Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Organometallics. 2023 Mar 17;42(7):543–546. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00066

Copper-Mediated Fluoroalkylation of Aryl Bromides and Chlorides Enabled by Directing Groups

Jonathan R Hall 1, Isaac M Blythe 1, Liam S Sharninghausen 1, Melanie S Sanford 1,*
PMCID: PMC10575473  NIHMSID: NIHMS1890305  PMID: 37841393

Abstract

This report describes the reactions between N-heterocyclic carbene copper(I) fluoroalkyl complexes and aryl halides bearing ortho-directing groups. Pyridine, pyrazole, oxazoline, imine, and ester directing groups are shown to dramatically enhance the reactivity of aryl bromides and chlorides with (IPr)CuI–fluoroalkyl complexes (IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene; fluoroalkyl = difluoromethyl and pentafluoroethyl) to afford aryl–fluoroalkyl coupling products. This approach is leveraged to achieve the Cu-catalyzed directed fluoroalkylation of a series of aryl bromide substrates.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1890305-f0001.jpg


Copper-catalyzed cross-coupling is widely used for the construction of aryl–fluoroalkyl (aryl–RF) bonds.1ab,2ab The majority of these transformations involve the reaction of a fluoroalkyl nucleophile (MRF) with an aryl iodide electrophile. In contrast, more abundant and less expensive aryl bromide/chloride electrophiles are rarely effective substrates in these reactions. This limitation is a consequence of the CuI/III mechanism that is outlined in Scheme 1A.3,4 Specifically, oxidative addition of the aryl halide at CuI–RF intermediate I (step ii) is typically prohibitively slow with bromide and chloride substrates.5

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

(A) General catalytic cycle for Cu-catalyzed fluoroalkylation of aryl halides. (B) Previous work: difluoromethylation of aryl halides with 1 (limited to aryl iodides). (C) This work: directing groups enable fluoroalkylation of aryl iodide, bromide, and chloride with various RF groups.

Our group recently reported stoichiometric studies of steps (ii) and (iii) of this cycle using the well-defined Cu organometallic complex (IPr)CuI–CF2H) (1, IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene).6 The reaction of 1 with aryl iodides (ArI) was slow at room temperature but afforded ArCF2H products in high yields upon heating at 90 °C for 20 h (Scheme 1B). In contrast, the analogous aryl bromide and chloride substrates showed no reaction with 1 under analogous conditions.6

We hypothesized that directing groups (DG) could accelerate oxidative addition at 1 and related CuI fluoroalkyl complexes, thus expanding the scope of electrophiles for Cu-catalyzed fluoroalkylation. This hypothesis is predicated on literature reports showing that nitrogen-based directing groups and/or macrocyclic scaffolds facilitate CuI/III- and AuI/III-catalyzed fluorination,7,8 trifluoromethylthiolation,9 and other functionalizations10 of aryl halides. This report describes detailed studies of the reactions of 1 and its pentafluoroethyl analogue with aryl halides containing a variety of different directing groups. We demonstrate large enhancements in both reaction rate and yield for directed fluoroalkylation in these systems, with sp2-nitrogen-based directing groups proving most effective. These stoichiometric organometallic studies are translated to the (IPr)CuI–Cl-catalyzed directed fluoroalkylation of various aryl bromides.

Our initial studies focused on the reaction of (IPr)CuI–CF2H with arylpyridine derivatives to afford the difluoromethylated products 3 or 5. In each case, the difluoromethylation yield after 24 h at 120 °C was evaluated by 19F NMR spectroscopy for the electronically similar ortho- (2) and para-halophenylpyridine (4). This allows us to assess the impact of pyridine proximity/coordination on reactivity. As shown in Scheme 2, significant differences in reactivity were observed under these conditions. The ortho-iodo substrate 2-I reacted to form 3 in quantitative yield, while the para-iodo derivative 4-I afforded 5 in 73% yield. With the bromo and chloro derivatives, the directing group effect was even more dramatic. Trace yield of the difluoromethylated product 5 (≤1%) was formed in reactions of para-isomers 4-Br and 4-Cl. In contrast, 2-Br and 2-Cl reacted to afford 3 in 96% and 16% yield, respectively. The latter result is particularly noteworthy because it is a rare example of aryl chloride fluoroalkylation at Cu.11

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Reactions of 1 with ortho- and para-halopyridines.

