Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD006343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006343.pub2

Comparison 4. Children with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis: itraconazole versus fluconazole.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality (all cause) 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.52 [0.11, 2.56]
2 Mortality (related to fungal infection) 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.07, 15.69]
3 Complete resolution of fungal infection 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.74, 1.32]
4 Partial resolution of fungal infection 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Resolution of fever in suspected fungal infection 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Progression of disease requiring change / addition of an antifungal agent 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Breakthrough fungal infection requiring change / addition of an antifungal agent 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8 Any clinically significant adverse reactions attributed to the antifungal agent resulting in discontinuation, dose reduction or change in therapy 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9 Any clinically significant adverse reactions attributed to the antifungal agent (total) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
10 Nephrotoxicity 1 35 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.13, 3.72]
11 Hypokalaemia 1 35 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.25, 4.54]
12 Hepatotoxicity 1 35 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.07, 15.62]
13 Infusion‐related reactions 1 43 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
14 Gastrointesintal toxicity 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
15 Neurological disturbances 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
16 Haematological disturbances 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
17 Length of stay 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
18 Quality of life 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
19 Cost 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]