71 0.35 0.013
adj. external conjugate # (body scan) [cm] 0.23 0.94 1.67 0.12 1.26 0.67
distantia spinarum (pelvimeter) [cm] −0.22 0.57 1.12 0.20 0.80 0.65 0.80 0.15
BMI gain during pregnancy [kg/m2] 0.55 1.07 2.83 0.026 1.74 0.79 0.13 0.007

* Adjusted for neonatal birth weight; # adjusted for maternal hight. Shown are the predictive models for the primary endpoint of an intrapartum cesarean section. Identified independent variables of the three inner and outer pelvic measurements with a p-value of <0.15 in the univariate regression analysis were chosen for the multivariate logistic regression analysis. In total, the best predictive model was achieved using the BMI gain. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as significant. In prediction of the primary endpoint, all models were equivalent to the OC (DeLong 1). 95% CI, 95%-confidence interval; AUC, area under the curve; OR, Odds ratio; Ref., reference; Regr. Coefficient, Regression coefficient ß.