To assess the role of the fluoroalkyl ligand on this reactivity we next evaluated analogous transformations with the pentafluoroethyl complex (IPr)CuI–C2F5 (6). This complex was synthesized via the sequential reaction of (IPr)CuI–Cl with NaOtBu and then TMSC2F5 (see Supporting Information for complete details).6,12 Complex 6 was isolated in 40% yield and characterized by NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and X-ray crystallography (ORTEP structure in Figure S45). As summarized in Scheme 3, 6 shows similar reactivity to 1 with the aryl pyridine substrates. Reactions with ortho-halopyridines provide high (2-I, 2-Br) or modest (2-Cl) yields of pentafluoroethylated product 7. In contrast, the para-isomers afford 26% (4-I), trace (≤1%, 4-Br) or no detectable (4-Cl) yield of 8.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Reactions of 6 with ortho- and para-halopyridines.

We monitored yield as a function of time via 19F NMR spectroscopy for the reactions of 6 with 2-I, 2-Br, and 4-I. These experiments were conducted at 90 °C (compared to 120 °C in Scheme 3) to facilitate monitoring of the faster reactions. Notably, no diamagnetic Cu–CF2CF3 intermediates were detected, consistent with oxidative addition as the slow step of this sequence. Substrate 2-I reacted extremely fast, affording >90% yield after 5 min at 90 °C (Figure 1, red). In marked contrast, 4-I showed essentially no reaction over 4 h at 90 °C (Figure 1, green). 2-Br showed intermediate reactivity, affording approximately 30% yield within 1 h and 70% yield after 4 h. These results clearly demonstrate the dramatic rate acceleration imparted by the directing group for both aryl iodide and aryl bromide substrates.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Time study of reaction of 6 with 2-I (red), 2-Br (blue), and 4-I (green). Conditions: 6 (0.01 mmol), aryl pyridine (0.008 mmol) in a 3:1 solvent mixture of dioxane/toluene (0.7 mL) at 90 °C. Reactions monitored by 19F NMR spectroscopy.

We next investigated a series of other directing groups for the reaction of aryl bromide substrates with 1 and 6. As summarized in Scheme 4, both difluoromethylation and pentafluoroethylation proceeded in good to excellent yield with pyridine, oxazoline, pyrazole, and imine-based directing groups. Modest to good yields (25% for difluoromethylation and 73% for pentafluoroethylation) were also obtained with a methyl ester directing group. In contrast, no fluoroalkylated products were detected with the corresponding dimethylamide. In general, reactions of the difluoromethyl complex 1 proceeded in lower yield than those of the pentafluoroethyl analogue 6. This is due to competing decomposition of 1. This CuI–CF2H complex is completely consumed over the course of the reactions and fluorine-containing decomposition products, including CH2F2 and cis-C2H2F2, are detected by 19F NMR spectroscopy (see Figure S1S17). These byproducts are in line with previously reported decomposition pathways for of [Cu(CF2H)] species.6, 13

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Stoichiometric fluoroalkylation of aryl bromides with different directing groups

Finally, we translated the stoichiometric reactions to a (IPr)CuI–Cl-catalyzed directed fluoroalkylation of aryl bromides. As shown in Scheme 5, using 20 mol % of (IPr)CuI–Cl, 2 equiv of TMSRF, and 3 equiv of an MF salt at 120 °C for 24 h led to the catalytic fluoroalkylation of the aryl bromides used in the stoichiometric reactions above.14 Higher yields were generally observed for pentafluoroethylation than difluoromethylation.15 Consistent with this observation, fewer fluorine-containing side products were observed in the pentafluoroathylation reactions. Overall, this represents the first Cu-catalyzed difluoromethylation and second Cu-catalyzed pentafluoroethylation4 of aryl bromide electrophiles.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5.

