Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 18;270(11):5408–5417. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11804-0

Table 1.

Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample

PreHD (n = 33) HD-NC (n = 52) HD-MCI (n = 49) HD-Dem (n = 46) P
Age 40.9 ± 8.7 49.5 ± 9.6 52.3 ± 11.1 53.2 ± 13.4 a0.003; b< 0.001; c< 0.001: d0.585; e0.340; f< 0.974
Gender (female/male) 25/8 33/19 23/26 23/23 aχ = a0.235; b0.009; c0.021: d0.095; e0.179; f< 0.765
Education 14.5 ± 4.4 14.4 ± 3.3 11.2 ± 4.0 9.5 ± 3.8 a0.999; b0.001; c< 0.001; d< 0.001; e< 0.001; f< 0.126
CAG 42.7 ± 2.5 42.8 ± 2.4 43.4 ± 2.3 44.3 ± 3.7 a0.993; b0.702; c0.069: d0.782; e0.059; f< 0.388
DBS1 288.4 ± 98.5 349.1 ± 81.9 394.3 ± 97.9 430.6 ± 113.9 a0.036; b< 0.001; c< 0.001: d0.102; e< 0.001; f0.281
UHDRS-TMS2 1.1 ± 1.6 16.8 ± 11.2 35.5 ± 15.0 47.9 ± 19.7 a< 0.001; b< 0.001; c< 0.001: d< 0.001; e < 0.001; f < 0.001
TFC3 12.9 ± 0.4 12.1 ± 1.0 9.9 ± 1.6 7.1 ± 2.7 a0.162; b< 0.001; c< 0.001: d< 0.001; e< 0.001; f< 0.001
Disease stage
 Premanifest 33
 Stage I 49 21 2
 Stage II 3 28 34
 Stage III 10

1Disease burden score

2Unified Huntington’s disease rating scale-Total motor score

3Total functional capacity

4Mini-mental state examination

5Parkinson’s Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale

aPreHD vs HD-NC

bPreHD vs HD-MCI

cPreHD vs HD-Dem

dHD-NC vs HD-MCI

eHD-NC vs HD-Dem

fHD-MCI vs HD-Dem