Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2023 Aug 31;129(8):1284–1297. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02410-y

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 1 — This figure shows the flow diagram of the SURfit study participants from those identified in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry to those included in the analysis. ITT intention-to-treat, Mo months, n number, PA physical activity, PP1 per protocol analysis 1 (assumed allocation to intervention and control group, independent of original randomisation), PP2 per protocol analysis 2 (including compliant participants based on reported compliance with missing data set to 0), PP3 per protocol analysis 3 (including compliant participants based on reported compliance with missing data set to the yearly mean). Footnotes: ^aEligible survivors were identified in the population-based Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. ^bAt some point, recruitment was stopped because of participant saturation. ^cParticipants who received an initial invitation were no longer followed-up by phone because of participant saturation. ^dThis group includes more participants than originally randomised because we re-allocated participants based on assumed compliance independent of the initial randomisation (see “Methods” section for a detailed description of the different per protocol group allocations).