Cu-catalyzed directed fluoroalkylation of aryl bromides.

In conclusion, this report demonstrates that sp2-nitrogen and -oxygen directing groups enable the CuI-mediated fluoroalkylation of aryl bromides and chlorides, substrates that are typically inert under analogous conditions in the absence of a directing group. The role of these groups is to accelerate oxidative addition at the CuI center. We anticipate that this strategy should prove broadly applicable for achieving challenging Cu-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of aryl halides.

Supplementary Material

Final SI File

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank the National Institutes of Health (R35GM1361332) for supporting this work. LSS was supported by NIH F32GM136022. Dr. Jeff Kampf is acknowledged for obtaining the X-ray crystal structure of 6.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available free of charge at the ACS publications website.

Detailed experimental procedures and analytical data.

X-ray crystallographic data for 6 (CIF); CSD Deposition No.: 2234878

REFERENCES

  • (1).(a) Evano G; Blanchard N Emerging Areas in Copper-Mediated Trifluoromethylations of Aryl Derivatives: Catalytic and Oxidative Cross Couplings. In Copper-Mediated Cross-Coupling Reactions; Wiley, 2014, pp. 517–530. [Google Scholar]; (b) Amal Joseph PJ; Priyadarshini S Copper-Mediated C-X Functionalization of Aryl Halides. Org. Process Res. Dev 2017, 21, 1889–1924. [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Reverse polarity reactions involving the reaction of organometallic nucleophiles with electrophilic fluoroalkylating reagents have also been reported. For reviews, see:; (a) Shibata N; Matsnev A; Cahard D Shelf-Stable Electrophilic Trifluoromethylating Agents: A Brief Historical Perspective. Beilstein J. Org. Chem 2010, 6, doi: 10.3762/bjoc.6.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kawamura S; Sodeoka M Fluoroalkylation Methods for Synthesizing Versatile Building Blocks. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 2019, 92, 1245–1262. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).(a) Casitas A; King AE; Parella T; Costas M; Stahl SS; Ribas X Direct Observation of CuI/CuIII Redox Steps Relevant to Ullmann-Type Coupling Reactions. Chem. Sci 2010, 1, 326–330. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yu H; Jiang Y; Fu Y; Liu L Alternative Mechanistic Explanation for Ligand-Dependent Selectivities in Copper-Catalyzed N- and O-Arylation Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 51, 18078–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sperotto E; van Klink GPM; van Koten G; de Vries JG The Mechanism of the Modified Ullmann Reaction. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 10338–10351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Casitas A; Ribas X The Role of Organometallic Copper(III) Complexes in Homogeneous Catalysis. Chem. Sci 2013, 4, 2301–2318. [Google Scholar]; (e) Giri R; Brusoe A; Troshin K; Wang JY; Font M; Hartwig JF Mechanism of the Ullmann Biaryl Ether Synthesis Catalyzed by Complexes of Anionic Ligands: Evidence for the Reaction of Iodoarenes with Ligated Anionic CuI Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 2, 793–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).For example of isolated CuIII–RF complexes, see:; (a) Paeth M; Tyndall SB; Chen L-Y; Hong J-C; Carson WP; Liu X; Sun X; Liu J; Yang K; Hale EM; Tierney DL; Liu B; Cheng M-J; Goddard WA; Liu W Csp3–Csp3 Bond-Forming Reductive Elimination from Well-Defined Copper(III) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 3153–3159; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lu Z; Liu H; Leng X; Lan Y; Shen Q A Key Intermediate in Copper-Mediated Arene Trifluoromethylation, [nBu4N][Cu(Ar)(CF3)3]: Synthesis, Charactarization, and C(sp2)–CF3 Reductive Elimination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 58, 8510–8514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Liu S; Liu H; Liu S; Lu Z; Lu C; Leng X; Lan Y; Shen Q C(sp3)–CF3 Reductive Elimnation from a Five-Coordinate Neutral Copper(III) Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 9785–9791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wang G; Li M; Leng X; Xue X; Shen Q Neutral Five-Coordinate Arylated Copper(III) Complex: Key Intermediate in Copper-Mediated Arene Trifluoromethylation. Chin. J. Chem 2022, 40, 1924–1930. [Google Scholar]
