Public health nutrition occupies a paramount position in the overarching domains of health promotion and disease prevention, setting itself apart from nutritional investigations concentrated at the individual level. While the latter delves deep into the nuances of individual dietary needs, metabolic responses, and genetic predispositions, public health nutrition aims to understand and influence the dietary behaviors of entire populations. Such research spans a gamut of areas: from examining the intricate interplay of food supply and the broader food environment [1,2] and analyzing the implications of government interventions such as soda taxes and healthy food subsidies [3,4], to evaluating how economic conditions and climate change impact food access and choices [5,6]. In an increasingly globalized world, the challenges of accurately measuring dietary intakes at a large scale are also being addressed with innovative methodologies and tools [7,8]. The collective aim of these endeavors is not merely to ensure that individuals eat healthily but to create an environment where the healthier choice becomes easier for everyone.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in capabilities and adoption in recent years. This rapid advancement, driven by innovations in machine learning algorithms and the exponential growth in computational power, has permeated and reshaped a myriad of human activities and social sectors [9]. In the domain of public health and nutrition, AI’s potential is being realized in various innovative ways. AI algorithms have been instrumental in mapping and analyzing food environments, identifying areas with limited access to nutritious foods, often termed “food deserts” [10]. Machine learning models have also been utilized to predict the effects of potential policy interventions, such as how specific taxation or subsidies might impact population dietary habits [11]. At a larger scale, AI has assisted in monitoring global food supply chains, ensuring food safety, and predicting potential disruptions due to climate change [12,13]. With the vast amount of data now available, ranging from satellite imagery of agricultural regions to social media discussions on dietary habits, AI provides tools to synthesize and interpret these data in ways that can inform public health nutrition strategies and interventions [14,15,16].
The potential applications of AI in public health nutrition are vast, and the current body of research may only scratch the surface of what is achievable. The richness of data and the evolving capabilities of AI offer a myriad of possibilities that are waiting to be explored. We encourage our fellow researchers to think beyond the traditional boundaries and explore innovative ways to harness the power of AI in promoting healthier diets and improving nutritional health at the population level. Imagine a world where AI-driven models predict the nutritional needs of entire regions based on climate, soil quality, and socio-economic factors, helping policymakers prioritize food production and distribution. Consider the potential of AI tools that can monitor global food trends, identify emerging patterns, and give public health officials a head start in formulating interventions, or even the possibility of AI systems collaborating across countries to harmonize nutritional guidelines, ensuring that a consistent message reaches all populations.
However, with great power comes great responsibility. There are significant concerns with AI technology that cannot be overlooked. Data privacy is paramount, and we must ensure that any AI-driven initiative in public health respects individual and community rights. Bias is another major concern; algorithms are only as good as the data on which they are trained, and any bias in that data can lead to biased outcomes that could exacerbate existing health disparities. We encourage the community not only to leverage AI’s strengths but also to develop innovative ways to mitigate its potentially harmful effects. This is an era of collaboration between technology and public health, and together, we can ensure that AI serves as a force for good in promoting nutritional health worldwide.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Willett W., Rockström J., Loken B., Springmann M., Lang T., Vermeulen S., Garnett T., Tilman D., DeClerck F., Wood A., et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems. Lancet. 2019;393:447–492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rochefort G., Lapointe A., Mercier A.P., Parent G., Provencher V., Lamarche B. A Rapid Review of Territorialized Food Systems and Their Impacts on Human Health, Food Security, and the Environment. Nutrients. 2021;13:3345. doi: 10.3390/nu13103345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Enes C.C., Rinaldi A.E.M., Nucci L.B., Itria A. The Potential Impact of Different Taxation Scenarios towards Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Overweight and Obesity in Brazil: A Modeling Study. Nutrients. 2022;14:5163. doi: 10.3390/nu14235163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Do W.L., Bullard K.M., Stein A.D., Ali M.K., Narayan K.M.V., Siegel K.R. Consumption of Foods Derived from Subsidized Crops Remains Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk: An Update on the Evidence Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2014. Nutrients. 2020;12:3244. doi: 10.3390/nu12113244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gatto A., Kuiper M., van Meijl H. Economic, Social and Environmental Spillovers Decrease the Benefits of a Global Dietary Shift. Nat. Food. 2023;4:496–507. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00769-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Agostoni C., Baglioni M., La Vecchia A., Molari G., Berti C. Interlinkages between Climate Change and Food Systems: The Impact on Child Malnutrition—Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2023;15:416. doi: 10.3390/nu15020416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Davies T., Louie J.C.Y., Scapin T., Pettigrew S., Wu J.H., Marklund M., Coyle D.H. An Innovative Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Dietary Fiber Content of Packaged Foods. Nutrients. 2021;13:3195. doi: 10.3390/nu13093195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thomas D.M., Kleinberg S., Brown A.W., Crow M., Bastian N.D., Reisweber N., Lasater R., Kendall T., Shafto P., Blaine R., et al. Machine Learning Modeling Practices to Support the Principles of AI and Ethics in Nutrition Research. Nutr. Diabetes. 2022;12:48. doi: 10.1038/s41387-022-00226-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Russell S.J., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence. In: Hirsch M., Dunkelberger T., editors. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3rd ed. Pearson Education, Inc.; Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 2010. pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sigalo N., St Jean B., Frias-Martinez V. Using Social Media to Predict Food Deserts in the United States: Infodemiology Study of Tweets. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8:e34285. doi: 10.2196/34285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.An R., Yang Y., Batcheller Q., Zhou Q. Sentiment Analysis of Tweets on Soda Taxes. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2023;29:633–639. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dora M., Kumar A., Mangla S.K., Pant A., Kamal M.M. Critical Success Factors Influencing Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Food Supply Chains. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022;60:4621–4640. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1959665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mehrabi Z., Delzeit R., Ignaciuk A., Levers C., Braich G., Bajaj K., Amo-Aidoo A., Anderson W., Balgah R.A., Benton T.G., et al. Research Priorities for Global Food Security under Extreme Events. One Earth. 2022;5:756–766. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ramyaa R., Hosseini O., Krishnan G.P., Krishnan S. Phenotyping Women Based on Dietary Macronutrients, Physical Activity, and Body Weight Using Machine Learning Tools. Nutrients. 2019;11:1681. doi: 10.3390/nu11071681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Colmenarejo G. Machine Learning Models to Predict Childhood and Adolescent Obesity: A Review. Nutrients. 2020;12:2466. doi: 10.3390/nu12082466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kirk D., Kok E., Tufano M., Tekinerdogan B., Feskens E.J.M., Camps G. Machine Learning in Nutrition Research. Adv. Nutr. 2022;13:2573–2589. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]