Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD006343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006343.pub2

Comparison 2. Children with fever and neutropenia: caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality (all cause) 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Mortality (related to fungal infection) 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Complete resolution of fungal infection 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Partial resolution of fungal infection 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Resolution of fever in suspected fungal infection 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.34 [0.70, 2.56]
6 Progression of disease requiring change / addition of an antifungal agent 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Breakthrough fungal infection requiring change / addition of an antifungal agent 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.15 [0.01, 3.61]
8 Any clinically significant adverse reactions attributed to the antifungal agent resulting in discontinuation, dose reduction or change in therapy 1 82 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.06, 1.74]
9 Any clinically significant adverse reactions attributed to the antifungal agent (total) 1 82 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.64, 1.72]
10 Nephrotoxicity 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
11 Hypokalaemia 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
12 Hepatotoxicity 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
13 Infusion‐related reactions 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
14 Gastrointestinal toxicity 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
15 Neurological disturbances 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
16 Haematological disturbances 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
17 Length of Stay 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
18 Quality of Life 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
19 Cost 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]