  • (5).MacMillan has addressed this challenge by engaging aryl bromides in single electron oxidative addition sequences. See:; Zhao X; MacMillan DWC Metallaphotoredox Perfluoroalkylation of Organobromides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 19480–19486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Bour JR; Kariofillis SK; Sanford MS Synthesis, Reactivity, and Catalytic Applications of Isolable (NHC)Cu(CHF2) Complexes. Organometallics 2017, 36, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Mu X; Zhang H; Chen P; Liu G Copper-Catalyzed Fluorination of 2-Pyridyl Aryl Bromides. Chem. Sci 2014, 5, 275–280. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Sharninghausen L; Brooks A; Winton W; Makaravage K; Scott P; Sanford MS NHC-Copper Mediated Ligand-Directed Radiofluorination of Aryl Halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 7362–7367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Xu J; Mu X; Chen P; Ye J; Liu G Copper-Catalyzed Trifluoromethylthiolation of Aryl Halides with Diverse Directing Groups. Org. Lett 2014, 16, 3942–3945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Serra J; Whiteoak CJ; Acuña-Parés F; Font M; Luis JM; Lloret-Fillol J; Ribas X Oxidant-Free Au(I)-Catalyzed Halide Exchange and C(sp2)–O Bond Forming Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 13389–13397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).To date the few reported examples of Cu-mediated fluoroalkylation of aryl chlorides have involved trifluoromethylation.; For the most recent example, see:; (a) Lishchynskyi A; Novikov MA; Martin E, Escudero-Adán EC; Novák P; Grushin VV Trifluoromethylation of Aryl and Heteroaryl Halides with Fluoroform-Derived CuCF3: Scope, Limitations, and Mechanistic Features. J. Org. Chem 2013, 78, 11126–11146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For the most recent review on this topic, see:; (b) Tomashenko OA; Grushin VV Aromatic Trifluoromethylation with Metal Complexes. Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 4475–4521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Previous reactions to form the analogous (IPr)CuI–CF3 complex resulted in concomitant silylation of the backbone. These silylated products may have formed but were not isolated from our reaction. See:; Dubnina GG; Furutachi H, Vicic DA Active Trifluoromethylating Agents from Well-Defined Copper(I)-CF3 Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 8600–8601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).(a) Hartgraves GA; Burton DJ The Preparation and Allylation of Difluoromethylcadmium. J. Fluorine Chem 1988, 39, 425–430. [Google Scholar]; (b) Eujen R; Hoge B; Brauer DJ Synthesis and Properties of Donor-free Bis(difluoromethyl)cadmium, (CF2H)2Cd: NMR Spectroscopic Detection and Structure of Tetrakis(difluoromethyl)cuprate(III) and Related Compounds. J. Organomet. Chem 1996, 519, 7–20. [Google Scholar]; (c) Burton DJ; Hartgraves GA The Preparation of HCF2CdX and HCF2ZnX via Direct Insertion into the Carbon Halogen Bond of CF2HY (Y = Br, I). J. Fluorine Chem 2007, 128, 1198–1215. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Maximum turnover number (TON) is 5; TONs ranged from 0–4.25.
  • (15).The imine substrate is an exception to this trend; in this case, we observe a significantly larger amount of CF3CF2 decomposition products in the crude reaction mixture compared to with the other substrates.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Final SI File

RESOURCES