Table 5.
Dietary Pattern | Non-Anemia | Anemia | p | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR (95% CI) | p | PR (95% CI) | p | ||||
Fast food pattern, n (%) | |||||||
Q1 | 338 (91.60) | 31 (8.40) | 0.033 a | 1 | 1 | ||
Q2 | 336 (91.06) | 33 (8.94) | 1.064 (0.666, 1.700) | 0.793 | 1.045 (0.656, 1.663) | 0.851 | |
Q3 | 325 (88.08) | 44 (11.92) | 1.419 (0.917, 2.195) | 0.115 | 1.382 (0.898, 2.129) | 0.141 | |
Q4 | 323 (87.53) | 46 (12.47) | 1.483 (0.963, 2.285) | 0.073 | 1.549 (1.002, 2.396) | 0.048 | |
Vegetarian pattern, n (%) | |||||||
Q1 | 326 (88.35) | 43 (11.65) | 0.493 | 1 | 1 | ||
Q2 | 331 (89.70) | 38 (10.30) | 0.883 (0.585, 1.334) | 0.556 | 0.803 (0.535, 1.207) | 0.293 | |
Q3 | 334 (90.51) | 35 (9.49) | 0.813 (0.533, 1.241) | 0.339 | 0.750 (0.491, 1.145) | 0.183 | |
Q4 | 331 (89.70) | 38 (10.30) | 0.883 (0.585, 1.334) | 0.556 | 0.816 (0.544, 1.226) | 0.329 | |
Meat and egg pattern, n (%) | |||||||
Q1 | 323 (87.53) | 46 (12.47) | 0.128 | 1 | 1 | ||
Q2 | 328 (88.89) | 41 (11.11) | 0.891 (0.600, 1.323) | 0.568 | 0.906 (0.607, 1.353) | 0.631 | |
Q3 | 338 (91.60) | 31 (8.40) | 0.673 (0.437, 1.038) | 0.073 | 0.710 (0.456, 1.106) | 0.130 | |
Q4 | 333 (90.24) | 36 (9.76) | 0.782 (0.518, 1.181) | 0.243 | 0.886 (0.578, 1.358) | 0.580 | |
Rice and wheat pattern, n (%) | |||||||
Q1 | 327 (88.62) | 42 (11.38) | 0.594 | 1 | 1 | ||
Q2 | 333 (90.24) | 36 (9.76) | 0.857 (0.562, 1.306) | 0.473 | 0.927 (0.611, 1.406) | 0.722 | |
Q3 | 329 (89.16) | 40 (10.84) | 0.952 (0.633, 1.432) | 0.814 | 1.104 (0.741, 1.646) | 0.625 | |
Q4 | 333 (90.24) | 36 (9.76) | 0.857 (0.562, 1.306) | 0.473 | 1.201 (0.787, 1.834) | 0.394 |
Note: The chi-square trend test and robust Poisson regression analysis were used for analysis. Q1 was the reference group. Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, boarding status, parental education level, alcohol consumption, BMI Z score, and growth retardation. a Pearson’s R = 0.056, p = 0.033 (a detailed table is in the Supplementary Materials). The bold p-value means “<0.05”.